Talk:Air Cannon

Hmm...this is pretty small. Methinks it would do better as a part of the cannon page instead of having its own tiny article. Thoughts? 00:11, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Definitely. Horrible image, also... and, given the size of the article, it would be pretty easy to merge.

Of course, I have no idea how to merge two articles, otherwise I would be done already. 02:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I would be more in favor of simply improving the article rather than immediately merging, at the very least. I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to get a better image, for one thing. Plus I'm pretty sure there's even some dialogue pertaining to them. If the article is still too small to warrant it's own page, then sure. That's my logic anyway. 02:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merging seems like a good idea for now. I'd rather we do something about this pitiful article now than wait for an improvement that might not come for a long time (unless there are any volunteers?) I say merge it now and if and when the content gets seriously improved, then we'll be in a better position to judge whether it deserves its own article or not. Personally, I could see the Air Cannon fitting very nicely in that reorganized version of the Cannon page that Cip mentioned a couple years ago... 03:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, it's fairly low down on my own priorities so I can't offer to fix it up right now, but I can possibly grab a sprite of it if I get a chance at least. Hm, is Air Cannon even it's official name? 03:25, 1 December 2012 (UTC)