Zelda Wiki:Featured Article Nomination

= Currently Nominated =

Rauru
I believe that Rauru is very worthy of receiving featured article status. Although it is a bit short, it is very well-written and thorough. It properly sources it's information, and the images are of high-quality. This page needs your vote! 21:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) I think that Rauru is great he helps link.  --Link6767 23:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) This is very small page. The references alone make up nearly a third of the page. It is way too brief to be featured. 23:34, March 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes. It is quite short. Reference section is longer than the actual page. Not long enough to be featured. 23:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Warping
Finally a lengthy page not concerning characters or games. Informative and concise enough to be a resource for all of the series applicable titles. Interesting to read and get the whole picture of the function as gaming progressed. As a bonus, it could serve as an example of what other articles spanning throughout the series could be. 04:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) I'm for it. It' got a nice amount of images, very lengthy in size, nicely laid out, etc. I think this would make a great featured article. 16:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Me too RupeeLord 17:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) I second that. --The Game Master 20:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Above votes negated per support guidelines at the top of the page. 20:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) The article is well written and very detailed. Refreshing, considering it is not concerning characters or games. Totally feature worthy. 22:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) The article is written well, decent length, and has plenty of details. Considering it isn't concerning any of the characters or games, this is very good.  04:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Sage
With the work of the Zelda Wiki community, this article has become a well written, and informative page. Quite an accomplishment to everyone who contributed. 04:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) It seems to me to be rather well organized. And it has a very appealing overall layout. And it certainly fits the other criteria. 23:37, March 28, 2009 (UTC)

= Previously Featured Articles =

(Voting Archive) (Failed Nominations) The featured articles are listed in this format: Articles that have been disqualified are in the format:
 * Name of Article (Date it became featured)
 * Name of Article (Date it became featured) (Date disqualified)

Here are the featured articles: 
 * The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (N/A) (May 27, 2008)


 * Zelda Timeline (N/A) (May 27, 2008)


 * Ganon (N/A)


 * Boomerang (N/A) (October 14, 2008)


 * Stalfos (July 7, 2007)


 * ZeldaInformer (August 1, 2007) (June 12, 2008)


 * Lake Hylia (October 2, 2007) (November 24, 2008)


 * Zant (October 16, 2007)


 * Dark Link (November 5, 2007)


 * Link (December 15, 2007)


 * Princess Zelda (January 28, 2008)


 * Link's Crossbow Training (February 13, 2008)


 * Dodongo (February 15, 2008)


 * Moblin (February 18, 2008)


 * Majora's Mask (Boss) (March 8, 2008)


 * Pedestal of Time (April 6, 2008)


 * Triforce (May 17, 2008)


 * Midna (June 12, 2008)


 * Master Sword (June 17, 2008)


 * Gerudo (July 21, 2008)


 * Darknut (August 30, 2008)


 * The Golden Goddesses (October 15, 2008)


 * Veran (November 24, 2008)


 * Goron (March 12, 2009)