Talk:Hylia

Left handed Hylia
[] at 19:34, you can clearly see that she is lefthanded. Can you change it back, please? --Link, the Hero of Light 13:06, 1 February 2012 (EST)
 * That would contradict the images we have in the article (such as the one shown in the introduction), so really, we can't tell for sure. She might have been ambidextrous or something. :P --Dany36 13:16, 1 February 2012 (EST)
 * Yes, your right, it might be xD. But maybe we should add it at Trivia, that the pictures of her shows her both right- and left hand? --Link, the Hero of Light 13:19, 1 February 2012 (EST)

Lorulean Counterpart?
There's obviously not a whole lot of outright information in support of this, but might it nonetheless be worth mentioning that Hylia may have had a Lorulean counterpart? In Hyrule, of course, the Royal Family was descended from Hylia, and given that Hilda shares so many characteristics with Zelda- including magical abilities- it would make sense that she too had a divine heritage. Setras (talk) 05:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * They also have a Triforce, and we've been told in the past that Termina was created by the Goddesses too (erg...), so it's more likely she's just in both universes.KrytenKoro (talk) 17:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * But Lorule, canonically speaking, isn't Termina (and I've never heard anything canon that says the goddesses made the latter anyway), and regardless, we don't know precisely how its creation occurred- hypothetically, the Golden Goddesses could have Lorulean equivalents, too. More to the point, Hylia can only exist in one universe- the one containing Hyrule- because the Zelda of SS is Hylia. So unless SS Zelda could move between the worlds at will, and had an affair in Lorule that eventually spawned the Lorulean Royal Family while simultaneously founding what would become the Hyrulean one- an unlikely sequence of events, to say the least- she can't be related to the former. Unless I misunderstood you and you meant that there was one Hylia in each universe... but wouldn't this ultimately come to the same thing as having a counterpart? Not to mention be kind of aesthetically unpleasing, given that the other Lorulean counterparts shown aren't exact replicas of the Hyruleans? Setras (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Nope. She's a goddess, so there's (1) no reason to expect that she is limited to one dimension, especially given that her creation, the Master Sword, is able to see through and navigate time, and one of her descendants, OoT Zelda, is able to split the timeline; and (2) no reason to expect that Hilda is a descendant of Hylia or any hypothetical counterpart.
 * Basically, there is nothing in the game suggesting or requiring that Hylia has a counterpart, so any claim that one is implied would be equivalent to claiming that Termina or Lorule must have an equivalent of the Helmaroc or Midna.KrytenKoro (talk) 21:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Moving through time, in and of itself, is not the same thing as multiversal travel. In OoT, for example, the Master Sword does move with Link, but that's because he's basically moving through a wormhole with a point of origin in the Unified timeline, and a terminal point in the Adult timeline. Drawing the Master Sword opens the wormhole at its point of origin, while replacing it opens the wormhole at its terminal point. The Master Sword at both ends of the wormhole is the same object, physically moving to and from the past and future. At the end of OoT, however, Zelda sends Link back in time, past the wormhole's point of origin, and in the process leaves the Master Sword behind. In this instance, the Master Sword cannot, and does not, move through time- the Master Swords on each end are parallel counterparts, not the same object.
 * Meanwhile, Zelda splitting the timeline would've simply been a result of her utilizing "curved" time, a dimension of time that exists outside of linear time. Her power as a Sage, combined with the power of the Ocarina, would've been enough to remove him from the Adult timeline, and move him through curved time to before the aforementioned wormhole's point of origin.
 * Lorule, while it is parallel to Hyrule, is not a part of the timeline split, and so unlike the three parallel Hyrules, which are separated by curved time, Lorule is separated from Hyrule by a fourth spacial dimension. From there, we have the fact that every major figure in Hyrule is shown to have a counterpart. We know nothing of Hilda's bloodline, but if we were to trace it back far enough, the Lorulean Royal Family would need to have a founder. And given that Hilda displays magical power, just as the Hyrulean Royal Famiky does, it would therefore be logical- hypothetical, but logical, nonetheless- to assume that both Royal Families were founded by goddesses- Hylia for the Hyrulean, and "Lylia" for the Lorulean. Setras (talk) 21:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * My main point is that, if you look at the split timelines, technically we have three separate Triforces -- and yet no implication of multiple sets of Golden Goddesses, since they created the universes and laws of time that split in the first place. Hylia manifested in Hyrule, which is canon, but even supposing that she also manifested in Lorule, there's no reason to require an explicitly divine being, shown to have the power to warp time and space and splinter timelines, to have distinct counterparts in each universe she manifests in.
 * Nearly everything you just said was completely of your own invention, and purely speculation. My point, again, is that there is no actual evidence to base your assertion on -- you're fully in fanfic territory here, way past the realm of fan theories.
 * On point, though, is this claim: "From there, we have the fact that every major figure in Hyrule is shown to have a counterpart."
 * And that's simply not true. Beyond the fact that it's never indicated that the Lorule Triforce represents different goddesses, we have the huge blinking light of the Sages -- the game in fact explicitly states that there aren't Lorulian counterparts for them, not even just as normal, non-chosen people (ex. Gulley).
 * Are there counterparts at all? Shonuff. Is it strictly 1:1? Absolutely not, and explicitly so. Is there any reason to believe or require that deities who explicitly have power over time and space would be beholden to any counterpart rule that does exist? 100% no, there's no indication of that in the game. Fan theories should be attempts to explain questions not answered in the series, not outright fanfiction with the vague handwave of "it's not explicitly said to be false, even if the evidence is against it."KrytenKoro (talk) 23:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Why is mentioning a Lorulian equivalent of Hylia different from any other Zelda character? Why not mention that a Lorulian doppelgänger of Vaati or the Poe Merchant might exist as well? We don't because that would flood the articles with useless fanon. There is no evidence that there are doppelgangers of everyone in Lorule (or to be technical, whether or not there are any doppelgangers at all, as we only see a couple people that look like people from Hyrule). The fact that Lorule clearly has a different history than Hyrule makes it possible that a "Lolia" never even existed. But that is speculating, and is exactly what we don't need on our articles. Champion of Nayru (talk) 23:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * ^^Just two things: first off, the points I brought up weren't of my own invention, or at least the mechanics behind them weren't- things like curved time, wormholes, and higher dimensions are actual principles of quantum mechanics and theoretical physics, with real-life basis, and Nintendo already made use of similar principles with the Downfall timeline (which is an example of the "many worlds" mechanism in action). Also, yes, the timeline split would not create another set of goddesses, because all three universes created from the split have a common origin (which happens to be with said goddesses). Lorule, however, is an entirely different universe altogether that was created separately from the timeline split, so it could, and probably does, have entirely different creator(s). Other than that, point taken I suppose. Setras (talk) 00:29, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * That they apply at all to Zelda is your invention, is what I meant. Unless previously specified in the story, it's already a pretty weak claim to say that real-world anything applies to Zelda.KrytenKoro (talk) 03:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)