Talk:Onox: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 21 November 2008 by Yuvorias in topic Part this thing!
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
''Then edit it to '''not''' be a stategy guide, yeah? BECAUSE THAT HUGE DRACONIC THING DESERVES HIS OWN PAGE!!!'' | ''Then edit it to '''not''' be a stategy guide, yeah? BECAUSE THAT HUGE DRACONIC THING DESERVES HIS OWN PAGE!!!'' | ||
::No. If Beast Ganondorf doesn't get his own page, Dark Dragon doesn't either. Standards, you see? After all, we might as well give Stallord's Skull his own page with this in mind. It's not going to happen. --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 04:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:19, 21 November 2008
Any relation to Eox?--Claire 18:13, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Major bosses
What, so Onox isn't a major enemy or boss?
- Clearly not according to someone. I think that may have been accidental though. I've added him back in now. —Adam (talk) 18:43, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
Part this thing!
Who merged the Onox and Dark Dragon pages? I say we part them back. Stallord 18:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- The Dark Dragon page was almost completely a strategy guide. This site is an encyclopedia, not a guide on how to beat the games. If you want strategy, then you'll have to go to GameFAQs or something.User:Matt/sig 19:00, November 20, 2008 (UTC)
Then edit it to not be a stategy guide, yeah? BECAUSE THAT HUGE DRACONIC THING DESERVES HIS OWN PAGE!!!
- No. If Beast Ganondorf doesn't get his own page, Dark Dragon doesn't either. Standards, you see? After all, we might as well give Stallord's Skull his own page with this in mind. It's not going to happen. --Felicia's Champion 04:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)