Talk:Midna

Theories About Midna
Deleted that entire section. It was awful and seemed to reflect on the author's beliefs and opinions more than that of the general public. Using statements such as "hopefully not" and "predictable" is inappropriate, and claiming certain objects look like breasts and that Majora's voice is "girly" is equally inappropriate. I can rewrite it, if nobody else wants to. ~vox

Who likes Midna better, her first form or her real form?


 * Personally, I liked her first form. But I have a tendancy to like the weird looking characters. For example, Medli was my favorite character in The Wind Waker. Anyways, onto my real point, which will be stated below...

I like her in her real form, she looks pretty. Her makeup looks similar to the Japanese Makeup used in Kabuki.

I like the Imp form better.--4.153.26.129 19:46, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

Happy Midna?
What the heck is with that weird, bright, and happy Midna picture? o_O Is that official art? It's way to cheery to really capture Midna, I think. --Jase 15:47, 19 January 2007 (CST)

I found a nice pic of midna and put the old on in a gallery similar to the ones I made for link Zelda and Ganon.71.183.44.244 17:05, 9 February 2007 (CST)

Midna's voice isn't girly. And some of the info given a while ago was completely wrong until somebody changed it. Whoever write that was expressing their opinion, not everyone on the whole.

She looks cool in both her forms by the way! She's got to be my fave character. :)

I have an image of Midna that seams to be a cross between her two forms. She looks like a princess the height of an imp, with long, curly brown hair. She has clothes similar to Full form Midna's but she has nothing covering her hair. She also has a tattoo on her right cheek resembling the Kokiri symbol, and had a Kokiri-like green headband. Her clothes, rather than black, look like a very dark shade of green or teal.--Claire 11:38, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Princess Midna
Okay, so I'm fine with this article being called either Midna or Princess Midna, but I kinda want to make something clear for myself (have been wanting to do that for a while now).
 * Personally, I believe that if someone puts his hand, voluntarily and knowingly, in liquid oxygen, fire, a hungry tiger's mouth, acid, or a shredder (turned on), that person is simply stupid. I do not believe they can complain anywhere that there was no sign or person telling them they'd lose their hand if they'd do that.
 * That said, why do we have spoiler warnings and the like? If somewhere is written "story" or "synopsis" and I read it, it's my own stupid fault that I spoil the story for myself. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia about the Zelda Universe, right? (correct me if I'm wrong. I couldn't find a "What this is and what this not is" page). Just who would come here, looking for an article or articles that he/she knows are very likely to spoil something for them? Just WHAT would such a person expect to find? When I had not played TP yet, I stayed away from the TP boards. It's common sense.
 * So, just as a question, why do we put warning signs everywhere? Wouldn't it in general be handier to put one big warning sign on the front page, rather than many scattered all over the site in articles that are bound to spoil it for you if you read them while not having played/finished the game yet. Midna, Princess Midna; I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. Just for the sake of a true encyclopedic article, I don't think anyone should worry about that very small group of idiots that do not know the meaning of "encyclopedia". IfIHaveTo 14:50, 18 November 2007 (EST)


 * I take your point; most of what is written on the wiki is a spoiler of one type or another. Therefore, I think the template should be used sparingly, only for major spoilers (by which I mean those which entirely spoil either the game's ending, or it's major plot twist/reveal). But I do think it's essential that we still have them. I have played 11 Zelda titles, of which I have completed 8, so for me there is little left to spoil. But I expect that's not true of many readers here. And you have to bear in mind that the wiki is a hugely varied mix of articles, some of which relate to one game, others to many, a large proportion of which do not specify which game the pertain to. So the risk of running across a major spoiler for a game you may wish to play un-spoiled is high. In my view, anything we can do to lessen that makes this a more agreeable place to be, and I don't find that the warnings impair my enjoyment of an article. (NB, just my opinion, not necessarily right :) --Adam 15:58, 18 November 2007 (EST)