Community talk:Bloopers

Ok, odd page to have, delete or move to the community namespace. 07:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I think this should just be deleted outright, this is stupid. If we're to keep it, though, definitely move to the community namespace. -- Zesty Cactus  07:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Uh...yeah...let's get this off the main space, please. Dany36 07:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * What Dany said. 13:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, someone actually uploaded a video about this page on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVWXNfU_tX4&feature=related The guy is pretty modest, saying that we should interview him because people need to know more about him. XD Dany36 20:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

lblbates here, yes it's me the youtuber mentioned in this article, I found this article about a year ago while searching my username on youtube and found this fanbased webpage, I was suprised to see my name mentioned in such a article on a site considering nobody had mentioned it to me before, a year ago I made a video that talked about this webpage and noticed how this article said very little of me, you would think people reading this article would like to know more, so I went into account of asking if there were any interviews from the creator of this article and or admins who run this site. The video however was removed, for the simple reason that this is fanbased, anybody can come on here and create an article inlisting me, preferebly one of my subscribers, asking to be questioned was a little over the top considering the creator of this article is unknown or "anonymous" Im not too familiar with this site so I don't know exactly how it works, I didn't a year ago and I still don't considering it is rare that i visit this site, the discussion on this article is rather negative, It's entertainment people, a few of you people are saying this shouldn't belong on the main page, why not? It is zelda related and yes it is "bloopers" and just voice overs of the actually game, yet if this isn't what your interested in I don't see why you would click on this article let along comment on it, Im not sure who made this article and it is somewhat out of date considering nintendodarknesslink and masterlinkx do not create such bloopers anymore, however this article should still remain to look back at a time when masterlinkx and nintendodarknesslink did indeed make zelda bloopers,it was a fun time and i enjoyed creating bloopers along with watching there bloopers aswell, after all there the ones who got me started

Lblbates 01:34, 21 February 2011 (EST)

Back to Article Deletion
Perhaps this article should have been deleted a long time ago. Not only is an article like this unrealistic to keep up (there are literally thousands, and perhaps more, YouTubers and other internet video-ers that partake in Zelda-related "blooper" videos), but it represents a few users with an extreme bias, as if these users are the only ones on the net to partake in this activity. Right off the top of my head, I can already think of many Zelda "blooper" makers, including game reviewers like AVGN, the Nostalgia Critic, Irate Gamer, and even small mini-series exist like "Four Swords MisAdventures" and the Haunted Majora's Mask Cartridge Hoax, etc that all have significant notoriety, yet are not on this page. Let's figure out what to do with this page! 01:53, 21 February 2011 (EST) EDIT: Perhaps we should also refrain from ""hiding" pages in the Community namespace. While it may be a bit harder to access, it is still on the wiki and viewable. Let's just either purge or keep, and if we keep, let's make sure to fortify and legitimize these articles so that they are worth keeping, in the mainspace or elsewhere! 01:56, 21 February 2011 (EST)


 * I'm going to say "delete". I mean, unless someone actually wants to make something worthwhile out of this page, putting it out of its misery would probably be best. :P 06:59, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Reviving dead convo...delete this page? I don't see this going anywhere, so I think we should just hit it with a nuke and be done with it. 17:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, for reasons already stated. 18:01, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Let's delete it. Short, an I really can't see it being expanded soon. We don't really need to add the info on the series related to this, though... they have their own pages. 18:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)