Talk:Linebeck II

Does anyone else find it a little strange that we have a page for a character that is never mentioned as far as i can remember? Ocarina of Time 02:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd have to agree. I say we delete it? 02:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thats what i would say. this is just strange. Ocarina of Time 02:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I had to think on this for a minute. The character is mentioned in . His letter is given to Link. Since he's mentioned, I don't see a reason to delete it. 04:32, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is he? I thought the letter came from Linebeck III's grandfather, AKA Linebeck? 04:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The letter is from Linebeck III's grandfather, and here's the quote that proves it:
 * I say keep this article; there is enough to prove his existence even if he doesn't appear in the games (i.e. name continuity, Linebeck III's existence, etc.)
 * By that logic we should make articles for everyone's parents. Yeah, I say delete. 05:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I guess. Do away with it, then. 07:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What Triforce said. Vote: delete. 11:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, we have this article. Using this logic, we need to delete that too. Linebeck II is mentioned, this article doesn't need to be deleted. 21:19, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, Linebeck II is not mentioned in the story, only implied. The only ones mentioned in Spirit Tracks are Linebeck (the one who wrote the letter) and Linebeck III. Link's Mother on the other hand is explicitly referenced in Ocarina of Time, by the Deku Tree Sprout. 21:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hmm...I was understanding that it was Linebeck II that wrote the letter, so that's why I was intent on keeping it... :P . 21:48, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nope, Linebeck wrote it. Ocarina of Time 03:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


 * 'Kay, then my vote is delete. If no one opposes in a few hours I'll delete it. 04:08, January 20, 2010 (UTC)