autopatrol, curators, Interface administrators, Administrators
71,408
edits
Talk:Link/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
m
Text replacement - "[[User talk:Adam|" to "[[User talk:Adam1400|"
m (Text replacement - "[[User:Adam|" to "[[User:Adam660|") |
m (Text replacement - "[[User talk:Adam|" to "[[User talk:Adam1400|") |
||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
I think having a single main Link article is the best idea, but i also think and article for young link and toon link is a good idea because of their roles in Smash bros. {{nosig|Widkid85|07:12, 15 March 2008}} | I think having a single main Link article is the best idea, but i also think and article for young link and toon link is a good idea because of their roles in Smash bros. {{nosig|Widkid85|07:12, 15 March 2008}} | ||
:Surely much of this comes down to a discussion about the contents of [[:Category:Link]]? Personally I think that "[[Toon Link]]" should be a section within [[Link]], not it's own article. This form of Link has no notable differences from previous incarnations other than cosmetic changes, and as such can't be given the same level of focus as other individuals such as [[Young Link]]/[[Adult Link]], or the four [[Links]]. —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk: | :Surely much of this comes down to a discussion about the contents of [[:Category:Link]]? Personally I think that "[[Toon Link]]" should be a section within [[Link]], not it's own article. This form of Link has no notable differences from previous incarnations other than cosmetic changes, and as such can't be given the same level of focus as other individuals such as [[Young Link]]/[[Adult Link]], or the four [[Links]]. —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam1400|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 15 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
true--Zanramon :) 10:28, 15 March 2008 (EDT) | true--Zanramon :) 10:28, 15 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
[[User:Saibh|Saibh]] 15:09, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | [[User:Saibh|Saibh]] 15:09, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Relationships should be described all together in their own, self-contained section. Any other solution would be too chaotic and fragmentary. Alphabetical order would be a good idea. —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk: | :Relationships should be described all together in their own, self-contained section. Any other solution would be too chaotic and fragmentary. Alphabetical order would be a good idea. —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam1400|talk]])</sup> 18:13, 24 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:: Other ganondorfs? It had always been my experience that there was just one... Is this just a typo or is this assumption being thrown out the window for the wiki?--[[User:Magnus orion|Magnus orion]] 21:50, 27 March 2008 (EDT) | :: Other ganondorfs? It had always been my experience that there was just one... Is this just a typo or is this assumption being thrown out the window for the wiki?--[[User:Magnus orion|Magnus orion]] 21:50, 27 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::Sorry, I don't get your meaning? —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk: | :::Sorry, I don't get your meaning? —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam1400|talk]])</sup> 14:24, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Somewhere in the article it's stated that there's more than one Ganondorf, despite the fact that ''(if I've noticed correctly)'' the general consensus is that there's one constant Ganondorf. --[[User:Ando1400|Ando]] <small>''([[User talk:Ando|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Ando|C]])''</small> 14:46, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | :Somewhere in the article it's stated that there's more than one Ganondorf, despite the fact that ''(if I've noticed correctly)'' the general consensus is that there's one constant Ganondorf. --[[User:Ando1400|Ando]] <small>''([[User talk:Ando|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Ando|C]])''</small> 14:46, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
::Ok, I hadn't noticed that but if it's there it does need to be removed/rewritten. While both Link and Zelda can be argued to have had multiple separate incarnations, Ganon(dorf) is a single individual. —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk: | ::Ok, I hadn't noticed that but if it's there it does need to be removed/rewritten. While both Link and Zelda can be argued to have had multiple separate incarnations, Ganon(dorf) is a single individual. —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam1400|talk]])</sup> 16:13, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
== WW age == | == WW age == | ||
