Zelda Wiki:Featured Picture Nomination: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Zelda Wiki:Featured Picture Nomination (view source)
Revision as of 10:40, 20 December 2012
, 20 December 2012no edit summary
m (→The Wind Waker Japanese boxart: Please update the content's scored accordingly.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
#There is a lot of detail in the image, and the colors look nice.--[[User:Player1won|Player1won]] 22:14, 18 May 2012 (EDT) | #There is a lot of detail in the image, and the colors look nice.--[[User:Player1won|Player1won]] 22:14, 18 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
#Once again we get the short end of the stick. The box art here is stunning and is, (in my opinion) better than the North Amarican box art. --[[User:Shyla12323|Shyla12323]] 15:30 17 December 2012 (EST) | #Once again we get the short end of the stick. The box art here is stunning and is, (in my opinion) better than the North Amarican box art. --[[User:Shyla12323|Shyla12323]] 15:30 17 December 2012 (EST) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#It's kind of interesting looking, I suppose, but I can't say I'm really happy with the idea of prominently showing high-resolution product images like this (since it's something other wikis specifically tend to steer away from for legal reasons). Aside from that vague concern, we already have quite a few WW images featured, two of which have Link and KoRL as their subject matter, so I don't really feel it helps the overall diversity. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 03:05, 29 February 2012 (EST) | #It's kind of interesting looking, I suppose, but I can't say I'm really happy with the idea of prominently showing high-resolution product images like this (since it's something other wikis specifically tend to steer away from for legal reasons). Aside from that vague concern, we already have quite a few WW images featured, two of which have Link and KoRL as their subject matter, so I don't really feel it helps the overall diversity. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 03:05, 29 February 2012 (EST) | ||
#Adam's hit the head on the nail yet again. It does look cool, but we've got much better stuff than this.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 19:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC) | #Adam's hit the head on the nail yet again. It does look cool, but we've got much better stuff than this.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 19:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
#The picture itself is okay, but the brand name and text detracts from the picture. It would look less cluttered if the text wasn't there,but the image itself is also messy. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 19:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | #The picture itself is okay, but the brand name and text detracts from the picture. It would look less cluttered if the text wasn't there,but the image itself is also messy. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 19:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| Line 45: | Line 26: | ||
==[[Link]] resting== | ==[[Link]] resting== | ||
<div style="font-size:120%; font-weight:bold;"> | <div style="font-size:120%; font-weight:bold;"> | ||
*Score: | *Score: 2 | ||
*Final Date: April 13, 2013 | *Final Date: April 13, 2013 | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
[[File:Link resting.jpg|thumb|right|Official artwork from the remake of ''A Link to the Past'']] | [[File:Link resting.jpg|thumb|right|181px|Official artwork from the remake of ''A Link to the Past'']] | ||
A high quality image of Link taking a break under a tree. It has great, vibrant colors and, even though it could do without the logo at the top, that doesn't take away from this not ''too'' well-known artwork from the ''A Link to the Past'' remake. --[[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 17:53, 12 July 2012 (EDT) | A high quality image of Link taking a break under a tree. It has great, vibrant colors and, even though it could do without the logo at the top, that doesn't take away from this not ''too'' well-known artwork from the ''A Link to the Past'' remake. --[[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 17:53, 12 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#The image is crisp and clear with vivid colors. This picture is pleasant to look at. {{:User:Player1won/sig}} 18:05, 8 August 2012 (EDT) | #The image is crisp and clear with vivid colors. This picture is pleasant to look at. {{:User:Player1won/sig}} 18:05, 8 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
#I like this one; it's a great quality image, and the style's quite different from anything else we've featured so far. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 10:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| Line 67: | Line 51: | ||
#Amazing quality. Beautiful colors. Great artwork. This artwork has every reason to feature it, and no reasons not to. My vote goes with this image, definitely. And did I mention it's a large image which preserves quality as it's magnified? You can really see the detail. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 21:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC) | #Amazing quality. Beautiful colors. Great artwork. This artwork has every reason to feature it, and no reasons not to. My vote goes with this image, definitely. And did I mention it's a large image which preserves quality as it's magnified? You can really see the detail. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 21:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
