Zelda Wiki:Failed Nominations/Picture

Failed Picture Nominations
The following sections are picture nominations that received at least three signed opposition votes.

{{hide|header=Great Deku Tree.png (Great Deku Tree) — Failed on February 25, 2011|content=

Great Deku Tree
When I first saw this image, I was just... wow. The detail is stunning, with the light coming through the leaves and and the shading on the Great Deku Tree himself. It captures the intensity of a new adventure, with Link staring timidly into his darkened mouth. I think it truly is feature-worthy. Rambo Zelda 15:39, 29 October 2010 (EST)


 * 1) This image...it's so opaque, but the thing about it that caught my eye is the shadows. They contrast with the rest of the image so well I want to get my controller and make a new file just so I can compare the image to the tree in the game. 09:33, 2 November 2010 (EDT)


 * 1) This image isn't that high of quality. It looks rather pixeled and low quality, something you'd see from a crappy scanner. 21:03, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm going to have to say no here, too. It's way too small and pixelated. It looks like it was scanned out of the Nintendo Power guide, as it's about that size and it's has artifact lines running back and forth on it that look like it's from light leaking into the scanner, like you get when scanning something from a book or magazine. Unless a better version can be found, I don't think this should be featured. 02:07, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep, unfortunately the size and quality are too limited for this to be used. Maybe if an improved version can be found this could be nominated again. 08:02, 25 February 2011 (EST)

Good picture, but please try to find a better, higher-quality version of it for a featured picture. 19:03, November 25, 2010 (UTC) }} {{hide|header=Art from Spirit Tracks (Spirit Tracks art) — Failed on May 6, 2011|content=

Link, Zelda, and the Train
A big image with fantastic quality, also it shows the three main characters of Spirit Tracks. If viewed at full size, you can see that it is perfectly cropped and not messy. It shows that even the train is an important character in the game. This picture has every right to be featured. --Masked Kafei 06:29, 4 May 2011 (EDT)


 * 1) I agree. Even zooming in all the way, the picture is not pixely.  It is very HQ and shows the "characters" of the game.  :3 LegendOfHyrule31 21:00, 5 May 2011 (EDT)


 * 1) While there's nothing particularly wrong with this image, I'm not wowed by it at all. There's no weight to it - it's three rather plain, if accurate, renders in one picture. It needs something more notable to qualify for featured status... something that makes me say to myself, "How have I never seen this amazing picture before?!" 00:53, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) I absolutely agree. There's really nothing that special to me about this picture. If this deserves to be featured, then so does pretty much every other high quality Spirit Tracks artwork we have. There are plenty of amazing, high quality renders around the Wiki. That doesn't mean they all deserve to be featured. 08:15, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 3) While this image is fantastic in the respect that it really showcases some of the characters of Spirit Tracks, however it's rather bland, and there's nothing extraordinary considering we have much more interesting images from Spirit Tracks. 18:16, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

}}

{{hide|header=Mirror of Twilight (back) (Mirror of Twilight) — Failed on July 10, 2011|content=

Mirror of Twilight (Back)
The Mirror of Twilight is a very beautiful work of art yes. Vastly unique. But the back side of the Mirror is just as beautiful and is even more obscure and rarely appreciated. Very few people stop to take a look at the back of the mirror. It is surprisingly intricate and detailed. So I'm choosing to nominate them both at once. This one is for the back of the mirror. Scroll up the page for the front! GO VOTE! 01:51, March 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) The quality here is horrible, and really, who wants to have the back of something as featured? —★ Chip  200  14:57, 11 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) This image looks spectacular in its thumbnail version, however upon viewing full size... not so much. Not only does the resolution seem to be low, but the transparency is choppy and not to mention the black lines are rather obnoxious looking. It's a beautiful image, just not feature quality. 23:04, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Yeah, it's interesting in terms of something to have in the article, but the image doesn't stand on its own merits. The black lines look weird, and the pixels are all quite visible. Also, it's a circular object, but this image isn't even round; it's a regular icosagon! (yes, I had to look the name up) 16:01, 10 July 2011 (EDT)


 * 1) I'd nominate this one because it's just so cool, but my only critique would be that it is a bit blurry at full size. I believe that making this image smaller (maybe around 20% smaller) may fix a large percentage of the blurriness; across the wiki in thumbnail form, this image looks highly awe-inspiring! 09:16, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) Ditto Cip's sentiments. I love how this is one of those things you don't see often but just looks so cool... if the blurriness can be dealt with, it will have my vote. 12:52, 11 May 2011 (EDT)

}}