Zelda Wiki:Featured Article Nomination

= Currently Nominated =

The Golden Goddesses
An important article explaining an important part of all Zelda Games. UPDATE: Nayru's Statue now included. 12:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) Now this is an interesting nomination! I'd almost forgotten about this one, and it does tick a lot of boxes. Most of the content is down to one particularly dedicated editor, who did a very nice job - I'd say this ticks all the right boxes :) 18:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) First, let me tell you that I was molgeratwinmold99 but I forgot my password :P But anyway, even if they're mentioned or not, Naryu, Din, and Farore are worth a featured article. Molgeratwinmold55 13:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I think it's a very good article; it deserves to be featured! --Emeryn 23:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Could have a pic of Nayru's statue, but a good article anyway --Bolter1
 * 5) It's definitely a good article, and not only does it show off the triangle of the goddesses, but also all of the triangles in the game, and how they're linked together to each other. --Sk8torchic 12:21, 5 August 2008
 * 6) The article is full of information of great quality, great pictures. It is absolutely worth the Featured status. --Mariofan9 18:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) i love the Golden Goddesses!CoreyPotter 17:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) Not until a picture for Nayru is included. --Felicia's Champion, 20:45, 15 July 2008 (EST)
 * 2) *Problem resolved, and vote withdrawn by Felicia's Champion. 01:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I like this article a lot but it's divided too much and it's kind of messed up. --Gluemann267
 * 4) Half the images in this article are not cited properly. Articles that don't have legitimate images are not worthy of featured status. Mases 20:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Veran
A little known boss among the majority of Zelda players here. Likely three or four of us have actually fought her. Her article is in much better shape than Onox's article. It fits the criteria. --Felicia&#39;s Champion 05:27, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) You've been working on this for a long time, Yuvorias, and your efforts have payed off. Very nice article. 12:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) A very good article, detailed, lengthy and well catergorized. A boss from one of the lesser known (but still very fun) games. An excellent choice for a featured article.Poe 23:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I remember having to beat Veran, and I agree that she is a little known but still important villain. I think being a featured article will make more aware of her.Onen 21:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) A lesser known villain, but a very cool one, and a nice article to boot! One of my favorite final boss battles. --Majora'sMoonwalk 17:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) One the best bosses in the zelda series, i think it was one of the best there could be for an article to feature.--Onox13 20:57, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) A great enemy in the Zelda series. It's sad she's not well-known. The article is great, supported with good images. Let's give it the featured status! --Mariofan9 08:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Tetraforce
i know its non-canon but its such a good article. well written and overall a perfect article. best on this whole site! remember the whole idea is to pick a well written article. it never said it was canon-exclusive. even fallen sage if its written well. some of you may be missing the point. NOBODY said it had to be canon. forget canon. this is a great article. im suprised im the only one who picked this.Dragonstetraforce 23:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * No, its fan-made, a rumor theory thing. i dont think it should be nominated. Luroberto
 * 1) I concur, the Tetraforce theory is non-canon and should therefore not be a main article. Even though it is well written and all, there are still other articles that should get first priority. Angmar
 * 2) The fact of the matter is, that this theory has no place in Zelda, other than fan-made rumours. According to Shigeru and Nintendo, it does not exist, so why feature something that doesn't exist? And if you want another reason, some of the sections are very short, three lines or less. No sources either, which immediately prevents it from being featured. Plus, it's just not appealing to look at, with a single tiny image of the Hylian Shield. At best, we should give this a mention on the Triforce page, which is already featured. --Felicia&#39;s Champion 21:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

= Previously Featured Articles =

(Voting Archive) (Failed Nominations) The featured articles are listed in this format: Articles that have been disqualified are in the format:
 * Name of Article (Date it became featured)
 * Name of Article (Date it became featured) (Date disqualified)

Here are the featured articles: 
 * The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (N/A) (May 27, 2008)


 * Zelda Timeline (N/A) (May 27, 2008)


 * Ganon (N/A)


 * Boomerang (N/A)


 * Stalfos (July 7, 2007)


 * ZeldaInformer (August 1, 2007) (June 12, 2008)


 * Lake Hylia (October 2, 2007)


 * Zant (October 16, 2007)


 * Dark Link (November 5, 2007)


 * Link (December 15, 2007)


 * Princess Zelda (January 28, 2008)


 * Link's Crossbow Training (February 13, 2008)


 * Dodongo (February 15, 2008)


 * Moblin (February 18, 2008)


 * Majora's Mask (Boss) (March 8, 2008)


 * Pedestal of Time (April 6, 2008)


 * Triforce (May 17, 2008)


 * Midna (June 12, 2008)


 * Master Sword (June 17, 2008)


 * Gerudo (July 21, 2008)


 * Darknut (August 30, 2008)