Template talk:Names

Template change?
Was there any particular reason for this, exactly? It seems very complicated compared to the old style and I didn't see anything wrong with the previous template. What's the reasoning behind the change? Also, I can see some of the bigger templates becoming very messy under this style... 17:33, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm assuming by bigger templates you mean these. We're not even using a template for that at the moment, it's just raw wikicode. They're going to be messy either way, but a template would at least make them a bit more... manageable.


 * I couldn't tell you for sure what drove Abdullah to make the change, but I can think of one reason: having the meaning separate as opposed to using Exp makes information more easily accessible to readers. Almost a quarter of our users are on mobile phones, and Exp is not functional on any phone that doesn't allow you to "hover" a cursor over text (e.g. the iPhone).


 * That said, the "meaning" parameter could be made optional. Then the new version would be as simple as the old one in its most basic form. Really, we should only bother with the "meaning" when the name translates to English as something different than the NoA name. 20:48, 16 December 2012 (UTC)