Talk:Captain Keeta

They should be merged under the name Skull Keeta

Sure.
Let's go with that.

Yep
I'm good with that.

All anonymous people happy now?IfIHaveTo 08:12, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Move
I'd say we should move this to Captain Keeta. He is referred to in the game as either Skull Keeta or Captain Keeta, but never as Captain Skull Keeta. It isn't really appropriate to include "Skull" in the name. 16:36, November 25, 2008 (UTC)
 * Besides the quote on the page, here is the other three times he is mentioned by name in the game.

"Ohhh! Keeta! Is it not Captain Keeta?!?"

- King Igos du Ikana

"Captain's Hat Wear it with (C) to pose as Captain Keeta."

- N/A "It seems Skull Keeta, Captain of the Skull Knights, had the Captain's Hat..."

- N/A


 * So, clearly, it is not "Captain Skull Keeta". 16:46, November 25, 2008 (UTC)


 * Seeing as how neither the Daphnes Nohansen Hyrule or the Igos du Ikana articles include the characters' ranks/positions in their titles, this article should probably go the same way. I vote to move it to Skull Keeta, as his name without his rank. Jimbo Jambo 21:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Nnnh, I have to disagree. I rather think that articles SHOULD have the full character names with their ranks in there. Princess Ruto follows this. As DID Darmani before Matt moved it for a dumb and totally lame reason (YEAH THAT'S RIGHT I SAID IT). 18:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Omit the characters' ranks/positions.....?? Three words about this: What. The. Heck? I think we need the ranks/positions included in the titles. So yes, I'm against this idea.


 * P.S. Forgive my bluntness but, this just sounds like a dumb idea. One that is going to start a debate, and have little outcome.

We don't need the ranks/positions in most cases. The one and only case where we absolutely need this is on the Princess Zelda page. On all other pages, we should go with what is most efficient. Meaning what will be searched for most. So Princess Ruto should be just "Ruto" and this article should be  Captain Keeta as that is the name most used in game. And Darmani stays where it is. I had good reason for it. First of all, no encyclopedia will ever have anything like "the third" in title unless necessary to differentiate from another person. It is not necessary in this case. Therefore it is best not to have it in the title. It makes the page look cleaner and it helps out the site on search engines. 22:33, January 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * I beg to differ, Matt. But, I just can't see the point to omit the ranks/positions. It is only going to cause confusion. What about the people who, don't know the character's name, but know the title? This is just an example...I know it has happened to me on several occasions. Getting rid of the ranks/positions just seem really....stupid and silly.