Talk:Dragon (Animated Series)

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 January 2013 by Dany36
Jump to navigation Jump to search

There is absolutely no way a conjectural title from non-canon material should take precedence over things like a dungeon in the first game. And while not as important as the dungeon, Dragon (Game & Watch) is officially called that, so should take precedence over this anyway. Therefore, I think the disambig page belongs here, and this page needs to be moved to "Dragon (animated series)". --SnorlaxMonster 06:01, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That was my point in adding the template, so I'll do this as soon as possible. User:Fizzle8094/sig 18:20, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Actually, I was thinking, shouldn't all of the TLoZ dungeons just be without the (Dungeon) part in the title? Since that IS the official name of the dungeon, then I don't see why we should first direct the readers to a disambig page or some obscure character from non-canon material and THEN make them go to the dungeon. The only one that should be a disambig is Moon, since that is the name of both the dungeon in TLoZ and...the final dungeon in MM. Basically:
  • Move Eagle to Eagle (Tingle's Love Balloon Trip) as suggested by Snorlax and make Eagle the dungeon page.
  • Move Moon to Moon (Object) and Moon (Dungeon) to Moon (The Legend of Zelda) [or...perhaps leave TLoZ's page as (Dungeon) for sake of consistency with Death Mountain (Dungeon)?]. The Moon page would end up being a disambig for the TLoZ and MM dungeons.
  • Move Snake to Snake (disambiguation) and make Snake the dungeon page.
  • Move Dragon to Dragon (animated series) and make Dragon the dungeon page.
  • Move Demon to Demon (disambiguation) and make Demon the dungeon page.
  • Move Lion to Lion (Tingle's Love Balloon Trip) and make Lion the dungeon page.
I hope that makes some sense. Most of the main articles of the dungeons are either disambigs or lists or characters from non-canon material that shouldn't even take up the main name of the LoZ dungeons. What do you guys think? --Dany36 19:31, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Got my support, Dany. All those sound good to me.User:Justin ZW/sig 03:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm fine with that. The only reason I did not do this already is because it seemed like I was stretching people's limits at the time by moving them at all. The dungeons are definitely more important than many of the pages that already take those names. But it was a big deal moving them all as it was. The only odd one out is the Moon page. By the way, the Moon is not a dungeon in MM, just a location, but it does contain four dungeons, which, at the moment, are on incorrect names... I think. I should look into that. User:Fizzle8094/sig 03:50, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Well...so should Moon (Dungeon) stay as? Or move it to Moon (The Legend of Zelda)? Or what? That's the only one I'm kind of unsure what to do with. :X --Dany36 07:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I would keep it as dungeon to keep it consistent with Death Mountain, at least for now. User:Fizzle8094/sig 13:30, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I think Moon is fine as-is. The rest sounds good, though. — Hylian King [*] 13:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So...I just realized that Demon should probably not be moved to Demon (disambiguation) since it's like...a full-blown article or something. So I'm thinking to instead moving it to Demon (Species) or Demon (Race), though even then I'm not too sure. Thoughts? --Dany36 07:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That page bugs me since it's effectively just a disambiguation page, it mostly just lists some notable demons... some of which just seem to be standard monsters. I would suggest moving it to Demon (Race), as they're not really a species but more like a tribe, and we can work on it and limit it to those characters who are specifically called demons like Ghirahim and perhaps get some idea of their hierarchy. User:Fizzle8094/sig 12:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. I'll wait a little bit before we finish this up. --Dany36 17:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]