Zelda Wiki:Hyrule Castle/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Zelda Wiki:Hyrule Castle/Archive 2 (view source)
Revision as of 20:19, 28 September 2016
, 28 September 2016Updating links -Link Lab
mNo edit summary |
m (Updating links -Link Lab) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== Categories and Sub-Categories == | == Categories and Sub-Categories == | ||
They're a mess. More to the point: What determines if an article is categorized in a category in addition to that category's parent category? There are things like [[:Category:2D games]] and [[:Category:Enemies in | They're a mess. More to the point: What determines if an article is categorized in a category in addition to that category's parent category? There are things like [[:Category:2D games]] and [[:Category:Enemies in A Link to the Past]], which are, but then [[:Category:Forests]], which aren't, and even ones like [[:Category:Mario]] and [[:Category:Villages]] which are ''sometimes''. So, is there standard, or have people just been shoving these randomly together? (The latter seems more likely, honestly.) --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 04:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Good question, and yeah, it's just been up to the discretion of the editor. We should decide what to do, though. In my opinion, adding something to a category and its parent category... kind of defeats the purpose of having the sub-category to begin with. I vote that all offending articles have the sub-category's parent category removed. All in favor? {{:User:Ando/sig}} 17:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC) | :Good question, and yeah, it's just been up to the discretion of the editor. We should decide what to do, though. In my opinion, adding something to a category and its parent category... kind of defeats the purpose of having the sub-category to begin with. I vote that all offending articles have the sub-category's parent category removed. All in favor? {{:User:Ando/sig}} 17:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
