Talk:Ocean

Content
The only page that links to here is The Adventure of Link page, under the locations listing. But it and several other locations within that listing got me thinking: are these actual titles of locations, or did whoever wrote that just say "uh, well, there's an ocean? so it's a location"? I'd like to have this clarified by anyone who's beaten Zelda II so that we can decide on either re-writing this article to match its applicableness to Zelda II, or have it re-direct to something else altogether. A overall article on "oceans" strikes me as just as useless as the Lava article (not that this isn't well written, mind you!). --Ando 13:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, it is small enough. It really isn't a problem. We could have this one and the lava one link to relevant Wikipedia article. Some people might not know what these mean. Yes, believe or not there are actually people that dumb.--Mjr162006 13:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Maybe linking to an outside source would be better..--Paulreilly86


 * Still, we need to think about the Zelda II listing. Anyone who scrolls through there and thinks "Oh, there's a place called 'ocean' in Zelda II, let's see what it's like" and comes here is going to be surprised to find only a definition of "ocean". So is the listing correct or should the "ocean" link there be removed? But then there would be nothing linking to this page... --Ando 14:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)