User talk:Darth Nightmaricus

Hello
-- TheStoneWatcher (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Cremia and Madame Aroma
Hey there. I noticed you've been adding information that in the demo for Majora's Mask, Cremia and Madame Aroma are related. There's a few problems, however: However, it's still interesting and usable information on the wiki, we just need to have a source properly cited for this information. Could you provide that, please? 21:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Demos are non-canon and cannot be presented in the same way as canon information. And...
 * 2) In part of the story of the love dynamic between Anju and Kafei, it's repeatedly mentioned that Kafei probably "ran off" to be with Cremia. Since the demo would technically make them cousins and that sends a squicky message overall.


 * I got it from The Cutting Room Floor. Most likely, considering how ignorant Anju's Mother acts already, she is unaware of Madame Aroma and Cremia's relationship, and simply hates Kafei and using Cremia as an excuse. --Darth Nightmaricus (talk) 21:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Ah I see. Took me a little while but I found what you were talking about.
 * The revised text seems a lot colder of a response than the prototype's. Thanks for bringing this to attention. :) 21:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem. --Darth Nightmaricus (talk) 21:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Regarding your editing goals
Hey there. I just wanted to point out some things regarding your editing goals that you should keep in mind. The main thing is that since we're a collaborative wiki, it is generally better to bring up new ideas and proposals before actually starting on them. For instance, the goal on splitting the Great Fairies. I would highly recommend that you bring this up in the talk page first, as any sudden changes made without agreement from the wiki may find itself changed back. I'm sure some of the Great Fairies do warrant a split and their own page, but certainly not all of them.

Second, regarding the image replacements. It's fine and really great and helpful if you can get images of the character models and areas from MM3D, but we would not replace the older images we have of them. We'd like to keep images from both MM and MM3D, and they should be separate. Instead of replacing as new revisions, simply upload them as new images and add them to the pages. That's about it. Thanks. 22:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Regarding the images, you did right at uploading them as a separate file, however, make sure to name them correctly. For example, instead of, use  . Also, please don't add any extra information when uploading a file, such as the image needing cropping. Instead, you can just add the image to the Image Requests page. Finally, when adding the images to their respective pages, don't just replace the old ones, instead, add them to their image gallery on the same page. As The Goron Moron said, "We'd like to keep images from both MM and MM3D."  23:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * The Swordsswordsman thing was a typo, I have no clue how I ended up typing that, but it happened. --I'm just a plain ol' Goron...Darth Nightmaricus (talk) 23:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Fish redirects
Hey. I understand that you worked really hard on those pages, and while it was appreciated, we decided that it was ultimately better that the fish species just share a single page as opposed to each one having an individual page. They don't have much that can be written about them other than what little the games provide, and so for that reason it's just better that they share a page. Again I know you worked hard on those pages, but please understand. Separate fish pages were never a planned thing, and they are not very necessary. 02:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hey, Darth, I feel like there was a lack of communication here that led to some unfortunate results. I don't actually recall informing you, but there was a plan set to keep the fish all on one page before you ever made those articles. I'm sorry that the work you've put into making it a page, but if you would like to discuss how it would truly benefit as a separate article, I'm open to that. However, at this point, I don't see how a separate article will really help it, since all the information on the article can be included in the list as it is.
 * In any case, I apologize for the lack of communication here. 20:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)