Talk:Jukebox

Delete
Okay, so this page is up for deletion. I think the argument that it should be deleted because the info is already in the Nintendo Land page is rather void, since the information was added there after this page was made, but it still has information from that page and the Technology page nonetheless. Though, I don't think that should inhibit this page's existence. We could simply add the Main template to those pages and add brief descriptions about the respective appearances where relevant. 00:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not so sure. I doubt that this article will ever have that much information, and it seems that there's not much to say about it that can't just be mentioned on the other two pages. I hardly feel that this page is notable or relevant; it deals with an item in a non-canon game, as well as an aesthetic object that has only appeared once. If we were to keep this page, I think that we should prioritise its appearance in Nintendo Land, seeing as it's much more notable than its appearance in Ocarina of Time. We could focus on the Nintendo Land appearance, and then briefly mention the Ocarina of Time appearance in the Trivia section. However, I think that we should just delete the page. 10:05, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I was the one who added the info to the Nintendo Land page and added the delete template; and I did it mainly because the page was originally this long. Even though there's way more info on this page now, it seems useless because the info on the Ocarina of Time section is copy-pasted from the Technology page, and now the Nintendo Land page has the exact same info that this page has. There might be smaller stubs on this wiki, but at least most of those have the potential for expansion... 13:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)


 * For my third edit of this nature in a row... What shall we do with this page? Delete, keep, or redirect? I'm down for deletion, given the total lack of anything worthwhile in this article. No offense to the page authors, but I can't see this getting any bigger, and it barely has any notoriety at all. It isn't even menioned. 17:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)