Anonymous

User talk:Dermotmacflann: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Line 26: Line 26:


Oh, thank you! See, this is what I've been asking for forever now, and no one apparently knows of its existence except you. Haha. It's be nice if this was easier to find... Anyway, about the lexical sets... They seem like a very nice idea, however, I'm not sure how accurate they are. For example, <small>CLOTH</small> and <small>THOUGHT</small> (as well as 'taut' and 'hawk') are said to be pronounced with the O as /ɔ/ in GenAm, but most Americans would pronounce it with /ɑ/. I think maybe a few places like New York City and Philadelphia might pronounce them that way. I know they seem to pronounce the word 'on' as /ɔn/ instead of /ɑn/ like the majority of the US. So altho you say "it's fairly clear what I mean no matter our individual accents", it's really NOT to most people (325 million in the US versus 62 million in the UK). Most English speakers who see "AW" are going to think it's pronounced /ɑː/, not /ɔː/. Now, that might not be a problem sometimes (so long as they don't know IPA), it can cause problems with words like origin, which -according to the lexical set list on Wikipedia- says 'origin' is pronounced the same way as 'cough' and 'long'. But that's not the case at all. You could write 'cawf' and 'lawng' and the pronunciation wouldn't change, but 'awrigin' wouldn't work since most people in the US say 'origin' with an OR (ɔr) sound as apposed to an AW (ɑ) sound. [[User:Schwarzorn|Schwarzorn]] ([[User talk:Schwarzorn|talk]]) 23:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Oh, thank you! See, this is what I've been asking for forever now, and no one apparently knows of its existence except you. Haha. It's be nice if this was easier to find... Anyway, about the lexical sets... They seem like a very nice idea, however, I'm not sure how accurate they are. For example, <small>CLOTH</small> and <small>THOUGHT</small> (as well as 'taut' and 'hawk') are said to be pronounced with the O as /ɔ/ in GenAm, but most Americans would pronounce it with /ɑ/. I think maybe a few places like New York City and Philadelphia might pronounce them that way. I know they seem to pronounce the word 'on' as /ɔn/ instead of /ɑn/ like the majority of the US. So altho you say "it's fairly clear what I mean no matter our individual accents", it's really NOT to most people (325 million in the US versus 62 million in the UK). Most English speakers who see "AW" are going to think it's pronounced /ɑː/, not /ɔː/. Now, that might not be a problem sometimes (so long as they don't know IPA), it can cause problems with words like origin, which -according to the lexical set list on Wikipedia- says 'origin' is pronounced the same way as 'cough' and 'long'. But that's not the case at all. You could write 'cawf' and 'lawng' and the pronunciation wouldn't change, but 'awrigin' wouldn't work since most people in the US say 'origin' with an OR (ɔr) sound as apposed to an AW (ɑ) sound. [[User:Schwarzorn|Schwarzorn]] ([[User talk:Schwarzorn|talk]]) 23:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
:Lexical sets are a general rule of thumb, and there are exceptions, including words like "on"&mdash;I think some accents that pronounce it with a <small>CLOTH</small> vowel may be influenced by its pairing with "off," which is unambiguously a <small>CLOTH</small> word.  As for the four-way merger of <small>PALM-LOT-CLOTH-THOUGHT</small> vowels in parts of the United States, this is mostly found in the central and western parts of the country, and is furthered by the media and entertainment influence of Los Angeles where the merger predominates.  Most of Canada also has that four-way merger.  But most of the eastern U.S. maintains the <small>LOT-CLOTH</small> distinction, merging <small>LOT</small> with <small>PALM</small> but merging <small>CLOTH</small> with <small>THOUGHT</small>.  One exception is eastern New England (including Boston), which merges in a different direction&mdash;<small>LOT-CLOTH</small> are merged there as they are in the western U.S., they don't necessarily merge with <small>PALM</small> ''or'' <small>THOUGHT</small> (except in places like Boston itself, where <small>LOT-CLOTH-THOUGHT</small> merge but are distinct from <small>PALM</small>).  Then there's informal lexical sets I'll just call <small>"SORRY"</small> and <small>"ORANGE"</small>, which varyingly have the same vowel as <small>START</small> or <small>NORTH</small> depending on North American dialect.  So, summary:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Lexical Set
! <small>PALM</small>
! <small>LOT</small>
! <small>CLOTH</small>
! <small>THOUGHT</small>
! <small>START</small>
! <small>SORRY</small>
! <small>ORANGE</small>
! <small>NORTH</small>
! <small>FORCE</small>
! <small>CURE</small>
|-
! Central Canada
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ʊɹ
|-
! Western U.S.
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑɹ
| class="IPA" | ɑɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ʊɹ
|-
! Eastern U.S.
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɑ
| class="IPA" | ɔ
| class="IPA" | ɔ
| class="IPA" | ɑɹ
| class="IPA" | ɑɹ
| class="IPA" | ɑɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ʊɹ
|-
! Eastern New England
| class="IPA" | ɑː
| class="IPA" | ɒː
| class="IPA" | ɒː
| class="IPA" | ɔː
| class="IPA" | ɑː(ɹ)
| class="IPA" | ɒː(ɹ)
| class="IPA" | ɒː(ɹ)
| class="IPA" | ɔː(ɹ)
| class="IPA" | ɔə(ɹ)
| class="IPA" | ʊə(ɹ)
|-
! Southern England
| class="IPA" | ɑː
| class="IPA" | ɔ
| class="IPA" | ɔ
| class="IPA" | oː
| class="IPA" | ɑː
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | ɔɹ
| class="IPA" | oː
| class="IPA" | oː
| class="IPA" | oː
|}
- [[User:Dermotmacflann|Dermotmacflann]] ([[User talk:Dermotmacflann|talk]]) 03:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


== Source Info on Image Uploads ==
== Source Info on Image Uploads ==
193

edits