User talk:Jimbo Jambo3094@legacy41959467

Hello

 * Ah, a public user creation log. I was wondering how you were able to welcome me before I even made an edit. Anyway, thanks. Jimbo Jambo 05:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome ;)-- 05:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit

 * About this. I believe he was meaning to put that on the article page itself. Not the article discussion page. The edit itself -grammar wise- is also pretty poor.


 * He signed the post, which makes me believe he knew he was using the discussion page. What confuses me though is that he immediately undid his own revision, and then you re-added it. Jimbo Jambo 21:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Heh heh, I wasn't aware that he actually undid the edit but, talk about a coincidence, another user just told me this. Sorry about this :/


 * Eh, nothing to be sorry about, I was just trying to figure out what happened. In any case, it's been brought to attention now, so someone with Soulcalibur could add the information to the sword's article. Jimbo Jambo 21:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thumb Up
Just wanted to say that you're doing an awesome job with all your edits and contributions, so thanks. Keep it up. :D {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 21:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Sorry if I seemed rude when you complemented me earlier - I'm not very good at accepting praise, since I usually think it's sarcastic. That's probably because I'm just used to people hating my guts for disagreeing them them all the time. Jimbo Jambo 23:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * No worries. You're doing a great job all around... you put in a lot more effort than most new people. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 23:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Autopatrol
Congratulations on being promoted to autopatrol.{{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 22:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

o_o What patrol? Jimbo Jambo 00:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * You were promoted to autopatrol. Basically what it is, is you're a rank above a new user. Keep up the good edits ;){{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 01:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * To elaborate, every edit that is made on the wiki has to be checked by an admin or patroller and labeled as good, or fixed up. That's called patrolling... So because of your many great edits you've been promoted to autopatrol, which means that your edits don't need to be checked or patrolled. It means you're a reliable editor. If only all editors were like you, it'd be a lot easier for all us staff. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 07:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ahh, I see, so there's less chance my edits will be scrutinized when I vandalize, right? Excellent.... I mean--! Jimbo Jambo 20:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Hahaha! Doing that will just get you a ban....So, you better not ;) {{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 21:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, we still see them anyway. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 21:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, but I could mark them as minor edits and claim I was fixing links or something boring like that. Jimbo Jambo 22:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * We look at the changes, not the edit description... Nice try though...{{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 22:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * You seriously check every single edit? Then I guess there isn't much good in promoting people to autopatrol, is there? :P Jimbo Jambo 23:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Not me personally... but at least one staff. The point is, even if an admin started vandalizing, we'd soon know. You're keen about this hey?{{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 00:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Heh, if I really wanted to vandalize, I'd at least have the sense to do it anonymously, and probably from a public computer at a library or something. Not that I do, of course. Jimbo Jambo 00:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * This guys got pro experience... :P ;){{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 01:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Yey, I don't want to sound rude or anything but you might want to remove your comment about vandalizing Zeldapedia. I know it was a joke but if a Zeldapedia member came across that they could be offended.--Link hero of light 02:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

What comment?{{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * That is what I would like to know.{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 04:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The one you just removed (your both joking right?:)).--Link hero of light 15:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah... it's what you asked for isn't it?{{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 22:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. I just didn't think it was as very good idea. --Link hero of light 00:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Long time no see, you just sort of... vanished :'( 19:00, January 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Eh, sorry. I have serious wanderlust when it comes to video games, and as my interests change so do the sites I visit. I haven't been to Pikipedia in a while either, which is a shame considering it was my first wiki experience. Rest assured though I never stay away from something for too long, and I'll always be lurking somewhere in the bowels of the internet, waiting for the perfect opportunity to stir up debates about popular fan theories. Jimbo Jambo 19:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Understandable. Anyways, hope to see you around here ;) 23:49, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

What up?
Hey, I see you split Tailsparan/Dexivine. I just wanted to ask you to make sure that you place the relevant information in the new article FIRST. It's not good to just have information disappear, even if we know it isn't vandalism. So just make sure to save the new article before the old one, next time. You can even leave it open in one tab waiting to save it to make it easier :) Anyhow, keep up the good work! 20:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I was working in separate windows, but for whatever reason decided to save my revision to Tailpasaran first. I can see where you're coming from and I'll try to be more attentive to that in the future. Sorry about that. Jimbo Jambo 20:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem! It's just like a courtesy to readers, y'know? 21:38, 13 January 2010 (UTC)