User talk:TriforceTony

File Names
There is another The Cutting Floor floor image, I want to add. Its the Master Craftsman's Son unused mohawk in Ocarina Of Time,. What should I call the file? Delsait (talk) 01:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I think  might work. Also you probably saw, but unused content should be hosted on the Unused Content page for now, rather than on individual subject pages. (It's just where we keep the information, but we might be revising how we approach that soon.) TriforceTony (talk) 01:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * That sounds good. Can I mention that the Medicine Shop Owner's unused model in the notes section, similar to how we mention Sword Beam being in early builds for OOT in the notes section? An image wouldn't be attached to the note. Delsait (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * That seems to be an oversight, but I don't think a trivia snippet that also links to the unused content page would be outrageous. TriforceTony (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

The Legend of Zelda An original version
‟The Legend of Zelda„ An Original Version

I saw that you created this page in Aug 2019 and it really intrigued me today. How did you find out about this book? I can barely find any references to it anywhere. Pinkrupee (talk) 07:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Kafei recurring
Can you please elaborate where he recurs? Tastymeatball (talk) 19:22, 1 July 2021 (UTC)


 * and are games that are an extension of  where MM3D: appears.  is a separate entry from, and though this isn't a game, it qualifies. TriforceTony (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Discussion page
Now that gamepedia is owned by Fandom, is it possible we could start a disscusion page for the wiki? BaltoKirigaya (talk)

How's it going? (Also Termina, l.o.l.)
I just wanted to thank you for responding to the Termina thread. :) I appreciate your perspective about this topic very much, especially with your experience making edits upon the wiki. Through our discussion, and reading the other posts about the topic on the talk page, it seems to me that this has become a complex question of canon and priority of canon. Both Hyrule Historia and The Legend of Zelda: Encyclopedia are the closest we have to authorities as far as the evolving understanding of the time-line is concerned, but to what degree are they authoritative in other areas, especially if they present themselves as mere "interpreters of legends"? Does that mean they don't take themselves too seriously? Is the canon of individual games greater or lesser with regard to interpreting their own events in case of an apparent conflict? If sources contradict, can their perspectives co-exist as interpretations of the "truth" of a given legend? How much are we willing to rely upon any one non-game source when discerning the "truth"? I suppose this could be seen as a good test case about how to deal with similar issues that shall not doubt crop up for the wiki in future. Anyway, I hope you are doing well! - Webspidrman (talk) 22:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)