User talk:Mmmmm PIE@legacy41957525

Possible Timeline
Many agree with you, while many others believe that Nintendo has long since stopped considering AoL when planning their games, and, in no longer accounting for the Sleeping Zelda Legend, have overwritten it. Its a divided issue, which is why the wiki itself takes no particular stance on it, but personally I lean away from your interpretation.

To be completely sound, a theory which places the Sleeping Zelda at the begining of the timelie requires what is known as a "Two Kings interpretation" of the AOL backstory. One must assume that the King who fathered the sleeping Zelda is a different person from the King who hid the Triforce of Courage in the northern palace... though there is much in the AOL instruction booklet to suggest they are the same (suugest, but not prove).

Without this assumption, an early sleeper timeline just won't work... and it simply not an assumption I'm a fan of.

IM?
Hey, pie, got an IM address? :P --Jase 20:07, 29 August 2007 (EDT)


 * Yarp; I'm 'mmmmmm PIE eh' on AIM and use mmmmm__PIE@hotmail.com for MSN, though I only ever log on when using my home PC, which is only usually for ~15 minutes a day. That my change when I head up to Edmonton on Friday, towards more MSN use and less AIM. --PIE