Talk:Wind Waker (Item): Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 21 October 2008 by Green Tunic in topic Move
mNo edit summary |
(→Move) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Yeah but at the moment there is only one. One could say that it's the Wind Waker. If there were many of these one could say "pass me that wind waker" but since there's only one then I believe it should stay.--[[User:Green Tunic|Green]] 05:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC) | Yeah but at the moment there is only one. One could say that it's the Wind Waker. If there were many of these one could say "pass me that wind waker" but since there's only one then I believe it should stay.--[[User:Green Tunic|Green]] 05:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:True. But the problem is that words like "the" are not supposed to be in the title unless it is really part of the name. Since it is not part of the name. It is not encyclopedic to have it remain as it is.{{:User:Mjr162006/sig}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">05:20, October 21, 2008 (UTC)</span><br><small>P.S. Just ask I'll rant about how dumb the people at Wikipedia are about page titles. I could go on for hours about how idiotic they are!</small> | |||
Revision as of 05:20, 21 October 2008
Move
Yeah, the game is "The Wind Waker" but the item is just "Wind Waker". An unnecessary word.User:Mjr162006/sig 05:08, October 21, 2008 (UTC)
Yeah but at the moment there is only one. One could say that it's the Wind Waker. If there were many of these one could say "pass me that wind waker" but since there's only one then I believe it should stay.--Green 05:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- True. But the problem is that words like "the" are not supposed to be in the title unless it is really part of the name. Since it is not part of the name. It is not encyclopedic to have it remain as it is.User:Mjr162006/sig 05:20, October 21, 2008 (UTC)
P.S. Just ask I'll rant about how dumb the people at Wikipedia are about page titles. I could go on for hours about how idiotic they are!