Talk:Woods

Merge with "Forest"
I can't think of a good reason why "woods" and "forest" need to have separate pages just because we have two terms in English with overlapping definitions that refer to them. There's no consistent difference between the locations with "woods" in the name and those with "forest" in the name, and it would just make more sense and be more convenient to have a single page listing all such locations in this series, with one or the other term as a redirect. (I'd lean toward "forest" as the page name and "woods" as the redirect.) --Osteoderm Jacket 06:16, 8 July 2012 (EDT)


 * Sounds like a good plan to me. 08:45, 8 July 2012 (EDT)


 * I should probably know this by now, but how much approval/consensus should I look for before going ahead and merging pages? --Osteoderm Jacket 21:52, 17 July 2012 (EDT)


 * I agree with this merge. Merging these two pages would just be common sense, as they share very similar information. Noble Wrot 14:58, 23 July 2012 (EDT)