Talk:Hole of "L": Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Latest comment: 29 March 2022 by Ceiling Master
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Why can't this just be a redirect to the Kokiri Training Center page? It's ''literally'' just a hole.~~~~")
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why can't this just be a redirect to the Kokiri Training Center page? It's ''literally'' just a hole.{{SUBST:KrytenKoroSig}} 17:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Why can't this just be a redirect to the Kokiri Training Center page? It's ''literally'' just a hole.{{SUBST:KrytenKoroSig}} 17:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
:It’s a different Term. Though small, (and a hole), it’s still a unique, named location and I feel it should be documented separately, per Terminology policy.    {{:User:JumbledLimes/sig}} 18:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
::Oh, then I've got to say I strongly disagree with that policy. As you can see from looking at this page, it results in a tiny page with barely any information that it took ''digging'' for me to figure out what the hell it was even talking about. Nothing on the page even mentions the Kokiri Training Center, I had to look at "what links here" to even get a hint about what the bloody hell this article was supposed to be about. I absolutely agree with having a mechanical target for all official terms, but requiring a separate ''article'', from what I can see, damages the usability of this project.{{SUBST:KrytenKoroSig}} 16:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
:::Well, it's still a stub right now, but the "Features and Overview" section will eventually mention the Kokiri Training Center to make it more obvious what the page is. We often create pages as empty frameworks and tag them with appropriate stub templates to be expanded upon later, so that we can go ahead and store terms and get things documented.
:::As for the issue of the policy itself, that's sort of just how the cookie crumbles. The way I see it, we're striving to document everything we can about the franchise, and sometimes that will result in stubby articles where there isn't a whole lot to be said. {{User:Ceiling Master/sig}} 16:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:39, 29 March 2022

Why can't this just be a redirect to the Kokiri Training Center page? It's literally just a hole.{{SUBST:KrytenKoroSig}} 17:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

It’s a different Term. Though small, (and a hole), it’s still a unique, named location and I feel it should be documented separately, per Terminology policy. – JumbledLimes (talk/contribs) 18:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, then I've got to say I strongly disagree with that policy. As you can see from looking at this page, it results in a tiny page with barely any information that it took digging for me to figure out what the hell it was even talking about. Nothing on the page even mentions the Kokiri Training Center, I had to look at "what links here" to even get a hint about what the bloody hell this article was supposed to be about. I absolutely agree with having a mechanical target for all official terms, but requiring a separate article, from what I can see, damages the usability of this project.{{SUBST:KrytenKoroSig}} 16:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Well, it's still a stub right now, but the "Features and Overview" section will eventually mention the Kokiri Training Center to make it more obvious what the page is. We often create pages as empty frameworks and tag them with appropriate stub templates to be expanded upon later, so that we can go ahead and store terms and get things documented.
As for the issue of the policy itself, that's sort of just how the cookie crumbles. The way I see it, we're striving to document everything we can about the franchise, and sometimes that will result in stubby articles where there isn't a whole lot to be said. – Ceiling Master (talk · contributions) 16:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]