Talk:Skull Woods (A Link to the Past)

It's called the Skeleton Forest. The dungeon's name is Skull Woods 21:04, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, you're right! The Wiki mislabeled it as Skull Dungeon, so I guess we're just gonna have to fix that. Dany36 21:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Classification
Shouldn't this dungeon also be classified as an earth dungeon. It seems to fit the description in Earth Dungeon, being underground and all


 * I don't think that's enough to consider it an Earth Dungeon. If every underground dungeon was an earth dungeon, there would be a loooot of earth dungeons. 19:58, 4 May 2012 (EDT)


 * Well, that's not the only thing that would make it en earth dungeon. Here's from the earth dungeon classification: "Earth dungeons are known for their dark, damp environment and organic, vegetative architecture". To me, the Skull woods seem to fit that perfectly (granted, the vegetation consist mostly of withered vines, but that just makes it even more "earth" than "forest"). On the other hand, it's currently classified as a forest dungeon, but to me the only thing "foresty" about it is that it happens to be located in a forest, the dungeon itself isn't any more "forest" than it is "earth". Another thing I'm basing my opinion on is that Skull woods has a lot more in common with The Wind Waker's Earth dungeon than it has with any of the other forest dungeons in the series.--Lennholm 09:28, 5 May 2012 (EDT)
 * Frankly, the Earth Temple is more of a "Shadow" dungeon than it is anything else. The fact that this dungeon is so intimately connected to the forest makes it a Forest themed dungeon, and the skulls and skeletons on the walls and the Gibdo make it a Shadow dungeon. Don't forget that the boss is Mothula, another enemy intimately linked to forest dungeons. To be honest, I'm not sure what an "Earth" dungeon even is, personally I think we should scrap it as an element (the only Earth Temples in the series are both Shadow and Fire based), but hey, I'm not fond of classifying dungeons by element in general anyway. Usually it's all in the name, otherwise it's subjective. 13:26, 15 August 2012 (EDT)
 * Yeah, this isn't an "earth dungeon" any more than like half the dungeons in the series are. Also, the the "organic, vegetative architecture" bit should never have been part of the description on the Earth Dungeon page; it didn't describe any of what was actually listed there. I think I've brought this up elsewhere, but I agree with Fizzle: "earth dungeon" is a really poorly defined category and we probably shouldn't be using it as a dungeon classification. It's not a distinct, well-defined dungeon archetype in this series the way "fire dungeon", "water dungeon", "ice dungeon", and the like are. Most of the examples are also fire dungeons, many of the characteristic features overlap with those of fire dungeons, and the few that don't have these traits have very little in common. (Turtle Rock from A Link to the Past, being a rocky, cavern-like dungeon on a mountaintop with visible lava in some areas, is basically just a variation on, or marginal case of, the fire dungeon theme that happens not to have any interactable lava; Cave of No Return is a stage from a game that doesn't have a clear overworld-dungeon distinction and isn't obviously more dungeon-like than a number of other non-dungeon caves in the series; Fortress of Winds is a dungeon based around digging through loose earth with the Mole Mitts and it's not particularly similar to any one other dungeon in the series.)


 * That said, I'm not sure we should do away with the dungeon classifications entirely. There are some very clear recurring types of dungeon in the series, and it may be useful for some purposes to have examples of said archetypes listed somewhere on the wiki, whether it's on these dungeon listing pages or just on pages like Fire and Forest.--Osteoderm Jacket 15:01, 15 August 2012 (EDT)