Category talk:Beta Content

Suitability
Hmmm, I'm in two minds about this category. Where do we draw the line between theory and rumour, and actual removed game content? Anyway, if this is to stay, I'd say the following would constitute valid content: 18:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Armos Titan
 * other stuff


 * A valid concern. My basic idea with this category was this: The beta content exists. That is fact. So I figure that the articles can exist that discuss this factual information. And since we do have a theory template for sections marked with theory, I figure also that the articles can discuss possible explanations for what this content might have been intended for (without being too outlandish, obviously). But I'd say that as long as the articles cover as much of the factual information as possible (this is what it is, this is where it's been seen / why we know it exists, etc.), they should be good. 21:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, I totally forgot about the Armos Titan. I knew there was something else! :P

OK, sorry to harp on about this, but I just can't see how this will work as a category. Not all of the beta content has its own articles; most of it is included as sections within existing articles, so it can't be categorised here. I think the best way to do this would be to creat a "Beta Content" article, with sections for each game and links to the few things with their own articles. 20:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * If we made a page for everything, they'd be too small. I like this article idea better than a category. Go for it. 21:01, January 18, 2009 (UTC)