Template talk:Void: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 21 June 2008 by Mjr162006
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::The description of [[wikipedia:Template:Void|this template]] at Wikipedia (and also the info on it's talk page) explains what this may be used for, but that there are other alternatives that don't require a template at all. I'd say this can go. --[[User:Adamcox82|Adamcox82]] 07:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | ::The description of [[wikipedia:Template:Void|this template]] at Wikipedia (and also the info on it's talk page) explains what this may be used for, but that there are other alternatives that don't require a template at all. I'd say this can go. --[[User:Adamcox82|Adamcox82]] 07:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
I know they are unused templates, but it is still weird not putting in noinclude tags. This void one can still be useful for the conditional statements. But we'd have to try it. nowiki tags don't work in those conditional statements. | |||
:{{#ifeq:<nowiki>a</nowiki>|<nowiki>a</nowiki>|yes|no}}<br> | |||
See this should say yes, but it says no. It is because each set of nowiki tags gets its own unique id for its value in these statements. I'm not sure we'd have the same problem with this template.--[[User:Mjr162006|Mjr162006]] 07:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:43, 21 June 2008
This template is required for advanced templates such as Template:Enemy.
- Is this template even necessary for the enemy template anymore? It is in Unused templates. But this one will be very useful for the conditional statements. We can call this template instead of just leaving the field blank.--Mjr162006 04:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- The description of this template at Wikipedia (and also the info on it's talk page) explains what this may be used for, but that there are other alternatives that don't require a template at all. I'd say this can go. --Adamcox82 07:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I know they are unused templates, but it is still weird not putting in noinclude tags. This void one can still be useful for the conditional statements. But we'd have to try it. nowiki tags don't work in those conditional statements.
- no
See this should say yes, but it says no. It is because each set of nowiki tags gets its own unique id for its value in these statements. I'm not sure we'd have the same problem with this template.--Mjr162006 07:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)