Talk:Bad Uncle Rupee's Ashen Rupeeland: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 September 2009 by Alter in topic Needed?
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Needed?)
 
(→‎Needed?: Mass Signature Updates - Round 2)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


Er, does this really need its own article? It is only briefly seen in a cut scene, and there isn't much more to say about it. In my opinion, it should be merged with [[Rupeeland]]. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 16:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Er, does this really need its own article? It is only briefly seen in a cut scene, and there isn't much more to say about it. In my opinion, it should be merged with [[Rupeeland]]. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 16:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
:I plan to add more to it when I have the time. I think it's needed, especially if compared to other articles which have been kept. Right now, we need to boost our page count. Besides, I think it's something that people will enjoy! :) {{:User:Alter/sig}} 18:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
::It's not a good idea to justify articles by comparing them to worser ones :S But yeah, we've been told to halt merging for a bit and focus on other things. This doesn't alter my philosophy of leaner wikis being better than bloated ones. But since recent merges have tanked the article count, consensus says to aim for other targets for awhile. I disagree with this but will comply and still mark articles to be merged, just won't be actually merging any until I find out what sort of Article Quota must be maintained. In my opinion I think the Stats Page should focus on Featured Content thusly putting Quality first. The way to do this would be to number our Featured Articles at the top and the total articles below that. {{:User:Axiomist1875@legacy41958496/sig}} 23:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
:::I completely agree with you there. Still, I think this page should stay. Just my opinion.  I wouldn't have created it if I thought it wasn't worthy of mention. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 00:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
==Trash==
Pointless article is pointless. Can we please just get rid of this, now?{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 15:37, 1 June 2011 (EDT)
:Just a little redundant, there, Justin? But I agree. At most the subject this article deserves mention on the [[Rupeeland]] page, which is bad enough itself. This whole TRR mess is gonna have to be cleaned up at some point... The trick is finding someone who cares enough :/ {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 16:53, 2 June 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 05:54, 9 December 2021

Needed?

Er, does this really need its own article? It is only briefly seen in a cut scene, and there isn't much more to say about it. In my opinion, it should be merged with Rupeeland. --Grandy02 16:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I plan to add more to it when I have the time. I think it's needed, especially if compared to other articles which have been kept. Right now, we need to boost our page count. Besides, I think it's something that people will enjoy! :) Alter  {T C B H } 18:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not a good idea to justify articles by comparing them to worser ones :S But yeah, we've been told to halt merging for a bit and focus on other things. This doesn't alter my philosophy of leaner wikis being better than bloated ones. But since recent merges have tanked the article count, consensus says to aim for other targets for awhile. I disagree with this but will comply and still mark articles to be merged, just won't be actually merging any until I find out what sort of Article Quota must be maintained. In my opinion I think the Stats Page should focus on Featured Content thusly putting Quality first. The way to do this would be to number our Featured Articles at the top and the total articles below that. Axiomist (talk) 23:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I completely agree with you there. Still, I think this page should stay. Just my opinion. I wouldn't have created it if I thought it wasn't worthy of mention. Alter  {T C B H } 00:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Trash

Pointless article is pointless. Can we please just get rid of this, now?User:Justin ZW/sig 15:37, 1 June 2011 (EDT)

Just a little redundant, there, Justin? But I agree. At most the subject this article deserves mention on the Rupeeland page, which is bad enough itself. This whole TRR mess is gonna have to be cleaned up at some point... The trick is finding someone who cares enough :/ — Hylian King [*] 16:53, 2 June 2011 (EDT)