Talk:Dark Rites

Sacred Flames
The differences between the two sets of flames that I put in before were just observations, and I'm not really seeing why they couldn't be put in. I wasn't trying to point out any kind of connection between them (for the record, I think the Dark Rite flames were created to counteract the Sacred Flames and may have played a role in forging Demise's Sword, but I know there's vitually nothing to support this idea, thus making it unfit for the article). And everything I said was true- in SS, Link had to strike three Goddess Crests and light the Sacred Flames to power up the Master Sword, which Zelda then had to bless to bring out its true potential, allowing the sword to be used against Demise; in OoX, Link had to stop the Dark Flames from being lit (which he ultimately failed to do), and Zelda was then kidnapped to be sacrificed to revive Ganon. These facts directly contrast one another, thus making the two sets of flames opposites. This may have been deliberate, or only coincidental, but it ultimately doesn't matter, since, again, I'm not theorizing any kind of connection- just pointing out a quirk of storyline. With this in mind, may I put the trivia back? Setras 03:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not an admin or anything, but the connection just seems really tenuous to me. Yes, that's what the Sacred Flames are, yes, that's what the Dark Rites are. But there's more different between them than similar: the Sacred Flames are already there, just need to be used, while the Dark Rites flames have elaborate rituals behind summoning them; the colors differ; Zelda in the Dark Rites is used only because she is "pure", not necessarily because she is Zelda. The Sacred Flames bear a lot more resemblance, as they are intended to, to the Pendants/Spiritual Stones/Goddess Pearls theme. I personally don't think that being "three multicolored flames" "makes" them opposites, any more than the flames involved in dungeon puzzles or used as bottle items would be. As such, if they're mentioned at all, I feel it should be in a "theories" or "see also" section that makes it clear that any resemblance is not obviously intended.KrytenKoro 14:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)