Community talk:Zelda Capital: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: What does it mean when the neutrality of the article is disputed, and how can I fix it?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What does it mean when the neutrality of the article is disputed, and how can I fix it? | What does it mean when the neutrality of the article is disputed, and how can I fix it? | ||
:The neutrality dispute deals mostly with point of view - It should never be first person (I, we, us, etc.). Also, a few sentences seem extraneous or lack qualification, ie. "Its most well known features...", "All in all though, this layout was revolutionary..." These tend to come off more like opinions than facts.<br>I'd just be concerned with eliminating the first person sentences for now, though. - [[User:Fury Three|F3]] | |||
Revision as of 03:33, 5 March 2008
What does it mean when the neutrality of the article is disputed, and how can I fix it?
- The neutrality dispute deals mostly with point of view - It should never be first person (I, we, us, etc.). Also, a few sentences seem extraneous or lack qualification, ie. "Its most well known features...", "All in all though, this layout was revolutionary..." These tend to come off more like opinions than facts.
I'd just be concerned with eliminating the first person sentences for now, though. - F3