Zelda Wiki:Failed Nominations/Picture

Failed Picture Nominations
The following sections are picture nominations that received at least three signed opposition votes.

{{hide|header=Link and Ezlo Still Life.png (Link and Ezlo Still Life) — Failed on May 10, 2010|content=

Link and Ezlo Still Life
Boy do we love The Minish Cap here at ZW! This image brilliantly captures the relationship between Link and Ezlo, reminiscent of Link and Navi from Ocarina of Time - Ezlo always tries to provide Link advice and "get through to Link's head", literally! With it's expertly done transparency, cartoony, yet vivid contrast, and nice size, this image is definitely overqualified for the Featured Pictures category! 21:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I like it. :) Very defining, and an somewhat unfamiliar piece of work. +1 22:39, April 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow, my b. I did not realize that this image was one in a series of similar images, all depicting Ezlo and Link in a similar manner. :( 21:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) I vote against for the same reason as Cip, here. It's one of a series of similar images. Nothing unique about it. 03:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Yeah, sorry Cip! It's a funny image but you make a good point. :P Dany36 03:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

}}

{{hide|header=Spirit Tracks Artwork — Failed on July 28, 2010|content=

Spirit Tracks Artwork
This image is interesting and has great quality. Definitely sums up the awesomeness of Spirit Tracks. 07:17, December 30, 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Well I think it's a good image, despite what Alter said. It has much more positive things to be a Featured Image instead of that one fault. It has nice colors and perspective. It shows fierceness in Link... Etc.  23:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Oppose per opposition guideline part "E". Several variations of the images make for an unimpressive Featured Image. 18:18, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I have to agree with Alter. It's not terribly unique, really. It's the same sort of thing we've seen in the artworks from PH and TMC, which make for a generally bland feel. We've got much better ST images than just this, so why settle? :P 21:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) I agree as well. The image is generic, rather uninteresting, and really no different than the hundreds of other, similar images of Link, the Phantom, and the Spirit Train. 1337star 21:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

}}

{{hide|header=Link and Impa — Failed on September 13, 2010|content=

Impa and Link Artwork
I'm not sure what it is that caused me to look at this picture and think "Oh, boy! I think I'll nominate this for a Featured Image!". For some reason, it just struck as interesting, in a good sort of way. I love the image as a whole; it feels reminiscent of Hansel and Gretel in both theme and art (though Impa hardly fulfills the role of the witch). The piece of art itself is rare, having been scanned from an original Japanese guide for The Legend of Zelda, and is of good quality and size. And the transparency job's not too bad, either. I should know, as I took care of that myself ;) 04:22, July 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) I like the art style, and it has pretty good transparency.Ottobot 23:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Uh... the quality of this image is very poor. The edges are ugly: It looks like a Cucco pecked a keyboard to do the transparency. And it looks like it's a low-quality scan that was blown up to size, so it's all pixelated. Frankly I'd be embarrassed to have something with such low quality featured. 04:27, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) The quality isn't very good, and the transparency is bad considering there's a white line around the whole thing. 04:47, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) I'm not a fan of the style, mainly because it makes the image appear blotty and horrible. We're really looking for some higher quality images to feature, not ones that make people look and think "Ew, that's messed up." I know it's really supposed to look that way, but it just isn't presentable. Sorry, but I gotta oppose. 20:55, 13 September 2010 (EDT)

}}
 * First off, I mistakenly uploaded the wrong file. :P I just replaced it with the most recent one, so the transparency problem's fixed. Also, artwork of that style is usually similar in "quality". That's not a quality issue, I don't believe, but a style issue. 23:22, September 13, 2010 (UTC)