retiredstaff
15,989
edits
Category talk:Countries: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
m
Text replace - 'GoldenChaos' to 'Jason'
m (Text replace - 'Adamcox82' to 'Adam') |
m (Text replace - 'GoldenChaos' to 'Jason') |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't really like this category. The nature of the various "lands" in the Zelda series is highly ambiguous, with regards to their status as kingdoms/countries/provinces/continents etc. I think this name makes too many assumptions, and the more general category Places serves the purpose much better. Maybe a nav template "lands in (Loz)" to be used on these pages would be better? Any thoughts? --[[User:Adam|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam|talk]])</sup> 13:11, 22 January 2008 (EST) | I don't really like this category. The nature of the various "lands" in the Zelda series is highly ambiguous, with regards to their status as kingdoms/countries/provinces/continents etc. I think this name makes too many assumptions, and the more general category Places serves the purpose much better. Maybe a nav template "lands in (Loz)" to be used on these pages would be better? Any thoughts? --[[User:Adam|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam|talk]])</sup> 13:11, 22 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:Better moved to something like "worlds," I think.--[[User: | :Better moved to something like "worlds," I think.--[[User:Jason|Jase]] 13:46, 22 January 2008 (EST) | ||
::"Lands" makes more sense to me. "Worlds" conveys more of a multi-planet sort of feel, at least to me it does. --[[User:Ando|Ando]] 13:54, 22 January 2008 (EST) | ::"Lands" makes more sense to me. "Worlds" conveys more of a multi-planet sort of feel, at least to me it does. --[[User:Ando|Ando]] 13:54, 22 January 2008 (EST) | ||
