Community talk:ZeldaInformer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
GoldenChaos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:[[User:GoldenChaos|Jason]] owns both this wiki and ZU, and hasn't seen fit to make any changes or comment on the wording. If you want to reword it more neutrally, go ahead. --[[User:Adamcox82|Adam]] 03:06, 28 November 2007 (EST) | :[[User:GoldenChaos|Jason]] owns both this wiki and ZU, and hasn't seen fit to make any changes or comment on the wording. If you want to reword it more neutrally, go ahead. --[[User:Adamcox82|Adam]] 03:06, 28 November 2007 (EST) | ||
:::I haven't really read through the article to know there was bias. I just look at the screenshots. ;)... but, uh, I'll admit that this is a bit surprising. I knew some people had their opinions, but didn't imagine it would get suck in the article. If anybody wants to fix it they can, but I'm not going to bother. --[[User:GoldenChaos|Jase]] 08:47, 28 November 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 13:47, 28 November 2007
Bias
This article seems to be unfairly slamming ZU, without any real reasoning as to why ZU was so "bad". It should at the least be rephrased to not outright say "ZU sucked".128.211.183.231 20:52, 27 November 2007 (EST)
- Jason owns both this wiki and ZU, and hasn't seen fit to make any changes or comment on the wording. If you want to reword it more neutrally, go ahead. --Adam 03:06, 28 November 2007 (EST)
- I haven't really read through the article to know there was bias. I just look at the screenshots. ;)... but, uh, I'll admit that this is a bit surprising. I knew some people had their opinions, but didn't imagine it would get suck in the article. If anybody wants to fix it they can, but I'm not going to bother. --Jase 08:47, 28 November 2007 (EST)