User talk:Abdullah5599@legacy41961806

Testing
Testing sig. -- 12:28, 23 May 2011 (EDT)
 * IT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRKKKKSSSSSSS!!!!!! THANKS SO MUCH!!! =D -- 12:29, 23 May 2011 (EDT)

Hi again.
I just had some questions regarding some earlier edits that I did and you seemed to have corrected.

1. In the page Rock Sirloin, I removed an image and I put a message there which I guess I shouldn't have, but I just wanted to know why you did what you did. You see, I'm still getting used to some of the ways this wiki works.

2. In the page River Zora, I did some edits, a few of which seems to not have been good since you re-edited them. So I was just wondering what is wrong with adding a caption for the half-submerged river Zora sprite. Moreover, since the picture is from ALTTP, I thought it should belong to its section in the article, and seeing as it was relocated back there, I was also wondering the reason.

3. Just after I finished my recent edit there did I notice that you added this ->

, right before the section for Link's Awakening in the same article. I was wondering why that is necessary.

4. In the sentence "They still have their well-known spitting attack, but now they additionally attack with a sword as well and block Link's attacks with a shield.", is the addition of the words "they additionally" grammatically incorrect? Just wondering.

Hoping you'll answer these questions, because they would help me to make better contributions here. 07:23, 1 July 2011 (EDT)


 * 1. On ZW, we don't usually remove anything from talk pages unless it really disturbs the page, like huge images or vulgar comments. Instead, we make images more appropriately sized and strike out outdated data. It's still there for users to explore, so if they have similar problems, they might be able to find the solution more easily. Besides, "Image removed" makes me really curious to find out what was originally posted :P


 * 2. Well, the caption was pretty redundant. I'm on the Zora page, some of the images already show half-submerged Zoras, and I was in the ALTTP section. It didn't really add anything new. Also, the caption took a bit of space, and only one other image had a caption (which actually needed it), so it felt out of place. (See your edit again)


 * 3. I'm viewing the site on a widescreen, so the picture of King Zora was going into the Link's Awakening section. The Clear template makes it so that any images don't go past it. It's nothing major, but it helps make the site more readable for people with different screen resolutions.


 * 4. The word "additionally" has the same meaning as "as well". If I said "However, the game did not meet everyone's standards, though", you would probably feel odd reading it. Eliminating either "however" or "though" reduces redundancy and makes the sentence sound more natural.


 * If you feel my reasoning is bad or have any question, feel free to ask. I'm only human. Good luck improving the wiki. I can see you've got a ton of determination. 08:32, 1 July 2011 (EDT)


 * 1. With such a policy that ZW has, can I still delete images like the one in that talk page which has lost activity, and the picture has no use elsewhere, as long as I do it like you did, with the filename striked out?


 * 2. You're right. A lot of them are already half-submerged. But then again, I didn't exactly add that comment. I just changed the template around until that hidden part became visible. On that note, I have made some edits to that page again. Maybe you should ensure it's alright.


 * 3. Having a 4:3 ratio monitor, I had no idea such problems are even occuring for others. Thanks for letting me know.


 * 4. You are correct. Even I think I was wrong. Maybe I was feeling drowsy that time. It didn't seem right that time for some reason. 09:36, 1 July 2011 (EDT)


 * 1. Of course. If it has no practical use on the wiki, then tag it for deletion.
 * 2. Yeah, I realize it's not your fault. I just reviewed them and they look great. Keep it up!
 * Just one last thing. When you work on the summaries for the files, could you please add some links? It makes it alot easier to access relevant information. 17:29, 1 July 2011 (EDT)


 * Sorry it took me a while to reply. The wiki has been running haywire for me for a while.
 * I'll try doing what you said, though most of the times, they already have the appropriate link right below them on the list of pages in which the file is being used. 11:37, 7 July 2011 (EDT)