Zelda Wiki:Featured Picture Nomination: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Zelda Wiki:Featured Picture Nomination (view source)
Revision as of 14:24, 29 April 2013
, 29 April 2013no edit summary
m (And it would be even better for me to follow the format!) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
#While the picture is definitely impressive and detailed, the problem is that we don't have any information yet about the graphical style of the game, so I think it is a bit premature to include it at this point. [[User:Zeldafan1982|Zeldafan1982]] 22:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC) | #While the picture is definitely impressive and detailed, the problem is that we don't have any information yet about the graphical style of the game, so I think it is a bit premature to include it at this point. [[User:Zeldafan1982|Zeldafan1982]] 22:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#I agree with Zeldafan. It's a cool picture, but it doesn't really strike me as "interesting," considering that we know nothing about the game. Hey, as far we know, this might not even be ''in'' the game. Tech demos have a fun way of just throwing together something for the sake of showcasing new stuff. It would be more prudent to wait for actual information about the game.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 12:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | #I agree with Zeldafan. It's a cool picture, but it doesn't really strike me as "interesting," considering that we know nothing about the game. Hey, as far we know, this might not even be ''in'' the game. Tech demos have a fun way of just throwing together something for the sake of showcasing new stuff. It would be more prudent to wait for actual information about the game.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 12:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah I agree that it's a bad idea to include beta and preview images; plenty of examples [[Beta_Content|here]] of the kind of stuff that doesn't make it into final releases, so not the ideal thing to be featuring. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 14:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
#Well, I personally don't think that this is "symbolic". The new HD Zelda we know nothing about, so it might be much less realistic. It does, however, show the Wii U's potential, and the image itself is high-quality. Every tiny detail, from the patterns on the torches to the markings on Armogohma's legs, adds contrast to this image. There is an amazing use of shadow and dimension in this image, with every aspect of it standing clearly on a different layer. It's also extremely high resolution. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 12:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | #Well, I personally don't think that this is "symbolic". The new HD Zelda we know nothing about, so it might be much less realistic. It does, however, show the Wii U's potential, and the image itself is high-quality. Every tiny detail, from the patterns on the torches to the markings on Armogohma's legs, adds contrast to this image. There is an amazing use of shadow and dimension in this image, with every aspect of it standing clearly on a different layer. It's also extremely high resolution. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 12:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
