autopatrol, curators, Interface administrators, Administrators
71,408
edits
Talk:Link/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
m
Text replacement - "{{nosig" to "{{Nosig"
m (Text replacement - "{{nosig" to "{{Nosig") |
|||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
== Reply to previous comment == | == Reply to previous comment == | ||
But in the game & the book if you flick through and look around AND on the internet or on any trusted zelda info source, It CLEARLY states that The hero of winds isn't a descendant of Link from OoT!!!{{ | But in the game & the book if you flick through and look around AND on the internet or on any trusted zelda info source, It CLEARLY states that The hero of winds isn't a descendant of Link from OoT!!!{{Nosig|195.93.21.37|15:55, 20 May 2007}} | ||
aaaand if you play the game I beleive he is the main character...his name is link...he uses the master sword and has the triforce of courage.....he is link..no arguments besides later didnt king hyrule say he has the bloodline of link since he got the triforce on his hand or something {{ | aaaand if you play the game I beleive he is the main character...his name is link...he uses the master sword and has the triforce of courage.....he is link..no arguments besides later didnt king hyrule say he has the bloodline of link since he got the triforce on his hand or something {{Nosig|Remus Lupo|11:02, 14 April 2008}} | ||
== Link is mute? == | == Link is mute? == | ||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
== link, link and link == | == link, link and link == | ||
It seems that it is a lot of talking about link "hero of time", link " hero of winds" and link "hero of light". Some want to have separate pages for these characters and others like it as it is. Can't we have it as it is, the link page stays as it is, but we can still have separate pages for the three main links. That is how I would like it. Anybody agree with me? {{ | It seems that it is a lot of talking about link "hero of time", link " hero of winds" and link "hero of light". Some want to have separate pages for these characters and others like it as it is. Can't we have it as it is, the link page stays as it is, but we can still have separate pages for the three main links. That is how I would like it. Anybody agree with me? {{Nosig|81.229.73.179|13:28, 8 December 2007}} | ||
What does three "main" Links mean? How are the other Links inferior those three? Oh yeah, because they didn't appear in 3D games. I'm not fond of 3D fanboyism, so I have to disagree. Link is Link, no matter what incarnation. It doesn't make sense to make specific articles for a few of his incarnations, but keep the rest in one article. And it makes no sense either to give each Link his own page, because that would then also be required for all other multiple-appearance characters (to keep unity in zeldawiki). [[User:IfIHaveTo|IfIHaveTo]] 03:55, 9 December 2007 (EST) | What does three "main" Links mean? How are the other Links inferior those three? Oh yeah, because they didn't appear in 3D games. I'm not fond of 3D fanboyism, so I have to disagree. Link is Link, no matter what incarnation. It doesn't make sense to make specific articles for a few of his incarnations, but keep the rest in one article. And it makes no sense either to give each Link his own page, because that would then also be required for all other multiple-appearance characters (to keep unity in zeldawiki). [[User:IfIHaveTo|IfIHaveTo]] 03:55, 9 December 2007 (EST) | ||
I think having a single main Link article is the best idea, but i also think and article for young link and toon link is a good idea because of their roles in Smash bros. {{ | I think having a single main Link article is the best idea, but i also think and article for young link and toon link is a good idea because of their roles in Smash bros. {{Nosig|Widkid85|07:12, 15 March 2008}} | ||
:Surely much of this comes down to a discussion about the contents of [[:Category:Link]]? Personally I think that "[[Toon Link]]" should be a section within [[Link]], not it's own article. This form of Link has no notable differences from previous incarnations other than cosmetic changes, and as such can't be given the same level of focus as other individuals such as [[Young Link]]/[[Adult Link]], or the four [[Links]]. —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam1400|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 15 March 2008 (EDT) | :Surely much of this comes down to a discussion about the contents of [[:Category:Link]]? Personally I think that "[[Toon Link]]" should be a section within [[Link]], not it's own article. This form of Link has no notable differences from previous incarnations other than cosmetic changes, and as such can't be given the same level of focus as other individuals such as [[Young Link]]/[[Adult Link]], or the four [[Links]]. —[[User:Adam660|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam1400|talk]])</sup> 05:13, 15 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
true--Zanramon :) 10:28, 15 March 2008 (EDT) | true--Zanramon :) 10:28, 15 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
I think when someone says three main links its because its the main three to base most timelines off of...because miyamoto stated that tp and ww are parallel and both happen after ocarina...also because the are the only three with a human form of ganon...they just seem needed for the rest of the links to fit together at least easier{{ | I think when someone says three main links its because its the main three to base most timelines off of...because miyamoto stated that tp and ww are parallel and both happen after ocarina...also because the are the only three with a human form of ganon...they just seem needed for the rest of the links to fit together at least easier{{Nosig|Remus Lupo|08:31, 15 April 2008}} | ||
