Anonymous

User talk:Ixbran: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
(→‎Code of Conduct: new section)
Line 102: Line 102:


When i posted the element for Tingle, people provided pictur based evidence that showed his attacks generating light blue elemental attack effects, usually associated by water. So it seemed obvious, but when it was revealed it was fire, as shown by his focus spirit in the trailer, I was actually going to change it my self but someone already had. I wasn't aware there had been an edit war regarding his element, so don't sit there and act like i did it on purpose.<br><br>And for the record, these 'arguments' weve been having, are all your fault. your the one always approaching me, accusing me of being incorrect or wrong, or going in and changing my edits without consulting me or any of the admins. You come off as a jerk who feels like he can go in and change things how ever you want simply if you don't agree with it. And this trying to come off as the 'bigger guy' by trying to push the blame on me makes you come off as REALLY passive aggressive and manipulative.<br><br>Your behavior is exactly like my moms, acting all high and mighty and acting like your always in the right, even when your not. And then the second someone calls you out on your BS, you suddenly play the victim and all of a sudden everyone is out to get you. I deal with this kind of manipulative BS on a daily basis, so don't think you can just sit there and expect me to fall for every little trick in the book.<br><br>And yes, I would much prefer it if an admin came in and delt with this, maybe then I can stop worrying about you bothering me so I can get some work done.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 02:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
When i posted the element for Tingle, people provided pictur based evidence that showed his attacks generating light blue elemental attack effects, usually associated by water. So it seemed obvious, but when it was revealed it was fire, as shown by his focus spirit in the trailer, I was actually going to change it my self but someone already had. I wasn't aware there had been an edit war regarding his element, so don't sit there and act like i did it on purpose.<br><br>And for the record, these 'arguments' weve been having, are all your fault. your the one always approaching me, accusing me of being incorrect or wrong, or going in and changing my edits without consulting me or any of the admins. You come off as a jerk who feels like he can go in and change things how ever you want simply if you don't agree with it. And this trying to come off as the 'bigger guy' by trying to push the blame on me makes you come off as REALLY passive aggressive and manipulative.<br><br>Your behavior is exactly like my moms, acting all high and mighty and acting like your always in the right, even when your not. And then the second someone calls you out on your BS, you suddenly play the victim and all of a sudden everyone is out to get you. I deal with this kind of manipulative BS on a daily basis, so don't think you can just sit there and expect me to fall for every little trick in the book.<br><br>And yes, I would much prefer it if an admin came in and delt with this, maybe then I can stop worrying about you bothering me so I can get some work done.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 02:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
:I'm not saying you caused the edit war on purpose, I'm saying that by editing before waiting for proper evidence, your actions led to an edit war, full stop. That's really not a controversial claim -- you posted a claim that turned out to be false, and an edit war happened over it. I'm not trying to criticize you, I'm trying to point out the consequences of not following the guidelines. Full disclosure -- I've had the same thing happen to me, and on this wiki, years ago. I learned the lesson of waiting for evidence. I'm not saying (and I never ''have'') "you're a bad person", I'm saying "this is why we have these rules".
:As far as "going in and changing your edits", (1) that's what wikis do, (2) dude, ''you'' went into my sandbox and started a fight about the Impa costume. ''My'' sandbox. I responded, politely, stating why I disagreed about the basis for the costume, and you proceeded to quite rudely mock me, as seen above. And even then, ''I've left the actual costumes page with the version you wanted'' -- I've '''not''' edit warred with you about it. Same thing with the elements -- I've stated my disagreement, and tried to constructively discuss why there's a problem with the edit, but I '''have not fought with you over the edit'''. Contrast that with your behavior on the Costumes page, where I cited disagreement with putting the maps up, and you replaced them and said I had to deal with it.
:Dude, in this section alone you've called me a jerk, liar, harasser, stalker, manipulative, "high and mighty", "acting like I'm always right", fake victim, and passive aggressive. I've not criticized your ''behavior'' in any way except to call it "unreasonably defensive", and I've actually ''complimented you'' on your edits in the past, for chrissakes, and like I said, ''I defended your Tingle element edit at the time'', because I had faith in you. You can see that, right? Please have some introspection on what you've said above, because ''I am not trying to start a fight, I'm trying to edit the wiki''. Can we ''please'' just agree to be polite to each other and get back to the topic of the article?[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 17:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


== Costume maps ==
== Costume maps ==
2,645

edits