User talk:Melchizedek1866@legacy41958488

 

Hacks
Should Zelda Wiki have a section for hacks? (While using Action Replay, Gameshark, etc.) 23:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * It sounds like a good idea. We've already got the pages Gameshark and Action Replay, but it would be good if Gameshark codes and stuff could be included. So I would say yes. 00:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * As you are likely going to see, I make a lot of hack pages. One for every Zelda game, and one for 'Noteable Hacks'.  I added as much detail as I could on each, but did not go any further.  I have yet to make a page for 'Disproved Hacks', 'Hack Project', and 'Hack Disclaimer Notes'.  Other then the notes, I am not sure if ZW.org needs the other two pages.  You can find the main hack page here.  The other ones (if you want to see them) you can simply search for in the search box; or by checking the recent changes page.  The main hacks page could need some cleaning up if you think so.  I want all information as formal as thoes on the glitch pages.  If you are going to edit it, then it must be a good thing. :P  02:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * That last line sounds like a compliment... so thanks. What you're doing looks great to me. I shall have a look over it and help you out as I can. For the time being, I have made the Hacks Template, and the Hacks Category, and appropriately put these on the pages. 06:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Do you think there should be a 'HackHead' banner? Or would it just be a waste?  Not many people are contributing, so I don't want space used up that could be used for other things to make two people look good...  15:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * At this stage I wouldn't rush into creating it, but if you are wanting to make it, definately go for it. 22:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Heck, I would make it if I could, and if I needed it. But, I don't.  I'll put it off for now.   23:53, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay... If you decide you want it, I'd be happy to make it! 02:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Dungeon Listing Template
We were once talking about having navigational templates for dungeon articles. The template could list two kinds of dungeons, Main Dungeons and Sub-Dungeons. I think that could work nicely.

So for Link's Awakening, here's how I'd like the template to look like...

Main Dungeons: Tail Cave, Bottle Grotto, Key Cavern, Angler's Tunnel, Catfish's Maw, Face Shrine, Eagle's Tower and Turtle Rock.

For Sub-Dungeons.... Moblin Hideout, Southern Face Shrine, Wind Fish's Egg and Color Dungeon.

I guess that could work... The Goron Moron 22:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Here it is.Template:Link's Awakening Dungeons What do you think?. Should I make one for every games dungeons? I'll let you assess it, and then we can add it to the appropriate pages! 05:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Missed a vital "s" there Mel. Made that seem really wrong. ;) 05:19, January 8, 2009 (UTC)


 * Embarrassing. Thanks! 05:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. That will work perfectly. I'm sure that we can get to templates for other dungeons later, whenever I work on them. The Goron Moron 08:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Sigh* Okay, I have absolutely no idea how to use templates. I fail at this, it just won't appear. The Goron Moron 08:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * You need some more confidence.. :-) All you have to do is type   near the pages bottom.  10:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, the gallery at the bottom of the page was improperly closed. It was eating it. 15:33, January 8, 2009 (UTC)

Solution
Hi, just responding to your question here. The problem you mentioned is caused by browser caching; basically Firefox stores a local cached copy of all the images you view on your PC (to save on page loading times), so even if the file has been changed on the server (in this case, with a new version) your browser still displays your locally cached file. This can quite easily be manually bypassed; just hold the Shift key and hit the Reload button (Crtl+Shift+R will also work). In this case, doing this while viewing you user page should have updated all the images in the page. The other option would be to hit Crtl+Shift+Del and clear your cache. 11:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay... thanks heaps for clearing that up. It makes sense now! :-) 22:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem, it kinda threw me too when I first noticed it! 22:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * And such a simple explanation too! Thanks again. 22:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

FW: Glitch Question
"Hi! I haven't really been paying that much attention to the glitch stuff to be honest, so I was wondering something; are we intending to remove all glitch information from articles, and have it only on the glitch pages? (See the comment I made here) 12:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)"

"I suppose we could remove the content, and put a "See Also _Glitches" part on the page. I will talk to Melchizedek (the head of the whole glitch project) to see what he thinks. 18:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

So, what do you think? 18:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The answer is yes. We are aiming to take glitches off all the other pages and link to them from other articles if they are more prominant glitches. For example, I've done that with the Fierce Deity Glitches. See here. 23:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Patrolling
Would you be up to being a Patroller? Let me know. 23:33, January 18, 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd love to be! 23:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Done dude. Just ask me here if you have any questions about it. 23:42, January 18, 2009 (UTC)


 * So just to check... I check over recent changes, look at recent edits with the red exclamation mark, and if they good edits, mark them as patrolled, if not, deal with them appropriately? 23:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yep. Once you had looked at them, always mark as patrolled. then edit if necessary. You should have a rollback button. That will revert all edits made by one person to the last edit made by someone else. So unless it is obvious nonsense or vandalism, don't use it. If it is just a simple mistake, use the normal undo feature. All patrol features are on the page diffs. 00:03, January 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. All pretty simple then... 00:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)