File talk:DSLite white trans.png: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::I tried removing the glow of the original, but the quality wasn't good enough and gave it rough edges. If you know where to find the original image, I should be able to render it. {{:User:MARKOL/sig}} 13:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | ::I tried removing the glow of the original, but the quality wasn't good enough and gave it rough edges. If you know where to find the original image, I should be able to render it. {{:User:MARKOL/sig}} 13:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Do we really need it? We have no use for such a large image. Like I said. We have got to keep loading times down. We don't need huge images of such a mundane subject.{{:User:Mjr162006/sig}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">13:03, October 20, 2008 (UTC)</span> | |||
Revision as of 13:03, 20 October 2008
Overwrite
Wait, why the new version of this image? I picked the old one because it was of such an insanely high resolution and looked pretty. While the new version's nice, it's about 1/5 of the size! Granted, the transparenting on the new image is better (no bizarre "glow"), so maybe that's why? User:Ando/sig 12:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Loading time for one thing. 2 MB + size images all over the site can really slow done the wiki. Plus it really didn't need to be that big anyway. Not for how it is used.User:Mjr162006/sig 12:57, October 20, 2008 (UTC)
- I tried removing the glow of the original, but the quality wasn't good enough and gave it rough edges. If you know where to find the original image, I should be able to render it. User:MARKOL/sig 13:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Do we really need it? We have no use for such a large image. Like I said. We have got to keep loading times down. We don't need huge images of such a mundane subject.User:Mjr162006/sig 13:03, October 20, 2008 (UTC)
