Template talk:Races

I pose the same argument here as I did with the other - are they really necessary? These sorts of templates are made null because we have entire categories that list the races and such. If a person wants to quickly find a race, the category for Races is where to go - I think this kind of template is really better suited to sites that don't only have Zelda material. --Jase 19:10, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Enemy races
Should Garo really be included when things like Bulblins are not? Garo are described as a race, but they're primarily enemies. This template seems to be for neutral/friendly races, which Garo are not. They're always enemies. If Garo are included, then Bulbins, Moblins, Lizalfos, and other by extension should be included. Ganondorfdude11 22:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * THEY ARE A DEAD RACE NOW GHOSTS DUH!


 * Then why aren't things like Poes, Ghinis, ReDeads, Stalfos, and others listed here? Ganondorfdude11 22:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * they dont mention where they originally came from only garos did
 * I agree with GD11, Gibdos and Garo would be special cases or something, and so many of the bosses speak, so it's definitely another classification. Just not necessarily a race. Mostly it's trivia, imo. 20:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Non-Cannon Races
Is it cool if I add races outside of the games like the Watarara to the List? Theres a few races missing like the Humans and non-nintendo games (i.e. Zelda CD-i games) like the Goblins that are missing. --Heroofstuff 04:06, 12 February 2011 (EST)