Talk:Proxi

Should Legends be included?
Starting the discussion page, rather than arguing in edit comments. Link Lab and I seem to disagree over the inclusion of under 'Game(s)'. The 'conversation' has gone as follows:
 * Link Lab: "Listing HWL isn't necessary as her appearance in HWL is no different to HW"
 * [removes HWL and cleans up language regions]
 * D0xis: "HW and HWL are in fact two different games"
 * [re-adds HWL and adds to language regions]
 * "Yes but unless there is a substantial new appearance, which there isn't, her appearance in HWL does not need to be noted in the infobox. Do not undo this again."
 * [reverts change]

To clarify: I am creating this as a way to properly discus this matter. Such discussions should not be had in the editing comments. I still believe there is enough notable difference between the games (and more specifically Proxi's roll) to include it. I will be re-adding the meaning to the English name, but until we reach a consensus, I will refrain from adding HWL. ~D0xis of the V0id~(T 15:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Hmmm I can see why people would think it'd be redundant to add Hyrule Warriors Legends. It'd kind of be like adding Navi's appearances as and . Not sure about Proxi though since I haven't played HWL so I'm not sure how different the games are. I know HWL added new stories and such, so if it's different/new enough from HW, then I don't see how it could do any harm to also add it under her appearances infobox. --Dany36 (talk) 15:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)