Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Link is NOT 10 years old. We do not know his age. Don't put false information up.

In the instruction booklet they estimated his age to be about 10 years old, basically puberty. Where he was inbetween a boy and a man. Estimates are for just getting an idea about what age he is at but shouldn't be taken as "hard true facts."

We can't say that all other zelda games following OoT "never reached the same level of originality" with their gameplay style. That is a matter of oppinion, and it's certainly not a consensus. That text should either be removed, or site a source.

But it says everywhere in the future (not in the game though) that link is seventeen, so logicly, he's 10, there no proof that he's not, anyway

I always imagined young link as 10 and adult link as 17, but that is just my opinion.--Claire 21:36, 10 December 2007 (EST)

Oh Yeah!
This is the best Zelda on my opinion. The thing 09:38, 10 March 2007 (CST)

I love it too! But Is there a game where he ever does find navi again? Oh, and by the way, did you know that it's already the most popular?--Eponasowner 14:37, 18 November 2007 (EST)

Article Overhaul
I just did a major overhaul of this article, improving it throughout with links, more details, etc...

If anyone wishes to add more, these parts of the plot could use furthur expansion:

1.)Death Mountain and Zora's Domain - Young Link

2.)Temples for Adult Link

3.)Perhaps even a section on some character details, other than Link, Zelda, Ganondorf and the Great Deku Tree. The sages immediately come to mind.67.160.13.15 01:27, 20 April 2007 (PDT)

Recent Edits
I don't agree with the recent removal of links from this article: history. As far as I'm concerned, the only valid reason to remove a link is if it is factually incorrect. Personally, I would have simply reverted the edits if they didn't contain useful grammatical fixes. I propose that the links be reinserted, any opinions? --Adamcox82 00:13, 7 August 2007 (PDT)


 * Uh... sorry, it's been awhile since I've checked here...


 * Actually, many of the links that were removed were originally put in by me when I first added all the story content. (When I did that, I did not have this account, so it was anonymous.  Since that time, I have edited many more articles in other wikis and have found that it is best to only link to another article once per page, when the name of said article is mentioned.  That way, all the articles throughout don't become bogged down with multiple links to the same page, which can more easily than you might think.  Anyway, those are my thoughts on it. Pel&#39;marn Dakari 03:04, 12 October 2007 (EDT)

Weird
This game has blood and violence and it was just Rated E. Paper Jorge

Technically, no. in latter versions, it's rated T.--Eponasowner 14:39, 18 November 2007 (EST)

I have every version of it, they all say "E" so I think you are confused.


 * The above is true. None of the games have been re-rated. It's been stated (by Nate Bihldorf, I think) that if OoT had had better graphics, it totally would have been a T, but it didn't, so... It's E. --Ando 04:53, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Beta Zelda
shouldn't the beta zelda OOT be included in this article

I see your point, but i don't know much about it so I can't fix it.


 * Old conversation, but I feel the need to butt in here. No, not really. Every game ever has a beta version, so Ocarina's isn't any more "important" or noteworthy. The only beta things that should be added are specific things such as on the Sage Medallions article. --Ando 04:53, 24 May 2008 (UTC)