User talk:Mandi2517@legacy41958928: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
User talk:Mandi2517@legacy41958928 (view source)
Revision as of 03:13, 14 February 2010
, 14 February 2010→Timeline thing
| Line 199: | Line 199: | ||
::No I'm sorry but it was NOT confirmed by Nintendo. It was said on the back of the AlttP box. Later on, Miyamotto stated this: | ::No I'm sorry but it was NOT confirmed by Nintendo. It was said on the back of the AlttP box. Later on, Miyamotto stated this: | ||
- "Ocarina of Time is the first story, then the original Legend of Zelda, then Zelda II: The Adventure of Link, and finally A Link to the Past. It's not very clear where Link's Awakening fits in--it could be anytime after Ocarina of Time." | |||
source: http://www.miyamotoshrine.com/theman/interviews/111998.shtml | source: http://www.miyamotoshrine.com/theman/interviews/111998.shtml | ||
Then later on Dan Owsen stated this: | Then later on Dan Owsen stated this: | ||
- Dan: The truth is, the text on the box (and possibly the Nintendo Power guide) is wrong. D'oh! If you just ignore the box text, the stories fit together better. Basically, the events in Ocarina are the "Imprisoning War" described in the SNES version's story. The Golden Land was the Sacred Realm before Ganondorf corrupted it. The order of the stories is: Ocarina, Zelda 1, Zelda 2, A Link to the Past. Since Link's Awakening was a dream (or was it?) it's hard to say where it fits." | |||
source: http://forums.legendsalliance.com/topic/12128-help-cataloguing-creator-comments-on-timeline/page__p__306763#entry306763 | source: http://forums.legendsalliance.com/topic/12128-help-cataloguing-creator-comments-on-timeline/page__p__306763#entry306763 | ||
I would not test me. You have been proven wrong. Deal with it. | I would not test me. You have been proven wrong. Deal with it. | ||
