Talk:Rito: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
no edit summary
No edit summary |
GoldenChaos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Considering that the Zora symbol appears on Medli's dress, in addition to several other references cited in the article directly from the game, the theory of Zora evolution is just about as sure as the existence of gravity (to which is known, but not the source of gravity). I think the article should state evolution as a '''legend''' rather than a '''theory''' at this point. --Marinko 11:48, 18 May 2007 | :Considering that the Zora symbol appears on Medli's dress, in addition to several other references cited in the article directly from the game, the theory of Zora evolution is just about as sure as the existence of gravity (to which is known, but not the source of gravity). I think the article should state evolution as a '''legend''' rather than a '''theory''' at this point. --Marinko 11:48, 18 May 2007 | ||
::: The problem is, it may not be ''evolution''. They could have been transformed by magic, and probably were. Therefore, to call it evolution would be inaccurate. Obviously, the entire thing is a subject of debate and probably should be left out of the article altogether, or at least called something rather neutral. --[[User:GoldenChaos|Jase]] 13:02, 18 May 2007 (PDT) | |||
