Talk:Tree

Delete
Seriously... tree... such a random item. Sure articles for notable trees, okay. But I don't think this... it will lead to grass, air, sky, hill and encourage pointless articles. 07:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, trees are actually interactable objects, so I don't really know what to say. Then again, if we don't have an article for grass, then... --Never mind, we do! So yeah, if it were any other game, I wouldn't see the point of this article either, but some trees in Zelda contain items, and others can be cut down, so I guess I would say trees deserve their own article just as much as signs do. Jimbo Jambo 07:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * It won't be deleted, I asked about this on an article for a light beam and some other really mundane 'objects'. Adam or Ando, maybe both told me it was here to stay, so we might as well make it something worth reading, right? 03:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Really minor things like this can go here: Zelda Definitions. 04:09, February 2, 2009 (UTC)


 * Trees and grass are definitely more deserving of articles than light beams, but I don't want to see this discussion close just because a similar one was had a while ago. Jimbo Jambo 07:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, looks luike this never reached a conclusion. It needs to be either suggested for merge with Zelda Definitions, or un-flagged for deletion. If nobody else has any views on this, I'll do the latter shortly. 12:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I think the actual material should be in the definitions. However, I think perhaps it should just be a disambiguation page. Linking to either the Maku Tree or the Deku Tree. Then another link that will send the user to the definitions page. Mases 16:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)