User talk:Justin Folvarcik

  Archives: Archive 1 (Sep-Oct 09) Archive 2 (Oct-Dec 09) Archive 3 (Dec 09-Feb 10) Archive 4 (Feb-May 10)

Re: SMW Page
No prob!! It was something relatively easy to do, I just went through the Main Page talk archives :) --Tucayo 17:52, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Category redirect
Hi, I have a question. There is a category: It's (I wrote it un-wikified because, otherwise, it puts this talk page in there). Only two articles are part of it. It used to have more articles until a merge of all the TP Hidded Skills took place, and now it's useless. I'm interested on redirecting it to the Abilities category; but I'm concerned about the two articles that are still listed there because, if I redirect the page, the articles will have a category that is just a redirect to another. I'm afraid of screwing something in the process. What should I do first? --K2L 00:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Well...since the hidden skills have been merged, it's really not necessary. So I think it'd be better to just delete it. Also, to link to categories or files without displaying the image or categorizing a page, type Category:Name or File:Name (place a colon in front of the namespace.) I'll ask some people and see what comes out of it. 01:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip. One more thing: The now-moribund category is a sub-category for the Sidequests category. Knowing that finding most of the Hidden Skills is optional, is it OK to add the Hidden Skills article into that category (sidequests)? --K2L 01:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I'm goind to do it myself. --K2L 02:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

You have a message on User talk:Tepples
about using the game to hack the Wii vs. using other tools to hack the game --Tepples 20:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Archive
Now that waters are flowing normally among us, I have a question: How can I record the sections of my talk page into an archive? I'm interested on having new space in there. --K2L 22:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, to archive, simple copy all the text from your talk page and place it in a page titled something like User:K2L/archive. Next, remove the content from your talk page. You're done :P If you need more help, check out Help:Archiving or ask away! 23:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, man! --K2L 00:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Welcome! =D 14:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Re:Removing content
The paragraph was duplicated.KrytenKoro 15:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. Sorry about that! That's what I get for patrolling at 4 in the morning :P
 * Oh, but could you try to keep conversations on one page? I can see when you respond on your own page because I have it on my watchlist. It's just nice to keep whole conversations in one place for archiving sakes is all. 15:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Background color
I was checking your userbox (just for curiosity, mind you =P), and a section caught my attention. You wrote a small text that had behind a black background. I'm interested to put the text of my userpage in a brown background. Can you teach me do that, please? --K2L 06:28, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely sure what you mean...Could you elaborate a bit? And what text are you referring to on my page? There's a lot of stuff >.> 06:41, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I mean this. You wrote a small sentence in a black background. I want to do that with the text of my userpage, but using brown. --K2L 06:46, 3 July 2010 (UTC) (P.S.: Below that section is also a cyan-colored infobox. Seriously, I want to have one of these as well O_o)
 * Ohh, my SANDBOX! I see. Okay, to put it in a brown background, you have two options: use a div or a span. If you want to use a div, type this: Text
 * For a span, type Text . Now, for the infobox, I made a standard one but customized the color and stuck my personal image in it. Let me whip up the coding for ya...


 * Hope this helps :) 15:40, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't notice I used the wrong word ( userbox sandbox). Embarrasing >_<. Thanks for the help, pal! =D --K2L 16:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC) (P.S.: I had to use black color instead for the background, since I noticed "brown" was ..... everything except brown (it was more like crimson)).
 * No prob, dude :) 18:25, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Question
How do I view my password? Thx in advance. <><FISH!!! Zelda nexgen
 * You can have it emailed to yourself via your preferences. You cannot view it from the wiki due to security reasons. 01:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks! Muchos Gracias! Merci beaucoup! Grazie molto! Domo arigoto gozaimasu! viel Dank!
 * Ya welcome :) But please make sure to sign your posts with four tildes (~) on talk pages :P 02:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Um...Two more questtions; I cannot seem to find the place to e-mail the password, and what do you mean by (Zelda nexgen INC. 03:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC))? Thx again! Zelda nexgen
 * Oh, my bad. Seems that you have to email it from the login form. Click "forgot your password?" or whatever it says. Also, take a look at what happened to those tildes you typed ;) They became your signature. 03:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. I feel stupid... :3 Zelda nexgen INC. 03:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Don't! It's perfectly okay to make mistakes and not know things :P Even I mess up sometimes. Just remember that nobody's perfect :) 03:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Jesus is...o.O Zelda nexgen INC. 15:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * XD That he is, my friend, that he is. 15:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Community pages
Has been long since I last talked to you (doesn't seem so here, as my last message is just two sections above from this page =P). I began having a certain idea after adding references to the Reception, Gameplay and Legacy sections from the OOT page (as well as the Reception section from the ALTTP page). This idea is in hypothetical status, and it will likely need a widespread support from the entire ZW community, .... and possibly most of the Zelda community pages.

Here it is, brought to your talk page before any other place. It's as follows: Do you think it would be a good idea to, when writing about how well-received a Zelda game is, include reviews or good-reputation articles of, say, the  fan community sites? You know, just to reflect the fans' sentiments towards a game in particular. This idea came to my mind because, gosh, when I'm writing a Reception section, I'm basically consulting the same professional sources Wikipedia does; just to make things clear, I'm NOT copying Reception sections verbatim from Wikipedia, I'm just recurring to the same sources (IGN, GameSpot, Eurogamer, etc.), although that itself is admittedly dissapointing. You see, ZeldaWiki is a wiki site that represents in good part the players' passion towards the Zelda series (especially now that the great SS is on the way), and it's affiliated with numerous community sites that have fans debating numerous (and very fascinating) topics on Zelda.

Then I though that, perhaps, Reception sections could include different sections, one of them being dedicated to reviews written from the webmasters or staff of the community sites we know like our own names. The community sites are the closest thing this wiki can have to fans' opinions about the games, and recurring merely to professional journalists' opinions is just sad, because not all of them think the same way fans do. Ever noticed, for example, most journalists' unbashable love for Twilight Princess, and therefore the lack of voices that prefer underdogs like Majora's Mask or The Wind Waker? I'm not saying I like or dislike either game, it's just an example.

In a TL,DR nutshell: How about the idea of having Reception sections in game articles divided in Sales, Juornalist Reviews and Community Reviews? That is: the money, the "professional" critics and the fans .... all of their voices echoed in the same section. The latter two pieces of info are already in nearly every game article, it's the latter one that would make a key difference between ZeldaWiki and Wikipedia (and, for that matter, Zeldapedia). I somewhat managed to barely improve fan reception info on certain game articles (MM, TWW) based on the reader/user lists and scores .... found on IGN, GameSpot and websites that RARELY echo the sentiments of fans and not just theirs. But, alas, it's very difficult to do things that way.

Try to talk to fellow editors (preferably through private means, you know ZP has spies =P) about this. Well, that's all for now, and thanks for your valuable time. --K2L 01:50, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
 * Ah, totally just saw the TL;DR section :P I'll bring this up with some others and we'll see where it goes. It sounds like a good idea, honestly. I can't make promises, but I can say it definitely sounds good ;) I'll get back to you ASAP. 11:30, 2 September 2010 (EDT)