Zelda Wiki:Featured Picture Nomination/Archive

=Previously Featured Pictures=

2009
{{hide|header=Morpheel (June 30, 2009)
 * content=

Morpheel
Okay, I was asked to nominate this one. It is a good image. It is large and highly detailed. It's pretty good. Worthy of being featured. 19:54, November 19, 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) A lot of detail has gone into this image, even though it wasn't one of my favorite bosses its still a worthy picture.--Makar11 19:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I enjoy the flavour of the colour it presents an old apperance--Zanramon 20:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)it has detail and its nice
 * 3) We do have alot of Twilight Princess pictures featured but this a very detailed image.--Link hero of light 01:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) This image is an accurate reprisentation on how the boss looks ingame and is strikingly detailed--L285 19:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) I think it is detailed nice and it is agood pic and boss.--Midna1 02:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) This is a very good picture of this particular boss. The lighting shows every detail of this water beast. Definetly should be featured.--Nintendo_Master 03:15, 05 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) I think it is great, very detailed and better quality. --Link6767 12:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Since my suggestion has been met, I'll vote for this now. The image is definitely better quality and size. Not to mention, Morpheel was a good boss.  00:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) I would like to fight this boss. im almost there... its a really good, cool-looking picture. Qloob 11 22:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Qloob 11
 * 10) I remember fighting this boss he was very interesting but to this day I still love the way this picture makes him look. Heroofstuff 15:37 June 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * Support


 * 1) This definatly depicts the boss extremely well. Just by looking at this picture you can imagine the boss swimming around.  (Unsigned vote by L33TSkillz - see rule 6 above)
 * 2) I think it is  a great detailed pic of this boss  it shows all of mophfeel--Bobbb 20:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Vote negated for abuse of multiple accounts. 20:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) It is a great it like you can see it the water a great and a detailed pic!!!--Kidd 21:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Vote negated for abuse of multiple accounts. 20:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) it is a great picture vey epic you see the whole boss.--Hi Vote negated for abuse of multiple accounts. 20:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Opposition


 * 1) A detailed picture to be sure... but it is not a very interesting image and not the greatest boss. I do not believe it is feature-worthy.--HeroOfTheWinds10 19:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I agree, its a good picture and all but nothing is really going on its just Morpheel on a white background... Im sure if you tried looking you could find a more worthy picture of him to be featured but this one just doesnt cut it.--Kresh64 01:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Above votes negated per opposition guidelines at the top of the page.  01:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I find the picture extremely boring. It doesn't show Morpheel's home terrain and looks fake because it's computer generated. It is highly detailed, but it looks like a sandworm because it's out of the water. Gives me the wrong impression, I had to do a double-take.  08:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Above vote negated per opposition guidelines at the top of the page.  19:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) The picture maybe a rendered version, but it's slightly bad quality. There is also a higher resolution on wikia.com found here. If we can get this rendered without the white, then it'll be good.  15:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC) I believe everything pointed out and requested in that opposition has been corrected and done. Therefore, the vote no longer applies.  00:06, May 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) This picture is rather uninteresting, and seems to lack color. Also, as Yusei said, there is a version with a higher res on wikia. It doesn't really seem "feature worthy" to me.  19:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Vote withdrawn by voter.  20:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) I think this image is to bland. It only shows his body, not how big he is in comparison to Link, not what terrain he is in, etc. --Purlo 15:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC) Above vote negated per opposition guidelines at the top of the page.  19:39, June 4, 2009 (UTC)

Everyone hold off one voting for this one either way for a while. We might be fixing some minor things with the image soon. 19:30, May 13, 2009 (UTC)


 * Matt, are you sure that you don't just want to freeze the voting since you were the one who nominated it, and it gets shot down with one more vote? :) Just playing. :D 19:37, 13 May 2009 (UTC)/


 * Okay, the new version is up. Bigger, better, brighter. Okay, mostly just bigger. Less blurry this time too. You may return to voting little peeps. 00:06, May 14, 2009 (UTC)

}}

{{hide|header=Zelda Wii (July 31, 2009)
 * content=

Zelda Wii
Leaked artwork from the upcoming game. It has a similar style to Twilight Princess and is very mysterious. It's also interesting Link isn't holding a sword.--Link hero of light 04:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) The image has little chance of it being a hoax anymore. Aside from that, it is a great size and quality. It is likewise a great painting, and having this as a featured picture is definitely worthwhile, as it depicts the current hot-topic of Zelda Wii, which people are interested in greatly. Has my support. 04:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I support Mases 04:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) It's probably real. It's similar to what the people who were able to attend to closed-door press conference described. An artist probably wouldn't have whipped it up so quickly, either. That point aside, it looks pretty darn awesome. Decent size and rez, too. 05:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Yes. Good image. I support. 06:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm definitely for it. The image gives fans a lot to think about. At least we have something to show us what the next Zelda title is going to look like. Noble Wrot 16:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) Absolutely. I don't think there is any reason for this NOT to be featured. It has great resolution, a nice tease with the mysterious girl, great quality, and overall a very cool picture. This has MY vote! --DekuLink 02:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Steve does have a point, but I think this image is too good to pass up waiting for something possibly better or more complete to appear. After all, it could always be replaced in future if deemed necessary. 17:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) This image is fantastic. Not only is the the image high quality, but it also raises questions. Who is the female/male behind him (note that the hair may look like a female, but I don't see anything on the chest :P)? Where are they going (note the background eerily looks like a cavern entrance that has blown up with fire coming out)? Is this a Twilight Princess Link or an Ocarina of Time Link in Twilight Princess style? What will the game be called (examples: Spirit of Time, Blade of Bane, etc. ...)? Just so many questions that can come from image. Anyways before I rant on... *places vote* 12:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC).
 * 9) You know what? We haven't gotten anywhere with this, nor voted in an image for more than a month, so I'm changing my decision. This is a good image after all, but it's been doing nothing but collecting dust, and I agree with Adam that it can always be superseded. The style is great, it creates alot of controversy for the new game; it is absolutely great. 03:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) Oh man, this image is a must, This is the image causing excitement among the fan community. Art is all about invoking emotion. Who'd deny this picture is doing that? It's an incredible image to see as well. 03:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm not going to vote for this yet. It's a great image, superb size and quality, but judging by the title being simply "The Legend of Zelda" I can tell this isn't the final artwork. If there is, for all we know it will be even more epic than this, so I'm going to hold off just a bit longer and see what happens. Though, judging by this it will be featured within little time. 05:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC) Vote withdrawn by user.

}}