User talk:Adam660@legacy41957735


 * Archive, 2007
 * Archive, 2008 Q1
 * Archive, 2008 Q2
 * Archive, 2008 Q3-4
 * Archive, 2009 Q1-2
 * Archive, 2009 Q3-4

Uhm..
We wonder if you died.. :'( 03:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, dude. We haven't seen you for weeks. :/ 04:48, January 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Pah, sorry to disappoint, but the rumours of my demise have been greatly exaggerated ;) Although I suppose a 10 day absence might as well be forever in our crazy world of wiki ;p
 * P.S. Happy 2010 to all who read this! 08:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * He lives! Glad to have you back, man. 09:01, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Quite the opposite of disappointment! We worried about you dude. 09:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, quite worried >:( But, glad you haven't...y'know...kicked the bucket. 22:18, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Newbie Question
Is it okay to ask for game pointers or would that be off-topic? ZoraKnight 15:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

WiKirby
Seeing how Axi is away for awhile, I'll have to direct this to you. It seems that Austin's encountering the same problem that Brent had with WiKirby: It refuses to allow him connect. I believe it's the same thing where it can't process his request as before, so I would suggest raising another support ticket with bluehost about it. Talk to Austin for more specific details about the problem, though. Hopefully, this won't become a recurring thing :/ 20:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Question about Monaco.css
Hey, I was wondering if you'd be able to tell me how to edit the Monaco.css so that when someone edits a page, it makes a like how it's done here. Is this something I'd be able to do or is that something Wikia is in control of? Jo the Marten ( Shriek )  ಠ_ಠ  16:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Um, I'm not quite sure I understand what you're asking about; did you mean the "Currently editing" bar that shows up when you edit a page? 08:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * No, like here and how the deleted words are crossed out. Jo the Marten  ( Shriek )  ಠ_ಠ  01:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah, now I see what you mean. That's done using a file called diff.css (ZW's copy is found here ). It's not editable via the wiki's interface (and of course viewing the file in a browser is read-only), so to customise ours I had to manually edit the file on our server. I'm guessing that only Wikia staff will have that level of access, and I'm not sure what their policy on interface customisation is, so you might have a hard time getting them to change it. I guess that's just one of the many benefits that comes with independance... 12:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Aye. :/ This is rather unfortunate. I had a member come up to me saying he was color blind and couldn't see the edits. Guess I'll have to bring it up with Wikia then. Thanks for your help! Jo the Marten  ( Shriek )  ಠ_ಠ  22:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk Page
In my experience, talk pages belong to the users, not the administrators. In past, they have been allowed to remove garbage they don't want on their pages, just as Mandi has in the past as well. She edits and locks her page simply so she doesn't have to converse with certain people, and I'm sure there's been others. My talk page is my talk page, and I have every right to de-garbage it if I wish. And by the way, your "final warning" means nothing to me until you issue the same ruling to Nerushi. You all wanted to block me alongside that clown AuronKaizer before simply for defending all of you from him (which I was stabbed in the back for), yet you just want to slap Nerushi on the wrist and show bias toward me. So until your rulings become impartial and equivalent, your "final warning" isn't worth the energy you took to type it to me. Link87 20:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice one by the way, you lock MY page when I didn't even remove your pointless comments. Tut Tut. I demand that it be unlocked now however, thank you very much. If not, I shall be writing to Jason about this overstepping of bounds and abuse of power. Link87 20:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Forgot to say "thanks"
I saw the addition of the skipcaptcha to the patrol and autopatrol groups. I much appreciate that, because it was getting really annoying :P 19:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Editing my user page
I know that I had used userbox templates that didn't exist. I was planning on creating them sometime when I'm feeling a little less lazy, lol. I just wanted to put them there so I would remember to make them, and I'd only have to click on the links to start editing them. You didn't have to delete them from my page. Tyeforce 08:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi there. It wasn't done with malicious intent, just part of an ongoing process of cleaning up links to stuff that doesn't exist. You see, this list was once over 1000 pages long, and once it gets to zero, we're done and the wiki is finished and we can all go home and drink beer XD
 * Remember kids; every time you create a red link, a fairy dies :,( 18:40, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I didn't know that, sorry. Well, I'll make them exist so there's no problem then, lol. Tyeforce 02:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

I hope you're online. O_O
Our Vandal is back. I don't suppose you're online to block him or something...? =\ 19:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Just a request
Pleeeease, Can you delete my account? I wanted to improve some minor things, but now I don't like that everyone can put anything they want. And try to end the games you start.--Taligo 11:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not quite sure what you're asking here, or what you mean by "putting anything they want" or "ending games"? Maybe you should take a look at this which details the options about deactivating accounts; but remember, the easiest way is to simply not log into your account any more! 11:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the C-nintendo Template
You discontinued the use of Template: C-nintendo last August, but did not recommend its removal from the image pages. Is there is a technical reason for this or were you planning on doing something with it? Regardless, I plan on fixing the summaries and descriptions of many images and this little template pops up often. Can I omit it? 03:40, 26 August 2010 (EDT)


 * I was never aware of any future reasons he might have for it. To me it seems like he only said that so he could eventually figure out how to get his bot to remove all of them. 17:22, August 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, pretty much that. To quote myself:

"It is still present on a number of images, but will display nothing. While it may be removed from images, doing so is not recommended unless there is another actual need to edit the image in question."

- Adam; 08:33, 22 August 2009


 * What I meant by that was that it can and should be removed, but because it has no visible effect, doing so is not a valuable or productive thing to do in itself. Although if you happen to be editing an image page for another reason and see one, feel free to remove it. However, when I check here, it seems that it's now transcluded onto only three images. So I'll clean up the remaining usage and delete it ;) 13:31, 26 August 2010 (EDT)


 * No, it's not translcluded in many pages, but it appears very often in older comments, which is what I'm going to try to work with soon. Thank you for clearing things up. ^_^ 14:01, 26 August 2010 (EDT)

Another thing we need to do
Hey, Adam. I found out why the throttle for the edit filter was failing, and it requires us to install memcached. We keep missing each other, so I figured I'd just leave a talk page message. Also, I tried to install it on Lylat Wiki but it caused all sorts of problems. I submitted a ticket and they replied with "Sorry, but you can't install memcached on shared hosting." I had someone ask Jason for me, and it turns out that ZW is not on shared hosting, thankfully. So if you want to try to get to it without me, feel free. I can't really be of much help, anyway, since I can't install it. But yeah, install that and the filter should be good to go. You'll also have to run it from the command line. This can be of service, I think. Well, good luck! 12:24, 6 September 2010 (EDT)
 * Oh, one thing I found out is that there's no security for memcached. I'd say to follow their precautions and make the ports it uses not publicly available, and to make sure that the server is firewalled. I'd love to get the throttle going, but not if it puts the site at risk, y'know? 14:14, 6 September 2010 (EDT)
 * Hmmm, well I tried running a small (64MB) instance of memcached on an unused firewalled port. I could see it being used by the wiki, but it caused session errors with login and editing ("Login error. There seems to be a problem with your login session; this action has been canceled as a precaution against session hijacking. Go back to the previous page, reload that page and then try again.", "Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data. Please try again. If it still does not work, try logging out and logging back in."). I'll have to try again later, tweaking some settings (perhaps it's due to setting $wgSessionsInMemcached). Also, where did you come across the suggestion that memcached was required for this to work? 17:12, 6 September 2010 (EDT)
 * It was in the Mediawiki IRC room (#mediawiki). I asked if throttle was SUPPOSED to be broken, and the reply was that you needed memcached to have it work. Those guys know their stuff, and I've gotten some good help from them before. It's actually a really great way to get help, so if you have an IRC client, add #mediawiki to your list of channels. The host is irc.freenode.net. Anyways, I'll ask about that problem and see if I can get answers. 21:03, 6 September 2010 (EDT)
 * By the way, try setting $wgSessionsInMemcached to false. That may help. It says it's optional, anyway. 21:51, 6 September 2010 (EDT)
 * OK, I've set $wgSessionsInMemcached to false, and it seemed OK (but quite slow). I'll tinker about with memory allocation and see how it goes. 07:24, 7 September 2010 (EDT)

Sounds good. Let me know if you get it working. 09:06, 7 September 2010 (EDT) By the way, I just tested it out on my WAMP wiki and it worked. So yeah, this is definitely a requirement for the filter throttle. 13:30, 7 September 2010 (EDT)
 * OK, I allocated 256 MB to memcached and it seems to be running fine for now; don't want to go much higher than that, or it might eat up all the free physical memory and start using the swapfile, which would probably make things run much slower. Time to wait and see if the filter kicks in (and keep an eye out for any performance issues). 13:45, 7 September 2010 (EDT)
 * Mmkay. Do you want to do some testing on the throttle, though? I encountered an error in the source of mine (nothing major, just an "undefined variable" error that was annoying.) Might be a good idea to test it out and then fix it if necessary (since all the fix takes is just muting errors on that variable with @.) 13:49, 7 September 2010 (EDT)