Talk:Link

Changed 'linx' of the name explanation to 'links' and added dutch to the languages, I'm dutch, and understand some good german, and I was somewhat astonished at finding this strange word as told to be in our language....

Link actually has many Indo-European roots, but no one single root should be mentioned, because there is not one single root.

FATAL ERROR!
when I went to the article, it just gave me a page: Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 31457280 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 9600 bytes) in /home/zeldaw/public_html/includes/media/Bitmap.php on line 165

is the article destroyed?


 * No, the article is fine, it's just an error with one of the images. Quite simply, this image Image:Linkbrawl.jpg is extremely large, and thus has been resized within the page to 400 pixels width. It seems that the current image software on the new server we have moved to is unable to render this correctly, hence generating the error you see. The same thing is happening on Jason's page, where he has a high res photo. This image software is causing a number of other problems, such as being unable to render transparent PNG (again related to resize). Jason is aware and is working on a fix. In the meantime, I've reverted the page to Revision as of 23:55, 29 March 2007, before that image was added. Unfortunately this is the only way I can get the page to display, as any attempt to edit a later revision to remove the offending image simply gives another error! I've also protected the page, since there is no point in editing a 6 month old version, but at least it can be viewed now! --Adam 02:22, 12 September 2007 (EDT)

"Merged with Hero of Winds"?
Why would you merg Hero of Winds with Link? The Hero of the Winds isn't a real Link.


 * While I agree with people who say he isn't a descendant of Link, I have to agree with the article Hero Of Winds being merged with Link. Even if he isn't related to him, he's still a Link. He's the main protagonist of The Wind Waker, and his name is Link. Therefore, he's a Link, just not related to The Hero Of Time. (Hero Of Winds and Hero Of Time are two different heroes, two different Links, but they are still Link. Not the same Link, not related, but still, their default names are LINK. Get it?)

That is true -- he had to discover the triforce -- the symbol wasn't on his hand, so he isn't a descendant of Link. Whereas the Link in Twilight Princess starts of the game with the triforce symbol.

True that it is not a real decendet of Link that we know of but it is said that in the end of Ocarina of Time Ganondof says " I will reak revenge on your decendents" so I think that it is right for it to be put in with link

Went through and corrected some grammar mistakes.

NO. Do not merge it.

--

i think that they are differnt the hero of winds is the title bestowed on the person who controles the winds etc in that game and not like so i think the hero of winds subject is differnt to links just my view


 * Yes, but "Hero of Time" redirects to Link. Why shouldn't Hero of Winds do the same? --Jase 13:43, 20 April 2007 (PDT)


 * Absolutely true, this page should be incorporated as a section within Link. Adamcox82 13:59, 20 April 2007 (PDT)


 * I'll do the merger sometime today, then. --Jase 04:21, 21 April 2007 (PDT)

I think in the wind waker that zelda was his desendant while link just happened to be on an island probly with a group of fans that made every kid dress in green at the ceramony.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Yeah, in the Wind waker it states before the game " it beacme customary to garb boys in green"

the Link in the wind waker has no connection whatever to the previos Link(s) or Zelda(s)

and if he didnt already have the triforce on his hand then he's not gonna be link's descendant is he? cos that wuda been passed down too. Think about it.


 * Why is it necessary for a descendant to have the triforce on his hand? If the triforce pieces were scattered, wouldn't it have been impossible for it to be on his hand at the same time? And when the pieces were collected, did it not appear on his hand? Therefore whether or not the triforce is on his hand does not make a descendant - blood lineage does. If any fool can up and find the triforce and have the mark appear on their hand, then every single Link could well be unrelated. However, we know that's not the case, and thus should be inclined to say that the Link in TWW is a direct descendant of the OoT Link. --Jase 18:00, 14 May 2007 (PDT)

Reply to previous comment
But in the game & the book if you flick through and look around AND on the internet or on any trusted zelda info source, It CLEARLY states that The hero of winds isn't a descendant of Link from OoT!!!

Link is mute?
Who went through the article and change it by putting Link is mute? That semmed wuite pointless to me.

Not to mention the fact that Link isn't mute. He has a large number of things that he says, from "Hyah!" to "Huh!" And everything in between

and in the TV series he is always saying excuse me princess.

Maybe the word they're searching for is...something like unsocial or shy or something. I think they mean that he just can't speak english...or whatever language the world speaks.

What the...
May I ask why the Link article is under User:Dachi? Dinosaur bob 08:13, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

Another error about hammerspace.
I doubt any of you have seen the old Legend of Zelda cartoons, but if you have, you would see in the first episode that Link has a pouch in his utility belt that he can put things in. A LOT of things. A bottomless magic pouch, basically. So the comment about the hammerspace should be removed.
 * Ah, but the old cartoons are not canon to the games. ;) Dinosaur bob 19:43, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * I've watched most of The Legend of Zelda (TV series), and it was me who added the hammerspace info. And as Dinobob says, it can be said with a great degree of certainty that the cartoons are not canon; I mean come on, the TRIforce only had two pieces!! Bonus points go to anyone who can point out Link's "bottomless magic pouch" in either of these images... --Adam 02:37, 6 October 2007 (EDT)



I'm not sure...maybe his tunic? Just kidding. (-:

Smash Bros. Info
Does anyone think they can get info up on Link's (both Link and Young Link) moves from the Smash Bros. series like in the Zelda article? Or perhaps get the info into the Adult Link and young Link articles? I thought that was a nice touch for Princess Zelda's article. Dinosaur bob 20:01, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Erm, just noticed this stuff was in the Young Link article, but we could still get the stuff for the Adult Link or just plain Link articles.Dinosaur bob 20:48, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

vandalism
someone messed the page up it should be fixed by a more expirienced memberGanon228 14:17, 26 October 2007 (EDT) I corrected it mostly. -paron dante

Hero Of etc.
May I ask why, if the Hero of Time, Hero of Winds, and Hero of Light articles redirect right back here, why they are in this article's See Also section? Dinosaur bob 22:12, 30 October 2007 (EDT)


 * They used to all be individual articles, which have since been merged into Link. I've removed them from the See Also. --Adam 15:57, 31 October 2007 (EDT)

From my time studying the unique storylines of Zelda and constantly referring to this wiki, it has come to my attention that one listing in the title section for Link reads Hero of Light. It goes even further to explain in the article that he isn't formerly called this in the game and to say that Link used the power of light to defeat the evil in the world although he uses the power of twilight even more so. I believe the proper title used for the hero in Twilight Princess would be Hero of Twilight.

Also, the hero from BS The Legend of Zelda: The Ancient Stone Tablets was named Hero of Light since he/she appeared and departed in a column of light. --Crow

I disagree that "Hero chosen by the Gods" is a title- to me, especially in-game, it sounds more like an explanation of his role in life. As in, he is told that he is the Hero, which is elaborated upon by explaining that he is "chosen by the Gods" to act as such. Dinosaur bob 12:29, 15 November 2007 (EST)

link, link and link
It seems that it is a lot of talking about link "hero of time", link " hero of winds" and link "hero of light". Some want to have separate pages for these characters and others like it as it is. Can't we have it as it is, the link page stays as it is, but we can still have separate pages for the three main links. That is how I would like it. Anybody agree with me?

What does three "main" Links mean? How are the other Links inferior those three? Oh yeah, because they didn't appear in 3D games. I'm not fond of 3D fanboyism, so I have to disagree. Link is Link, no matter what incarnation. It doesn't make sense to make specific articles for a few of his incarnations, but keep the rest in one article. And it makes no sense either to give each Link his own page, because that would then also be required for all other multiple-appearance characters (to keep unity in zeldawiki). IfIHaveTo 03:55, 9 December 2007 (EST)

I think having a single main Link article is the best idea, but i also think and article for young link and toon link is a good idea because of their roles in Smash bros.


 * Surely much of this comes down to a discussion about the contents of Category:Link? Personally I think that "Toon Link" should be a section within Link, not it's own article. This form of Link has no notable differences from previous incarnations other than cosmetic changes, and as such can't be given the same level of focus as other individuals such as Young Link/Adult Link, or the four Links. —Adam (talk) 05:13, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

true--Zanramon :) 10:28, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

Twilight Princess Information
Why did you delete all that information about Link in twilight princess? What was the matter with it? --Link hero of light 19:55, 16 December 2007 (EST)


 * Ok, well the first paragraph had very little relevance to the character of Link. It was just a summary of the storyline, and as such I don't think it belongs in Link's article. It's already written (more eloquently I'm afraid) the Story section of the Twilight Princess page. The second paragraph is just a cut-and-paste from the Midna article, and I don't particularly like it there either. It needs to be written in a more neutral manner, and shortened, since it is just speculation. I know that there are a number of hints, but they're just that. Also, without trying to be critical, it was a bit "all over the place" with regards to spelling and grammar (not something we want to see in the current Featured Article). If you'd like to rework the Midna-Link bit in Midna's article a bit, maybe that could be incorporated here too. Also, if anyone else thinks i'm out of line, please say so :) --Adam 20:26, 16 December 2007 (EST)

Okay, I understand. --Link hero of light 20:45, 16 December 2007 (EST)

Sections Merged
I took it upon myself to merge the sections.

Its at the very bottom of Link. Check and see for yourself

--Vaati Evil 19:10, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Than isn't it more appropriate to put take off the suggestion at the top? Saibh 14:15, 21 March 2008 (EDT)

Relationships
I was wondering how that should be done. A character like Link has changes in his relationships with each character. Saria, who is likely his best friend in OoT, plays no important role in any of the other twelve games. Zelda is always important to Link--there's never been a Link without a Zelda, but they're almost always different Zeldas. Perhaps Ganondorf is the only character whose relationship does not change with Link. S

So I was wondering if relationships should be in their own section, or should be subdivided under each game section. If so, is that just for major characters in particular games, leaving characters like Zelda, Impa, Ganondorf in a bigger, more expansive Relationships section?

Hmm...I'm thinking it's wiser to have characters who transcend individual games have their own spot in each game section. Either that or, only the major characters like Midna, Navi, Marin, etc. are under the games, and the multiple characters among their own. Maybe it should be like this:

==(Game)== ====Relationships==== Character: ...  Character: ...

And so on...

If you chose to only compile major relationships in one section, it may look like this (using Zelda as an example):

==Relationships== ===Zelda=== (I'm not sure if there should be further sections here for games, or just bullets.) ====(game)==== OR * (game):

In the Sandbox I have those two versions.

I think any list of characters should be divided alphabetically, so no one gets silly about who goes first. Saibh 15:09, 21 March 2008 (EDT)


 * Relationships should be described all together in their own, self-contained section. Any other solution would be too chaotic and fragmentary. Alphabetical order would be a good idea. —Adam (talk) 18:13, 24 March 2008 (EDT)