Zelda Wiki:Featured Article Nomination

= Currently Nominated =

Gerudo
Very nice article, more of the work of (the sadly absent) IfIHaveTo. Although the references are slightly excessive IMO ;) —Adam (talk) 17:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) All Zelda fans know about the Triforce, but some of the newer fans probably don't know much about the Gerudo race. I think the Triforce is very important, but more people would learn more with this article. --Triforceboy4 21:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) It's an interesting article. Maybe a few too many references, but. I'll give it my vote. --Yuvorias, 9:49, 30 May 2008 (EST)
 * 3) I'm just glad that someone is putting something up about the Gerudo. I've been searching for information from them for some time.--Ausaka, 23:50, 30 May 2008 (EST)
 * 4) I second this. I think this race is just too important not to at least be notified on the front page. ZeldaGirl96 22:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm with Triforceboy4. This is an interesting read and very informative. I didn't even know what the Gerudo race was. It deserves to be a Featured Article.
 * :O Not nominated yet?! Well here's a vote! Besides, very informative article :D 13:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) This is an excellent example of what an article should be. It has many references. The sections are long and detailed. The references in this article are also excellent examples of what the Cite Template is now capable of doing. This article, along with the Ganon article, was actually the incentive for the new features that were added to the Cite Template earlier today... wait, I guess with UTC it is yesterday. This article deserves featured status. 03:22, July 4, 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) This article needs to be nominated. It has been up for nearly three months, is very informative, and is well cited.--Rdnckj258 22:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Well wrote and presented
 * 4) This article is one of the most important articles because I almost had no idea who Gerudos were until I read the Gerudo article. That is why I am voting for the Gerudo article to be the featured article.--Akki 20:44, 12 July 2008 (EST)

Medli
A really good article with lots of refrences.--Link hero of light 17:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) This article has lot of references and it deserves the place.
 * 2) Alright, fine. I'm not going to waste my July vote, so I'll cast it for Medli. It's about as long as it's going to get without becoming tedious. --Felicia's Champion, 16:29, 16 July 2008 (EST)


 * 1) Hmm... This article doesn't have a lot of references. It is mostly references. It is much too short to be a featured article.--Matt 13:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

The Golden Goddesses
An important article explaining an important part of all Zelda Games 12:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) Now this is an interesting nomination! I'd almost forgotten about this one, and it does tick a lot of boxes. Most of the content is down to one particularly dedicated editor, who did a very nice job - I'd say this ticks all the right boxes :) 18:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) First, let me tell you that I was molgeratwinmold99 but I forgot my password :P But anyway, even if they're mentioned or not, Naryu, Din, and Farore are worth a featured article. Molgeratwinmold55 13:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I think it's a very good article; it deserves to be featured! --Emeryn 23:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Could have a pic of Nayru's statue, but a good article anyway --Bolter1


 * 1) Not until a picture for Nayru is included. --Felicia's Champion, 20:45, 15 July 2008 (EST)
 * 2) I like this article a lot but it's divided too much and it's kind of messed up. --Gluemann267

Twilight Realm
This article thoroughly explains Twilight and it's many facets. --User:Pawtamus, 10:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) I really like this article. Since I've been here, this article has caught my I the most. --Gluemann267
 * 2) It may not have references and it may be quite short, but I believe that this mystical Twilight Realm is a key point in Twilight Princess and their would be no storyine without Twilight. This article is short, sweet, and to the point, and yet, it is very informative. --weyes Ise


 * 1) Short, no references. I don't think this should be featured. --Felicia's Champion, 9:50, 16 July 2008 (EST)
 * 2) Not long enough. Not enough sources. Not that interesting. Not formated correctly. Not that important. Not a chance of being featured. 06:57, July 16, 2008 (UTC)

= Previously Featured Articles =

(Voting Archive) (Failed Nominations) The featured articles are listed in this format: Articles that have been disqualified are in the format:
 * Name of Article (Date it became featured)
 * Name of Article (Date it became featured) (Date disqualified)

Here are the featured articles: 
 * The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (N/A) (May 27, 2008)


 * Zelda Timeline (N/A) (May 27, 2008)


 * Ganon (N/A)


 * Boomerang (N/A)


 * Stalfos (July 7, 2007)


 * ZeldaInformer (August 1, 2007) (June 12, 2008)


 * Lake Hylia (October 2, 2007)


 * Zant (October 16, 2007)


 * Dark Link (November 5, 2007)


 * Link (December 15, 2007)


 * Princess Zelda (January 28, 2008)


 * Link's Crossbow Training (February 13, 2008)


 * Dodongo (February 15, 2008)


 * Moblin (February 18, 2008)


 * Majora's Mask (Boss) (March 8, 2008)


 * Pedestal of Time (April 6, 2008)


 * Triforce (May 17, 2008)


 * Midna (June 12, 2008)


 * Master Sword (June 17, 2008)