Talk:Skull Kid: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 8 November 2013 by Dekler in topic Few Issues with the OoT Skull Kid Article.
(→Few Issues with the OoT Skull Kid Article.: new section) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
First, the Skull Kid transformation can't be compared to Stalchildren because it's already been established that Stalchildren are cursed soldiers. Although, this is what I also thought I think the evidence is against it. Two, the 3DS version changes it from kids to Kokiri, I'll grab the quote but don't have any text dumps at the moment. This might help the confusion.. --[[User:Smighty|Smighty]] 09:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC) | First, the Skull Kid transformation can't be compared to Stalchildren because it's already been established that Stalchildren are cursed soldiers. Although, this is what I also thought I think the evidence is against it. Two, the 3DS version changes it from kids to Kokiri, I'll grab the quote but don't have any text dumps at the moment. This might help the confusion.. --[[User:Smighty|Smighty]] 09:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I propose we remove this entire "there is speculation" nonsense entirely. Speculation has no place in a Zelda Wiki article. [[User:Dekler|Dekler]] ([[User talk:Dekler|talk]]) 01:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:26, 8 November 2013
Few Issues with the OoT Skull Kid Article.
First, the Skull Kid transformation can't be compared to Stalchildren because it's already been established that Stalchildren are cursed soldiers. Although, this is what I also thought I think the evidence is against it. Two, the 3DS version changes it from kids to Kokiri, I'll grab the quote but don't have any text dumps at the moment. This might help the confusion.. --Smighty 09:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- I propose we remove this entire "there is speculation" nonsense entirely. Speculation has no place in a Zelda Wiki article. Dekler (talk) 01:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)