Zelda Wiki:Failed Nominations/Picture

Failed Picture Nominations
The following sections are picture nominations which either expired or received a score of -3.

{{hide|header=PhantomHourglassscene13.png (Bellumbeck) — Failed on April 18, 2009 This picture is from the ending sequence of Phantom Hourglass. I think it's style is pretty neat.--Link hero of light 16:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * content=

{{support}} {{oppose}} {{neutral}} Size is reason enough to not vote for it, but hardly justifiable to Oppose an image. The Images above are all great but Opposition votes with the reason of "We already have several very similar images featured." would fit in the rules as stated above. Just bear that in mind before Failing this image. {{:User:Axiomist1875/sig}} 04:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) This is a great picture showcasing the artstyle of Phantom Hourglass's cutscenes. I major Yes. -ATRUEZELDAFAN 13:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) PH has no featured pictures yet, this is worthy on it it's own, it reflects the action and style of the game very nicely. Much more than being a nice image, it's the perfect example of what can be expected from Ph's innocent appearance and fearsome phantoms. {{:User:Axiomist1875/sig}} 06:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) An awesome picture, very stylish and cool looking. Also, a nice action scene. Axle the Beast 04:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) I love this style and tried to do something like that, too. And therefore I can say that this picture is one of the best from the cutscences and not as simple, as it may seem. And also, if PH doesn't have any featured pictures yet, this is another point for it. --Nelde 18:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) This is a really good picture from what is perhaps one of the best portable games ever. It shows all the dynamic emotion and styles that were used in the game, as well as how the boss is fought, in a sort of vauge way.--Petman1325 20:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) The Phantom Hourglass cut out style is so unique!Corey Lord of Tacos! 02:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) This image is incredibly small. It is much smaller than most of our currently featured images. Plus it is one image out of many that are very similar to it. Doesn't really strike me as awesome. Not compared to what we have.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 21:47, April 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I agree with Matt. Although Bellumbeck is awesome, this cutout doesn't stand out from the others in my opinion and doesn't really seem like much compared to other nominees. Kind of droll really. Then there's the size. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Bellumbeck would have made a good featured picture however, this image is incredibly small. Hardly eye catching or even interesting. Not really feature worthy.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 02:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

I as well, will not oppose this image, we have had Phantom Hourglass nominations before. I'd hate to see this one fail because of my vote, but it's certainly not featured material. First of all, Link hero of light, when Matt and Mel told you the image is too small, they meant the image itself; increasing the thumbnail size will do no good. Also by "large", they mean LARGE at least 900px in height, and size of an image does matter (large images give the "wow factor"). Even in the guidelines it states "it's too low resolution" as one of the examples as a justifiable opposition.{{:User:Steven/sig}} 20:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

{{clear}} }}

{{hide|header=Epona w link.png (Link with Epona) — Failed on October 1, 2009|content= This is a very cool image that needs to be featured. There are not very many Epona pictures but I think this one is the best. It really captures the image of Ocarina of Time. It is very nicely drawn and old school. It needs to be featured.--Lt. Hammerspace 03:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC) {{support}}

{{oppose}}
 * 1) Eh...my first and real gripe with this image is the quality. It seems choppy and the transparency job is rather poor. It's also rather uninteresting.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 04:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) The transparency job is done badly, but the image also offers nothing special. It is rather stock-standard, not encapsulating any mood or interest. It doesn't draw people in. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) There are several visible leftovers from a quick and somewhat sloppy transparency job. The tail seems a little choppy and it looks like the sword is missing a few pixels. The tail and mane also look like parts are missing as well as having some background left over. As far as I'm concerned this isn't the highest of quality.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 04:32, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

{{negated}}
 * 1) I absolutely love it. Great image. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 05:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC) Vote withdrawn. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 18:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

{{neutral}}
 * 1) Clean it up, and then we'll talk. Also, doesn't Link know it's dangerous to lean back on a horse while it's rearing? Noble Wrot 05:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

}}
 * 1) The image doesn't look that great now that I know what it is. It's not bad, but not featured quality. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 18:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

{{hide|header=Link and Ezlo Still Life.png (Link and Ezlo Still Life) — Failed on May 10, 2010|content= Boy do we love {{TMC}} here at ZW! This image brilliantly captures the relationship between Link and Ezlo, reminiscent of Link and Navi from Ocarina of Time - Ezlo always tries to provide Link advice and "get through to Link's head", literally! With it's expertly done transparency, cartoony, yet vivid contrast, and nice size, this image is definitely overqualified for the Featured Pictures category! {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 21:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

{{Support}} I like it. :) Very defining, and an somewhat unfamiliar piece of work. +1 {{:User:Alter/sig}} 22:39, April 25, 2010 (UTC) {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}} }}
 * Wow, my b. I did not realize that this image was one in a series of similar images, all depicting Ezlo and Link in a similar manner. :( {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 21:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) I vote against for the same reason as Cip, here. It's one of a series of similar images. Nothing unique about it.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 03:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Yeah, sorry Cip! It's a funny image but you make a good point. :P Dany36 03:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

{{hide|header=ST Link Phantom Zelda Spirit Train Artwork.png (Spirit Tracks Artwork) — Failed on July 28, 2010|content= This image is interesting and has great quality. Definitely sums up the awesomeness of Spirit Tracks.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 07:17, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

{{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}} }}
 * 1) Well I think it's a good image, despite what Alter said. It has much more positive things to be a Featured Image instead of that one fault. It has nice colors and perspective. It shows fierceness in Link... Etc. {{:User:Yusei/sig}} 23:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose per opposition guideline part "E". Several variations of the images make for an unimpressive Featured Image. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 18:18, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I have to agree with Alter. It's not terribly unique, really. It's the same sort of thing we've seen in the artworks from PH and TMC, which make for a generally bland feel. We've got much better ST images than just this, so why settle? :P{{:User:Justin/sig}} 21:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) I agree as well. The image is generic, rather uninteresting, and really no different than the hundreds of other, similar images of Link, the Phantom, and the Spirit Train. 1337star 21:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

{{hide|header=LinkImpa.png (Link and Impa) — Failed on September 13, 2010|content= I'm not sure what it is that caused me to look at this picture and think "Oh, boy! I think I'll nominate this for a Featured Image!". For some reason, it just struck as interesting, in a good sort of way. I love the image as a whole; it feels reminiscent of Hansel and Gretel in both theme and art (though Impa hardly fulfills the role of the witch). The piece of art itself is rare, having been scanned from an original Japanese guide for {{TLoZ}}, and is of good quality and size. And the transparency job's not too bad, either. I should know, as I took care of that myself ;) {{:User:Alter/sig}} 04:22, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

{{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}} }} {{clear}}
 * 1) I like the art style, and it has pretty good transparency.Ottobot 23:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Uh... the quality of this image is very poor. The edges are ugly: It looks like a Cucco pecked a keyboard to do the transparency. And it looks like it's a low-quality scan that was blown up to size, so it's all pixelated. Frankly I'd be embarrassed to have something with such low quality featured.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 04:27, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) The quality isn't very good, and the transparency is bad considering there's a white line around the whole thing. {{:User:Mandi/sig}} 04:47, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) I'm not a fan of the style, mainly because it makes the image appear blotty and horrible. We're really looking for some higher quality images to feature, not ones that make people look and think "Ew, that's messed up." I know it's really supposed to look that way, but it just isn't presentable. Sorry, but I gotta oppose.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 20:55, 13 September 2010 (EDT)
 * First off, I mistakenly uploaded the wrong file. :P I just replaced it with the most recent one, so the transparency problem's fixed. Also, artwork of that style is usually similar in "quality". That's not a quality issue, I don't believe, but a style issue. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 23:22, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

{{hide|header=Ambrosia Lite.png (Ambrosia Lite) — Failed on October 7, 2010|content= This image really sums up the awesomeness of the Valiant Comics. Whether you're a fan or not, this is a fun, high-quality image (as high as it can get), which 99% of the Zelda population has never seen before now. Cast your vote below, and remember- drink responsibly. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 05:46, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

{{support}} {{oppose}} {{neutral}} {{negated}} }} {{hide When I first saw this image, I was just... wow. The detail is stunning, with the light coming through the leaves and and the shading on the Great Deku Tree himself. It captures the intensity of a new adventure, with Link staring timidly into his darkened mouth. I think it truly is feature-worthy. Rambo Zelda 15:39, 29 October 2010 (EST) {{support}}
 * 1) I don't know why, but I really like this image. Like Alter mentioned, it's not a well-known image, and the details are pretty amazing. Definitely should be featured! Dany36 05:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) This is a great image. Good quality considering it's from the comics, and while some people may wonder why an image like this could be featured, I think that the curiosity raised is a nice opportunity for Zelda fans to learn about the comics. Given their age, there's a good chance that later-generation fans may have never even heard of them before. Shona 09:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Definitely. I still need to get those comics, anyway it'll be good to raise awareness the comics and the older games. PureLocke 22:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, totally unique, and the quality is surprisingly good. I say we have more obscure pics like this in the future! {{User:Pyrobomber/sig}} 02:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) To me, this seems like a rather small part of Zelda and Valiant Comics. It is deatiled, but there's nothing special about it. --F4{[Domino29]} 21:17, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
 * 2) Am I allowed to re-add and re-phrase my vote if it got negated, especially if I feel the negater misunderstood me? Because I wasn't saying that the subject of the picture was bad, I was saying that the picture itself doesn't deserve to be featured. It just looks like a normal picture; nothing special about it. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig}}
 * 3) Although this technically meets all of the criteria, I feel that the image is a little small in terms of resolution. Also, it doesn't really have the visual impact I'm looking for in something that's going on the main page. Aside from that this was nominated 10 months ago and has only gained four supporting votes; that's enough to convince me that it's never going to make it to featured status. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 07:59, 7 October 2010 (EDT)
 * 1) Guys, it's not even that detailed. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig}}08:38, 14 September 2010 (EDT) Negated per opposition guideline # 2.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 02:16, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * header=Great Deku Tree.png (Great Deku Tree) — Failed on February 25, 2011
 * content=
 * 1) This image...it's so opaque, but the thing about it that caught my eye is the shadows. They contrast with the rest of the image so well I want to get my controller and make a new file just so I can compare the image to the tree in the game.{{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 09:33, 2 November 2010 (EDT)

{{oppose}} {{neutral}} Good picture, but please try to find a better, higher-quality version of it for a featured picture. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 19:03, November 25, 2010 (UTC) }} {{hide A big image with fantastic quality, also it shows the three main characters of Spirit Tracks. If viewed at full size, you can see that it is perfectly cropped and not messy. It shows that even the train is an important character in the game. This picture has every right to be featured. --Masked Kafei 06:29, 4 May 2011 (EDT) {{support}}
 * 1) This image isn't that high of quality. It looks rather pixeled and low quality, something you'd see from a crappy scanner.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 21:03, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm going to have to say no here, too. It's way too small and pixelated. It looks like it was scanned out of the Nintendo Power guide, as it's about that size and it's has artifact lines running back and forth on it that look like it's from light leaking into the scanner, like you get when scanning something from a book or magazine. Unless a better version can be found, I don't think this should be featured.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 02:07, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep, unfortunately the size and quality are too limited for this to be used. Maybe if an improved version can be found this could be nominated again. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 08:02, 25 February 2011 (EST)
 * header=File:ST Link Phantom Zelda Spirit Train Artwork.png (Link, Princess Zelda, and the Spirit Train) — Failed on May 6, 2011
 * content=
 * 1) I agree. Even zooming in all the way, the picture is not pixely.  It is very HQ and shows the "characters" of the game.  :3 LegendOfHyrule31 21:00, 5 May 2011 (EDT)

{{oppose}} {{neutral}} }}
 * 1) While there's nothing particularly wrong with this image, I'm not wowed by it at all. There's no weight to it - it's three rather plain, if accurate, renders in one picture. It needs something more notable to qualify for featured status... something that makes me say to myself, "How have I never seen this amazing picture before?!" {{:User:Embyr 75/sig}} 00:53, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) I absolutely agree. There's really nothing that special to me about this picture. If this deserves to be featured, then so does pretty much every other high quality Spirit Tracks artwork we have. There are plenty of amazing, high quality renders around the Wiki. That doesn't mean they all deserve to be featured. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 08:15, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 3) While this image is fantastic in the respect that it really showcases some of the characters of Spirit Tracks, however it's rather bland, and there's nothing extraordinary considering we have much more interesting images from Spirit Tracks.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 18:16, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

{{hide The Mirror of Twilight is a very beautiful work of art yes. Vastly unique. But the back side of the Mirror is just as beautiful and is even more obscure and rarely appreciated. Very few people stop to take a look at the back of the mirror. It is surprisingly intricate and detailed. So I'm choosing to nominate them both at once. This one is for the back of the mirror. Scroll up the page for the front! GO VOTE!{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 01:51, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * header=File:Mirror of Twilight (Back).png (Mirror of Twilight) — Failed on July 10, 2011
 * content=

{{support}}

{{oppose}}
 * 1) The quality here is horrible, and really, who wants to have the back of something as featured? —★ Chip  {{sup|200}}  14:57, 11 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) This image looks spectacular in its thumbnail version, however upon viewing full size... not so much. Not only does the resolution seem to be low, but the transparency is choppy and not to mention the black lines are rather obnoxious looking. It's a beautiful image, just not feature quality. {{:User:Mandi/sig}} 23:04, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Yeah, it's interesting in terms of something to have in the article, but the image doesn't stand on its own merits. The black lines look weird, and the pixels are all quite visible. Also, it's a circular object, but this image isn't even round; it's a regular icosagon! (yes, I had to look the name up) {{:User:Adam/sig}} 16:01, 10 July 2011 (EDT)

{{neutral}} {{clear}} }}
 * 1) I'd nominate this one because it's just so cool, but my only critique would be that it is a bit blurry at full size. I believe that making this image smaller (maybe around 20% smaller) may fix a large percentage of the blurriness; across the wiki in thumbnail form, this image looks highly awe-inspiring! {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 09:16, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) Ditto Cip's sentiments. I love how this is one of those things you don't see often but just looks so cool... if the blurriness can be dealt with, it will have my vote. {{:User:Embyr 75/sig}} 12:52, 11 May 2011 (EDT)

{{hide Came across this ages ago, and I've finally got around to nominating it. Sure, it's a minor item gameplay-wise, and only appeared in one game in the series. But does that matter? I never imagined we'd have such a high-quality image of a treasure sphere; I love how it's got the little puff of smoke, and the colour is so eye-popping. I think it's fun and unique, anyone agree? {{:User:Adam/sig}} 15:36, 11 May 2011 (EDT) {{support}} {{oppose}} {{neutral}}
 * header=TWW Treasure Sphere Model.png (Treasure Sphere) - Failed October 9, 2011
 * content=TWW Treasure Sphere Model.png
 * 1) Brilliant quality and an interesting image. Featuring this image would be a good way to introduce people to an obscure item that they have not seen before. The curling smoke just makes it that much more interesting--Fierce diety 00:23, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) Amazing coloring. Not only is the item itself pretty cool, but I've always thought those treasure orbs looked epic. The smoke at the bottom gives it a very mysterious vibe, too. The Reject Phoenix 03:59, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 3) Whoa, that looks awesome. The smoke looks like a Floormaster a bit AND my favorite color is purple. I never knew they were called Treasure Spheres either. Epicly voting for this.- TriforceSlash 18:19, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 4) Sheesh, man. I always see these and I have to slash at these whenever they appear from any enemies, it's just so surreal and beautiful looking, plus, you really and honestly don't know what will appear in the mystical/mysterious sphere, really. I vote for this, very, very much.  Hylian Historic  14:48, 3 June 2011 (EDT)
 * 1) The quality isn't the best, and I think the picture is kind of odd. The smoke seems to have been taken from another shot. TriforcePieceofWisdom 13:04, 22 June 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) The quality seems quite poor. The smoke does stand out quite a bit more than it ought to, it isn't the same quality as the rest of the image. It looks like it was just pasted over it, just tacked on after the fact, poorly. Several parts of the image are very blurry, which makes an unpleasant contrast with the parts that are very sharp. I just don't see how it stands out.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 05:23, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Now that I've taken a closer look, I'll retract my vote of support for this image. The smoke does indeed look unnatural. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 18:06, 5 September 2011 (EDT)

{{negated}} }}
 * 1) What an excellent render! I could stare at this image for hours on end... If only we could have a looping animated image of this quality that would feature all the colors! A man can always dream! What an amazing picture, though. Definitely has my vote. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 08:17, 12 May 2011 (EDT)

{{hide This picture is very interesting as it is one of the stroybook like scenes from Phantom Hourglasshese kind of scenes are rarely seen so I think this picture deserves to be featured. VOTE!!! Sammoldy 04:20, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
 * header=File:PhantomHourglassscene10.png — Failed on February 28, 2012
 * content=

{{support}}
 * 1) Though small, this image still pulls off the look of a traditionally made collage flawlessly, with crisp colours and textures which really gives off that traditional storybook feel, brimming with legends to tell. Even with the restraints of the small "canvas", every detail has been carefully added and placed; you can still tell what story is being told. With an artistic flair, you cannot deny, this charming piece deserves a feature. Ochibi 06:16, 7 November 2011 (EST)

{{oppose}} {{neutral}} }} {{hide The Mirror of Twilight is a very beautiful work of art that is rarely seen in the series. Vastly unique. But the problem is that arguably the back side of the Mirror is just as beautiful and is even more obscure and rarely appreciated. It's appearance is so intricate and alluring on either side that you can't stop staring at it. (Now we now why Yeta couldn't stop looking at it!) So I'm choosing to nominate them both at once. This one is for the front of the mirror. Scroll down the page for the back! GO VOTE!{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 01:51, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It's a good picture—one that certainly speaks volumes—but I don't think it's so special as to be worth featuring. Generally, when I look at any of our current featured pictures, I could stare at them for hours on end. This one is not particularly dazzling; one quick glance and you've seen all there is to see. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 07:25, 8 November 2011 (EST)
 * 2) I have to agree with Hylian King here. I do not see anything particularly iconic about this image. It seems the moment is not very memorable compared to other events in the game. There are better images represented in the same style as this one, too. It is not a bad image, but it is not Featured Picture worthy either. Noble Wrot 12:51, 17 December 2011 (EST)
 * 3) Not only is this just one of a series of similar images, it's also way too small to feature (I'm certainly not convinced that it meets criteria 3 or 4 of the guidelines above). {{:User:Adam/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST)
 * header=File:Mirror of Twilight (Front).png - Failed on July 12, 2012
 * content=

{{support}}
 * 1) This image is wonderful. it really displays the great detail that went into Twilight Princess. it's a fairly high-quality image and does include one of the Legend of Zelda series basic icons, the legendary Triforce. Vulpix001  19:46, 20 July 2011 (EDT)

{{oppose}}
 * 1) This is image is supported by me because i think the Mirror Of Twilight is a very cool item also if you look at this picture it gives off kind of a rotating illusion.Sammoldy  04:20, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
 * 2) This is a very beautiful image, and it is not blurry or dark. Also, the main focus of the picture is the mirror, because there is no background to get in the way. --12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT)Person777 12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
 * 1) While it looks OK in thumbnail view, I have to say I don't think the image quality is good enough to feature it. There's that weird black line around the inner edge. And the fact that it's angular instead of circular... Also, as a unique magical object, to me it's much more epic when it's actually doing it's thing than just sitting there as a flat surface. EDIT: Plus, this version is significantly better! {{:User:Adam/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST)
 * 2) it's really blurry in the full view, plus the edges are a bit jagged--Themudkipman 12:42, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
 * 3) Agreed on what the previous two comments have said...the image in full view is not as pleasant as the thumbnail view: blurry and rough edges are not qualities of a featured picture. --Dany36 13:57, 12 July 2012 (EDT)

{{neutral}}

{{negated}}
 * 1) This image seems to be of mediocre quality. While viewing the image in full size, i noticed that the black line around the edge of the mirror seemed jagged in some places. I also noticed this with the edges of the image itself. In addition, the entire image appears a little blurry, as if it was scaled up from a smaller image. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 13:13, 27 August 2011 (EDT)
 * Newer version is much better {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 21:46, 15 December 2011 (EST)

{{clear}} }}

{{hide Nintendo has described the graphical style of this game as "a painting coming to life", and who could argue? With its great quality and breathtaking view, this image deserves to be featured. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig|alright, I might be sugar coating this a little}} 23:35, 22 August 2010 {{Support}}
 * header=File:SS Scenery .jpg (Scenery from {{SS}}) — Failed on July 10, 2011
 * content=
 * 1) I support it. It'sa really good image to add and I like the art style. {{:User:Yusei/sig}} 14:53, 5 September 2010 (EDT)
 * 2) Ooh... pretty. Nice, well-drawn image. I think it seems to do a nice job of representing what we've seen of Skyward Sword thus far. However, the image is somewhat bland, and seems to not have any actual focus. The reason I'm OK with that is because there are no other featured images of just scenery. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 19:21, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) I like how the picture is high quality. This deserves to be featured! --Zeldarules8 19:56, 28 December 2010 (EST)
 * 4) Yes. Yes.  Like Alter stated, we don't have a lot of pictures of just scenery.  It's very high quality, and reminds us of the joy of Skyward Sword we are to enjoy.  This deserves to be featured!  PreludeOfHeroes 21:47, 25 January 2011 (EST)
 * 5) I quite enjoy this image. Miyamoto-San's choice of graphic style is of course well made. The nostalgia I felt two years ago when watching 2 years ago are all the more real when I stare into this wonderful image. Steahl 07:59, 10 November 2011 (EST)
 * 6) (I love the style of skyward sword and it is a great representation of the new wave of nintendo games.  This also reminds me of the W.W. storyline as I am playing, All the same it is a great image and a great way to bring zelda into the relm of the 21st century Gannondorf111 08:08, 21 November 2011 (EST)

{{Oppose}} {{Neutral}}
 * 1) As Cip predicted, there are now other similar images of Faron Woods, so nothing to really set this one apart. Also, there are plenty of other, arguably more interesting landscape shots from SS. I feel like the first image we feature from the game should be something more engaging and representative. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST)
 * 2) Indeed. As beautiful as this picture is, I don't find it stands out from the many other awesome Skyward Sword landscapes. Lake Floria, Eldin Volcano, the Ancient Cistern, and the Fire Sanctuary are just a few examples. I wish we could just feature all of them! {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 07:15, 29 February 2012 (EST)
 * 3) The image isn't even sharp, it is dull, and there are already tons of images like this. Why this one? This is one image in a group of many, and it's not that good anyway. I love Skyward Sword and I love Faron Woods, but I don't love this image. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 00:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) I have a strong feeling this image is going to end up being "one in a series", given the Cezanne-like landscape artstyle of Skyward Sword. It wouldn't make any sense if this was the only landscape-like piece Nintendo cranks out in the Skyward Sword era because the image work is so brilliant. I'd just rather wait and see than to vote now. {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 19:06, 3 January 2011 (EST)

{{negated}} }}
 * 1) This image just makes me think about how much I am going to LOVE Skyward Sword. It's a pleasant reminder each time :D  (Unsigned vote - see rule 6 above)
 * 2) I am looking forward to september for skywar sword's release and think that this should be featured.  (Unsigned vote - see rule 6 above)

{{hide
 * header=File:Triforce.jpg (Artwork of the Triforce from {{ALttP}}) — Failed on December 20, 2012
 * content=
 * Score: -3
 * Final Date: April 13, 2013

Very detailed, high-resolution image. Meets featured image criteria, as well as image quality standards. The image is also quite sharp. It also (of course) covers a Zelda-related subject, the Triforce. - Cuddles  {{sup| (Sit next door) }} 22:56, 11 July 2012 (EDT)

{{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}} {{Negated}} }}
 * 1) A lot of compression artifacts on this one. Out of all the images on the wiki, I don't think this one's in the top percentiles in terms of quality. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 21:47, 2 August 2012 (EDT)
 * 2) Definitely not an amazing image. Fine, yes, but not perfect quality and size... it also seems kind of dull. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 21:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I've always liked this image, something about the strange pseudo-religious quality and the colours. But unfortunately the quality of this scan just isn't good enough for me. And I fear that the original (wherever it was printed) is also of low enough quality that it'd be difficult to make anything that looks good enough. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 10:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It's definitely an interesting image, buuuut I'm not so sure about the quality of it... I doubt there is one with better quality floating around the internet, but if there is, I'd be more than glad to give this my support! --Dany36 13:55, 12 July 2012 (EDT)

{{hide This image really shows the high quality of Nintendo's Japanese video game boxart. This boxart is much more detailed than the American and European boxarts, and includes iridescent foil for a colorful effect. The newsprint-like effect on Link is pretty nice. Wwtoonlinkfan 23:45, 16 October 2011 (EDT) {{Support}}
 * header=File:TWW JP Box.jpg The Wind Waker Japanese boxart — Failed on March 16, 2013
 * content=
 * 1) The iridescent effect is quite striking, and as a whole is visually intriguing.  Miles ( talk)   16:33, 23 January 2012 (EST)
 * 2) There is a lot of detail in the image, and the colors look nice.--Player1won 22:14, 18 May 2012 (EDT)
 * 3) Once again we get the short end of the stick. The box art here is stunning and is, (in my opinion) better than the North Amarican box art. --Shyla12323 15:30 17 December 2012 (EST)

{{Oppose}} {{Neutral}}
 * 1) It's kind of interesting looking, I suppose, but I can't say I'm really happy with the idea of prominently showing high-resolution product images like this (since it's something other wikis specifically tend to steer away from for legal reasons). Aside from that vague concern, we already have quite a few WW images featured, two of which have Link and KoRL as their subject matter, so I don't really feel it helps the overall diversity. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 03:05, 29 February 2012 (EST)
 * 2) Adam's hit the nail on the head yet again. It does look cool, but we've got much better stuff than this.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 19:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) The picture itself is okay, but the brand name and text detracts from the picture. It would look less cluttered if the text wasn't there,but the image itself is also messy. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 19:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) I'm with Darkness. It has a pretty cool effect, but the text and branding make it look messy.{{:User:Abdullah/sig}} 16:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) I also have to unfortunately for the above reasons, and also I'd like to repeat what Adam said, we have quite a large number of Wind Waker artworks in the featured section already. We need more from other games, particularly earlier ones. {{:User:Fizzle8094/sig}} 10:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) As has been said before, legal reasons, image messiness. A good photo, but with adjustments I don't know how to do, it would be a great photo.Ankazar 20:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

{{clear}} }}

{{hide I felt that this photo would be an okay nomination, because it shows of the mysteriousness and the power of the Master sword. Vote as you see fit.Ankazar 19:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC) {{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}} }}
 * header=File:Screen Shot 2013-03-12 at 4.33.27 PM.png Master Sword Fan Art — Failed on March 16, 2013
 * content=
 * Score: -3
 * 1) I'm sorry, but this looks like it's fan art. It shouldn't be used on this wiki except for user pages without the creator's permission. It's fine to keep it on your userpage, though. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 15:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Darkness is right. We really haven't allowed fan art to be featured in the past, and I really don't think it's something we should start doing. {{:User:Tony/sig}} 15:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Agreed for reasons already stated. --Dany36 15:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

{{hide I thought that this would be a great nomination because this is the first glimpse of Link in the upcoming WiiU Zelda game! Again, vote as you see fit. Ankazar 01:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC) {{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}} }} {{hide
 * header=File:Linkinwiiu.png (Link in the Zelda HD Experience) — Failed on March 17, 2013
 * content=
 * Score: -3
 * 1) While I think it's an impressive and beautiful image, I don't think it quite captures the state of grandeur typical to Feautured Pictures. {{:User:Tony/sig}} 06:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) If we had an image from the HD Experience demo, it'd be much better to include the one of Link fighting Armogohma. While I love Link's model in this, it is essentially just an HD version of his Twilight Princess and Brawl appearance, and not really that worthy of a featured image, although it does have nice lighting. {{:User:Fizzle8094/sig}} 18:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) This image doesn't seem very impressive to me. The lighting is quite nice, but that's about it. There isn't really anything about this image that's particularly amazing or notable; it's just Link standing there, and it's slightly blurry too. I agree with Fizzle; it'd be far better if we were to feature one of the images of Link fighting Armogohma. Furthermore, we're likely to see much better images in the future when Zelda Wii U is actually released, so we might as well wait until then before we take any action. {{:User:Dannyboy601/sig}} 21:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) This image does appear slightly blurry and small. However, the style of the game/demo does make this image stand out. The graphical style, which resembles a mix of Twilight Princess and Skyward Sword has both dimension and beauty. While I don't think this image is worth being featured, it's still amazing. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 14:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * header= File:Screen Shot 2013-03-19 at 3.54.17 PM.png (Link fighting Armogohma in the Zelda HD Experience)
 * content=

I did my best to make this picture look sharp; it was blurry when I took it. I thought this would be a great nomination because it shows Link fighting a Iconic boss in the new WiiU game demo! Vote as you see fit! Ankazar 20:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC) {{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}} }}
 * Score: -3
 * 1) This image is too low-quality. If we had a high resolution version of this image, I would be all for it. Also, your description seems to imply that you've edited it. It's no secret that I'm deftly against editing images for the wiki beyond making them transparent, so that another resolute "no" from me. {{:User:Tony/sig}} 20:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) I have to agree with Pakkun, here. The image is way too low-res for me to give my support. After all, it's supposed to be a game with HD visuals (that was the whole point of the demo), and a pixellated, low-res image is not a good way to depict that.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 21:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) I agree with everything else that's been said. The image is way too low res to pass as a featured image and it's also small and blurry. The colors blend In some areas, making the image look more like a gray splotch. I think that this image is a much better choice as a featured image featuring the same subject. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 00:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

{{hide| header=File:Zelda Wii U Tech Demo.jpg| content=

Photo credits to Dany36. I thought this was great, considering that it is unedited, and of a high quality. It is also symbolic, in that this is the opening of a new Zelda era. Vote as you see fit. Ankazar 20:19, 20 March 2013 (UTC) {{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}}
 * Final Score: -3
 * 1) While the picture is definitely impressive and detailed, the problem is that we don't have any information yet about the graphical style of the game, so I think it is a bit premature to include it at this point. Zeldafan1982 22:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) I agree with Zeldafan. It's a cool picture, but it doesn't really strike me as "interesting," considering that we know nothing about the game. Hey, as far we know, this might not even be in the game. Tech demos have a fun way of just throwing together something for the sake of showcasing new stuff. It would be more prudent to wait for actual information about the game.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 12:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Yeah I agree that it's a bad idea to include beta and preview images; plenty of examples here of the kind of stuff that doesn't make it into final releases, so not the ideal thing to be featuring. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 14:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Well, I personally don't think that this is "symbolic". The new HD Zelda we know nothing about, so it might be much less realistic. It does, however, show the Wii U's potential, and the image itself is high-quality. Every tiny detail, from the patterns on the torches to the markings on Armogohma's legs, adds contrast to this image. There is an amazing use of shadow and dimension in this image, with every aspect of it standing clearly on a different layer. It's also extremely high resolution. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 12:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

}}

{{hide| header=File:TWW HD.jpg (The Wind Waker HD Screenshot)| content= This image is amazing. It's not only very large and bright, but the colors are vibrant and soft. The realistic shading and reflection effects add to the image. The clouds look beautiful, and so do the detailed textures. You have to look at it in full resolution to see the detail put into the screenshot. There are a series of similar images that are all worthy of being featured, but this one is the best. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 16:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Final score: -4

{{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}}
 * 1) This picture IS great! I took a look at the full resolution photo, and everything you said is right! And this is a WiiU remake? If all the Zelda stuff looks this good on the WiiU, we have found ourselves a new major console. Ankazar 16:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It's not a bad shot, but we have no idea if the final game will look anything like this as this is pretty much the earliest we're seeing it. It's also kind of barren looking, as it's just the island with the new HD lighting style and not much else. We have a lot of Wind Waker images already and I much prefer art to screenshots, also. We're bound to get WAY more impressive Wind Waker WiiU images than this one, so it seems like jumping the gun. {{:User:Fizzle8094/sig}} 18:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm with Fizzle on this one. I think I would personally prefer a high-resolution panoramic screenshot of the original TWW to this, anyway. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 22:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) I'd say news-worthy, but IMO not feature-worthy. Overall I think we'd be better off waiting until the game is released in a couple of months time, when I'm sure we can get some much more impressive in-game images. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 10:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) I'm not too sure about this one. I think it's a very nice image, especially with the HD style. It's also quite a good panoramic; it's taken at an interesting angle and beautifully depicts such an iconic location. However, it does seem rather unpolished. There aren't any ripples or waves on the sea, making the water appear bland and the shadows of the clouds sharp. Also the glow effect leaves a lot to be desired. {{:User:Dannyboy601/sig}} 23:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) This is a nice shot, but the bloom effect seems a tad overdone. Also, as Danny said, it seems unfinished. While it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing to feature, I feel like we'd just get something higher quality later on down the line.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 21:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

}}

{{hide| header=File:ALBW Hyrule Lorule.png (A Link Between Worlds Artwork) — Failed on June 14, 2014 (expired)| content= This is an absolutely beautiful piece of artwork from the upcoming A Link Between Worlds. With it's vivid colors and peaceful, yet dramatic, depiction of Hyrule Castle I think that it's definitely feature worthy. {{:User:Mandi/sig}} 05:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Final score: 6

{{Support}} {{Oppose}} {{Neutral}}
 * 1) I personally think this shows the contrast of the two world well. --Planetbox (talk) 17:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) It's definitely the art piece I think will stand out from the rest for this game, very visually pleasing. - Bwar (talk) 16:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) This artwork is not only a spectacular, high quality piece of art, but is also representative of the game's major themes and is therefore feature worthy in my opinion. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 03:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) I believe that this piece of artwork shows how Lorule is just a flip of how Hyrule is built up. --Infernap (talk) 13:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Beautiful artwork, emphasizing the dichotomy between Hyrule and Lorule. The color choices are excellent, too - the vibrant greens of Hyrule contrast well with the stagnant, dark purples and yellows of Lorule. wwtoonlinkfan (talk) 11:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) I really do love this picture. The reflection of Lorule really enforces the mood of the game. It still graces my desktop well. William (Talk) 19:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

}}