Talk:Goddess Sword: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Theory== | ==Theory== | ||
There is a theory at the Zelda Univers that i don't know if we should have in the article. It was thought tha since the sages made the Master Sword, and Hylia made the Goddess Sword, that later became Master Sword, the sages maybe helped Hylia to creat the blade. Should this be written as a "Theory"? | There is a theory at the Zelda Univers that i don't know if we should have in the article. It was thought tha since the sages made the Master Sword, and Hylia made the Goddess Sword, that later became Master Sword, the sages maybe helped Hylia to creat the blade. Should this be written as a "Theory"? | ||
: Would you be able to provide a link to the forum topic in which this is discussed? If so, then yes. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 10:35, 10 January 2012 (EST) | : Would you be able to '''provide a link to the forum topic''' in which this is discussed? If so, then yes. We require new theories to be widely accepted by the community at a minimum before they go on a page; this is because we are the "community's wiki" and need to be as accurate as possible, especially when dealing with non-factual information. Thanks for the heads up! {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 10:35, 10 January 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:40, 10 January 2012
Recent articles have revealed that the sword's name is the "Goddess Sword". Spoon Link 12:54, 1 October 2011 (EDT)
You are indeed right, It appears on multiple occasions, and it is similar to "Phi" and "Fi" (which has already been moved). I'm in favor.
Purlo's Grandfather {Talk||Contributions} 20:52, 1 October 2011 (EDT)
Theory
There is a theory at the Zelda Univers that i don't know if we should have in the article. It was thought tha since the sages made the Master Sword, and Hylia made the Goddess Sword, that later became Master Sword, the sages maybe helped Hylia to creat the blade. Should this be written as a "Theory"?
- Would you be able to provide a link to the forum topic in which this is discussed? If so, then yes. We require new theories to be widely accepted by the community at a minimum before they go on a page; this is because we are the "community's wiki" and need to be as accurate as possible, especially when dealing with non-factual information. Thanks for the heads up! — ciprianotalk 10:35, 10 January 2012 (EST)