Category talk:Reservoirs

I say we just delete Category:Bodies of water and be done with it. This one serves the purpose of bodies of water well, but I don't want to do any deleting until it's been discussed. 19:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Lol, just read a bit and see there's no page to delete, just to talk about. So I say we don't move it, though if we are, let's just do it so the nasty red text is gone.  19:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * All we need to do to get rid of the redlink is decide whether or not the page should be moved and then remove the template.... I support the move, since the term "reservoir" does not encompass each one of these articles. Jimbo Jambo 20:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * At a push, maybe about one third of the articles here could be described as a "reservoir". As such, this category name is inadequate, and in my view should either be replaced with a new category "Bodies of Water", or removed entirely. 20:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, then, should it just be done with? 01:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)