Help talk:Featured Content

Nice page, I suppose we can all, (every ZW editor) can debate the finer points of the policy here. I was thinking to get some thoughts on time limits for nominees. So that for instance, something doesn't rot on the page all year long while additions to the bottom of the page become featured. I still think some images will come and technically have nothing wrong with them, but still aren't worth the honor. (no disrepect intended). I don't see this as being like voting for a president, more like nominating something to a Hall of Fame or such. For example, your yearbook picture may have nothing wrong with it, but it's not getting hung in a museum either. Same basic principles. 06:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Definitely worth considering; there has to be some kind of reasonable time limit imposed (perhaps around 6 months?) Otherwise, much like before the introduction of opposition voting, we risk "run of the mill" content creeping in as featured by default, only this time because people are sick of seeing it clogging up the place (and know that an opposition vote would be removed, whereas a support vote wouldn't...) 16:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)