File talk:DSLite white trans.png: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Wait, why the new version of this image? I picked the old one because it was of such an insanely high resolution and looked pretty. While the new version's nice, it's about 1/5 of the size! Granted, the transparenting on the new image is better ''(no bizarre "glow")'', so maybe that's why? {{:User:Ando/sig}} 12:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | Wait, why the new version of this image? I picked the old one because it was of such an insanely high resolution and looked pretty. While the new version's nice, it's about 1/5 of the size! Granted, the transparenting on the new image is better ''(no bizarre "glow")'', so maybe that's why? {{:User:Ando/sig}} 12:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Loading time for one thing. 2 MB + size images all over the site can really slow done the wiki. Plus it really didn't need to be that big anyway. Not for how it is used.{{:User: | :Loading time for one thing. 2 MB + size images all over the site can really slow done the wiki. Plus it really didn't need to be that big anyway. Not for how it is used.{{:User:Matt/sig}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">12:57, October 20, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
::I tried removing the glow of the original, but the quality wasn't good enough and gave it rough edges. If you know where to find the original image, I should be able to render it. {{:User:MARKOL/sig}} 13:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | ::I tried removing the glow of the original, but the quality wasn't good enough and gave it rough edges. If you know where to find the original image, I should be able to render it. {{:User:MARKOL/sig}} 13:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Do we really need it? We have no use for such a large image. Like I said. We have got to keep loading times down. We don't need huge images of such a mundane subject.{{:User: | :::Do we really need it? We have no use for such a large image. Like I said. We have got to keep loading times down. We don't need huge images of such a mundane subject.{{:User:Matt/sig}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">13:03, October 20, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
::::Not the size, I just thought it had better presence than the current one. {{:User:MARKOL/sig}} 13:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | ::::Not the size, I just thought it had better presence than the current one. {{:User:MARKOL/sig}} 13:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
The only real difference in that area is that the other one has the startup logo instead. If only the angles were compatible.{{:User: | The only real difference in that area is that the other one has the startup logo instead. If only the angles were compatible.{{:User:Matt/sig}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">13:14, October 20, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
:Actually, regarding size of image, I did a test just now. The image page states that the size of the image is 124 KB. On the DS Lite page ''(where the image is resized using the |---px option)'', I pulled up the image's properties as it was displayed on that page and it showed up as 44 KB. So the Wiki software gives you only what you need -- it doesn't load the whole 2 MB when you only need 200 KB. | :Actually, regarding size of image, I did a test just now. The image page states that the size of the image is 124 KB. On the DS Lite page ''(where the image is resized using the |---px option)'', I pulled up the image's properties as it was displayed on that page and it showed up as 44 KB. So the Wiki software gives you only what you need -- it doesn't load the whole 2 MB when you only need 200 KB. | ||
:Still, though, no, I don't know where to find the original of that image. Dang, if my sister's DS Lite wasn't all scratched up I'd take a picture of it for the site. :/ {{:User:Ando/sig}} 13:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | :Still, though, no, I don't know where to find the original of that image. Dang, if my sister's DS Lite wasn't all scratched up I'd take a picture of it for the site. :/ {{:User:Ando/sig}} 13:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
::It still takes longer to load a larger image. The software has to resize it. That isn't cheap on memory.{{:User: | ::It still takes longer to load a larger image. The software has to resize it. That isn't cheap on memory.{{:User:Matt/sig}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">13:34, October 20, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
Revision as of 09:24, 16 November 2008
Overwrite
Wait, why the new version of this image? I picked the old one because it was of such an insanely high resolution and looked pretty. While the new version's nice, it's about 1/5 of the size! Granted, the transparenting on the new image is better (no bizarre "glow"), so maybe that's why? User:Ando/sig 12:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Loading time for one thing. 2 MB + size images all over the site can really slow done the wiki. Plus it really didn't need to be that big anyway. Not for how it is used.User:Matt/sig 12:57, October 20, 2008 (UTC)
- I tried removing the glow of the original, but the quality wasn't good enough and gave it rough edges. If you know where to find the original image, I should be able to render it. User:MARKOL/sig 13:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Do we really need it? We have no use for such a large image. Like I said. We have got to keep loading times down. We don't need huge images of such a mundane subject.User:Matt/sig 13:03, October 20, 2008 (UTC)
- Not the size, I just thought it had better presence than the current one. User:MARKOL/sig 13:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
The only real difference in that area is that the other one has the startup logo instead. If only the angles were compatible.User:Matt/sig 13:14, October 20, 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, regarding size of image, I did a test just now. The image page states that the size of the image is 124 KB. On the DS Lite page (where the image is resized using the |---px option), I pulled up the image's properties as it was displayed on that page and it showed up as 44 KB. So the Wiki software gives you only what you need -- it doesn't load the whole 2 MB when you only need 200 KB.
- Still, though, no, I don't know where to find the original of that image. Dang, if my sister's DS Lite wasn't all scratched up I'd take a picture of it for the site. :/ User:Ando/sig 13:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- It still takes longer to load a larger image. The software has to resize it. That isn't cheap on memory.User:Matt/sig 13:34, October 20, 2008 (UTC)
