Talk:Oracle Confusion

How can LA be a sequal to LttP when the Hyrule in LttP is entirely landlocked.
 * By that reasoning, AoL could not possibly be a sequl to LoZ (northern Hyrule is not reachable in LoZ, nor shown on its map), MM could not possibly be a sequel to OOT (Termina is again, unreachable and invisble in Ocarina), and FS and FSA would be totally irreconciable (Their maps have nothing in common). If Link continues to walk to in any direction, he will eventually leave the AlttP map. -PIE
 * OMG! HOW COULD YOU SAY THAT!! I AM SO OFFENDED!!! THERE IS ENOUGH SPACE ON A CARTRDIDGE TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE ZELDA UNIVERSE SO IF THEY AREN'T ACCESSIBLE THEY OBVIOUSLY DO NOT EXIST!!!1!!!one!!!eleventy-one!!!
 * Ahem.
 * I once had somebody argue to me that the later Baum books should not be considered canonical to 'The Wizard of Oz' because several of the places mentioned did not accord with the original descriptions of Oz. I'm still stunned at the stupidity of people. Thesubrosian 21:21, 7 January 2007 (CST)

i was not talking about how you cant SEE the shore i was talking about how at the edges of the map all you can see is sher cliffs. and didnt the people see Link off, i MIGHT belive that link climbed that impassible terrain while carrying a boat no less, but his entourage i think not. furthermore i have never believed that AoL came directly after TLoZ, and as for MM in the begining we see him in the lost woods he follows the skull kid and then falls in to a hole in the tree at wich point we see some sort of portal or time warp thingy and the ending is also unclear how, if at all, he gets back to hyrule so MM could have been a dream for all we know. --Spirit of the Legend 21:24, 12 January 2007 (CST)