User talk:Nathan747@legacy41957787

Do you honestly expect me to be pleasant? This is the millionth time this year ZW has spammed and or complained at our wiki, yet whenever we complain we get no results. Either you start listening to us, or we will never listen to a thing you say again. --EDJoe45 00:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

If you don't listen to us. I don't want to see ZWG on ZP ever again. In fact, create a new one, from a different user.Wowzeras 00:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I do not expect you guys to pleasant. I have decided to get personally involved to end all this shit, and all I can say is to keep bring the complaints to me and will make sure we respond accordingly. The staff does need to shape up in our relations with you and I am looking to improve the effort. Nathan Nathanial Rumphol-Janc 00:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Honestly I don't really care if you take our work. The only time I bring that up is when you come after us. If the wiki as a whole comes to a conclusion on something they want done I will tell you, but now that this has seemed to be resolved, I'll hold my breath on everything I planned to use against you. --EDJoe45 00:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This goes likewise with images etc.Wowzeras 00:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Likewise, I don't care if you take our work, so long as it's the work that is freely available under fair use. Our staff needs to stop what they are doing and take the higher ground. Frankly, I think we can agree that both sides have showed flaws in this seemingly never ending war between the sites and it's time we both cleaned up our acts. This is not how either side wants to be represented: Looking like whining babies. Nathan Nathanial Rumphol-Janc 00:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Totally. I'm not going to point-take anymore, on who did what, and who did what first. I just want all the drama to end!Wowzeras 00:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

My talk page
I think it's safe to unprotect it now. EDJoe and Wowzeras have calmed, and I don't think they'll spam and flame anymore. Thanks. 19:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * It is done, and I agree that it has come to a end. I had a nice chat with Ed and got some things straightened out on both sides. Nathanial Rumphol-Janc 22:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If I may interject, his ZP username is EveryDayJoe45(Joe for short), and he probably just went with the shortest possible name, whilst keeping it himself. Ed can work, but I'm a bit bemused by it.Wowzeras 01:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Huh. Interesting...Anyways, thanks again for helping me with the protection. It's probably also safe to unprotect Alter's talk page, as well, as we both had ours protected for the same reason. 04:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Featured Article Nomination - Sacred Realm
Hi Nathan, do you think if you have time that you could look over the Sacred Realm article and perhaps cast a vote for its featured status nomination? You can find it here  and your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Chris Link87 02:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Username
Hello, there is a wikipedia user also called Nathan, is that you? Wikipedia user Nathanr is also known on many other wikis as Nathan. -- 02:48, 25 November 2011 (EST) 06:56, 22 January 2011 (EST)
 * Sorry for intervening, but Nathan is not active on this wiki anymore. He had left the site a few months ago, and he's currently affiliated with Zeldapedia. Feel free to contact him talk:Nathanial_Rumphol-Janc here, or here. -- 03:15, 25 November 2011 (EST)


 * No, I'm not that Nathan. Sorry to burst your bubble. K2L - love yah brah, but just because I associate with another wiki doesn't mean I don't still lurk my old stomping grounds. Peace and love. Nathanial Rumphol-Janc 03:25, 25 November 2011 (EST)
 * Didn't know, sorry. -- 03:47, 25 November 2011 (EST)