User talk:KrytenKoro/Weapons

Table-form draft
Proposing a table-form draft to organize by levels (which control strength per star and number of slots) and list elements/weapon-type.


 * Going to be completely honest here. That looks incredibly messy and is honestly really unnecessary. I know it sounds like I'm shooting down another idea, but the way the page organizes the weapons now is good enough. -The Goron Moron (talk) 04:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Is it less messy now? I've implemented the table style Pakkun used on the Material page.
 * I believe this version is necessary because it:


 * It clarifies the weapon type, which allows us to link to those pages rather than link through the weapons that are nostalgia bits.
 * It lists the weapon level and element.
 * The stat table provides a helpful guide for those planning to max-out their weapons.
 * Your input is appreciated.KrytenKoro (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late response. Anyway. It still looks very messy.
 * I know you're going to feel "left out" again, but we've been thinking about expanding the entire Weapons page to be more informative on each weapon and the mechanics. At least that is what I think, no final word on that yet. Anyway. It might be better to make a separate table on levels for each Weapon Type, and so they'd be in their own section, rather than all on a giant table. I really don't think the giant table works because of how cluttered it looks. -The Goron Moron (talk) 16:50, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * So, less cluttered, or separated, then? Easy enough.
 * As far as expanding the weapon page -- each weapon works very differently, and is basically a facet of how to use that character. I would strongly recommend just having pages like Link/Hyrule Warriors, as I have previously -- trying to cover all that on one page sounds like it would be a nightmare.KrytenKoro (talk) 17:21, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keeping in mind that I'm still ironing out the image naming schema with William, how does the new version treat ya?KrytenKoro (talk) 17:40, 28 November 2014 (UTC)


 * We don't really do Character/Game though, and would prefer not to. Since each weapon type affects how a character plays out, I think it would be easier and better to keep that all to a weapons page. That way the actual character sections can be more dedicated to character story. Anyway the tables look better now. -The Goron Moron (talk) 20:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * are you talking covering all of it on the current weapons page, or a "gauntlets" etc. page?KrytenKoro (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Well it's as I said earlier, nothing's final. Though someone else is supposed to discuss that with me later... I would think it would be better to just cover it all on one page, since it is the weapons that determine the movesets of characters. -The Goron Moron (talk) 02:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * that sounds like its gonna get real long, especially since there's very little that would be shared.KrytenKoro (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm also not sure if having individual pages for each weapon type would be optimal either. Since the movesets of each character is dependent on the weapon, and since moveset info might get complicated, I'm more in favor of the weapons and moveset info on their own page. This is probably something that needs more discussing among a bigger group of people though. -The Goron Moron (talk) 03:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * what i mean is, the gauntlets work totally different than the shackles. Having a page for the character could make sense, since you would also be able to cover badge recipes, where they get hearts, costumes, base stats, etc, but i would primarily recommend pages that cover just the weapons, possible slot abilities, and movesets.KrytenKoro (talk) 18:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)