Talk:Bubble

Article is ordered awkwardly. (Legend of Zelda, then to Ocarina of Time, and back to Adventure of Link). Adventure of Link area needs to be expanded as all that is stated is that there are larger bubbles. However, these bubbles are drastically different since they can be defeated and they steal magic, experience points, and health if you get hit by them. (If I remember correctly) Perhaps a division between the the different games, or time periods of the games, or by variations. Some sort of expansion is definitely needed. Perhaps even additional images/screenshots from the later incarnations of this enemy. Mases 03:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * This page has been barely touched since the above message was posted. I really think this page needs to be split up. For one, I was going through and adding Oracle of Ages enemies to the Wiki and I noticed that 'Whisp' re-directs to 'Bubble'. However, in the game, they are completely different enemies. This page looks so clunky that I think Whisp should be completely split away. Something needs to be done about how it is organized. Either by Type or Game. Perhaps because there is so much information on this page, splitting the types of Bubbles into their own pages might be a better option. Mases 17:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I did what I could, and I think it's organized at least a little better now. I didn't have images or a lot of information for certain topics, but I'm sure others can add. Ancblue52 08:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

How is it now? I've organized it by type of Bubble rather than by game and then by type. Can the 'in need of attention' tag now be removed? If everyone is okay with this article other than a few minor things, that is. Ancblue52 22:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I think that this looks grand, sir. I'm not entirely sure what exactly a Whisp is or how truly different from a Bubble they are, so I won't state any opinion on whether that section should be separated from this page or not (can anyone provide some more info on WHAT THE HECK A WHISP IS), but the rest of the page is excellent. Tag removed. 04:57, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I will say w00t, if I may. However, about the Whisp, it is depicted. It's difficult to say whether it satisfies the definition of a Bubble (an animated skull), since it is apparently a skull in appearance, but it could just be some sort of electrical field imitating a skull. I don't personally see the need for a whole separate article on a Whisp, since it is a variation of a Bubble (in my opinion), but if someone else has strong Whisp feelings, it's not really up to me, then. Ancblue52 05:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

I think if "Winged Octorok" has it's own page... So should "Whisp"... --With respect and humility, Alliram 15:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It already had its own page, but the consensus was to merge them. Splitting them up again would be pointless 01:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Though I'm sure there's probably some reason behind it, I didn't see it while reading, so I must ask: Why are the Red Bubbles and the Fire Bubbles separate? They both spawn from heat and fire, pretty much light Link on fire, and are red. It's probably just my OCD talking, but why don't we combine the sections into one, state that both names kinda apply, and then have one nice neat red/fire section? Unless there's a good reason that I'm missing, which does happen... And the file RedBubbleOoT.gif looks rather...photoshopped to me. The background fire/red stuff just looks like a GIMP pattern painted behind it. Am I crazy for seeing it like this or does anyone else agree. And if so, does anyone have a better screenshot to use? I just don't like it... 03:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, this page is pretty bad. If anyone takes up the challenge I want to add that too much of the article is strategy guidish. I'll vote to combine the red and fire sections and rename the section titles to fit. As far as splitting the page I think if it's done then it should just go to the Wisp page and keep the cross references. 02:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)