User talk:Darre

Hello
-- TheStoneWatcher (talk) 17:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Queen Zelda
The Princess Zelda page is only for canon appearances, please use the Princess Zelda/Other Appearances page to add anything that is non-canon, in this case. The Hyrule Warriors section is just a stub, so all the info you got is more than welcome there. Chuck (talk) 19:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Mr. Aonuma has confirmed that Hyrule Warriors isn't canon. Please stop replacing the non-canon templates with ambiguously canon templates for Hyrule Warriors-related subjects on pages. Nintendocan (talk) 00:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * He stated it was its own canonical dimension that pulled from the high canon so it is canonical in that anything there was pulled in from the main Zelda games, so characters like Agitha and Midna are taken from the regular canon from different points in time through the timespace portal rather than that universe's version of the character, as he had said in different forms since announcement.
 * If your theory is accurate, then that could be said the same about all other non-canon games in the series. But are they labeled as ambiguously canon? Also, he did say it was like its own separate dimension, but he never said it was canonical. Nintendocan (talk) 04:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thats why I put Ambiguously Canon he said it wasn't apart of the main canon but never stated it to be confirmed to be canon like Link's Crossbow Training which is Ambiguously Canon


 * Due to a recent interview with Aonuma, Zelda Wiki does not consider Hyrule Warriors to be canon or ambiguously canon. Also, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ). 01:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)