User talk:Cipriano/archive3: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
m
Text replacement - "{{:User:Cipriano/sig}}" to "{{:User:Cipriano555/sig}}"
TriforceTony (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "''Twilight Princess''" to "{{TP}}") |
m (Text replacement - "{{:User:Cipriano/sig}}" to "{{:User:Cipriano555/sig}}") |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Sorry for bothering you again, but I have one more question. I'm interested to write a WikiExclusive article (perhaps two, although I hate to be too ambitious), but what do I need to know before preparing one (for example, what are the basic rules?) Thanks in advance. =) --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 16:41, 10 December 2010 (EST) | Sorry for bothering you again, but I have one more question. I'm interested to write a WikiExclusive article (perhaps two, although I hate to be too ambitious), but what do I need to know before preparing one (for example, what are the basic rules?) Thanks in advance. =) --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 16:41, 10 December 2010 (EST) | ||
:You never bother me! Don't worry :) The staff has written an informal/formal guideline for writing and submitting WikiExclusives in the Help Guide [[Help:WikiExclusives|here]]. And please write as many as you want, there is no cap! We'd love to have your work on the wiki in a unique form, to go along with the stellar mainspace contributions you provide on the daily. {{:User: | :You never bother me! Don't worry :) The staff has written an informal/formal guideline for writing and submitting WikiExclusives in the Help Guide [[Help:WikiExclusives|here]]. And please write as many as you want, there is no cap! We'd love to have your work on the wiki in a unique form, to go along with the stellar mainspace contributions you provide on the daily. {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 22:35, 10 December 2010 (EST) | ||
I just finished one as well....But I wrote it before I read the rules, and it's on a subpage of my userpage. Could you read it and judge it and delete the link afterwards so vandals can't find it? Thanks. | I just finished one as well....But I wrote it before I read the rules, and it's on a subpage of my userpage. Could you read it and judge it and delete the link afterwards so vandals can't find it? Thanks. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
--[[User:Purlo's Grandfather|Purlo's Grandfather]] 18:57, 23 December 2010 (EST) | --[[User:Purlo's Grandfather|Purlo's Grandfather]] 18:57, 23 December 2010 (EST) | ||
::Sure I can! I'll leave the comment for it in your talk window, so that you can see it and not have it deleted with the WikiExclusive. I'm excited you guys are cranking these out! {{:User: | ::Sure I can! I'll leave the comment for it in your talk window, so that you can see it and not have it deleted with the WikiExclusive. I'm excited you guys are cranking these out! {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 19:03, 23 December 2010 (EST) | ||
I made some tweaks to it, such as lengthening the conclusion, making the questions and answers into an introduction and thesis, and fixing the test-effect. I hope you like it now, but if there's anything wrong, feel free to tell me and I will fix it. | I made some tweaks to it, such as lengthening the conclusion, making the questions and answers into an introduction and thesis, and fixing the test-effect. I hope you like it now, but if there's anything wrong, feel free to tell me and I will fix it. | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
--{{HylianTP|P}}{{HylianTP|U}}{{HylianTP|R}}{{HylianTP|L}}{{HylianTP|O}}{{HylianTP|S}} {{HylianTP|G}}{{HylianTP|R}}{{HylianTP|A}}{{HylianTP|N}}{{HylianTP|D}}{{HylianTP|F}}{{HylianTP|A}}{{HylianTP|T}}{{HylianTP|H}}{{HylianTP|E}}{{HylianTP|R}} 13:15, 31 December 2010 (EST) | --{{HylianTP|P}}{{HylianTP|U}}{{HylianTP|R}}{{HylianTP|L}}{{HylianTP|O}}{{HylianTP|S}} {{HylianTP|G}}{{HylianTP|R}}{{HylianTP|A}}{{HylianTP|N}}{{HylianTP|D}}{{HylianTP|F}}{{HylianTP|A}}{{HylianTP|T}}{{HylianTP|H}}{{HylianTP|E}}{{HylianTP|R}} 13:15, 31 December 2010 (EST) | ||
::Yes, I submitted it days ago. It sometimes takes awhile for the staff to review it because they all have different commitments on and offline, but rest assured, it has been submitted and feedback will be given soon! {{:User: | ::Yes, I submitted it days ago. It sometimes takes awhile for the staff to review it because they all have different commitments on and offline, but rest assured, it has been submitted and feedback will be given soon! {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 14:04, 1 January 2011 (EST) | ||
Whew, for a second I thought everyone but me on this site was gone! | Whew, for a second I thought everyone but me on this site was gone! | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Hey Cip. It has been a while, hope you've had a good Christmas and upcoming new year. Just dropping you a message to find out what's happening with your two drafted ZI articles on astronomy and the goddesses that have been sitting around for over 8 months. If you want to release them at ZI, let me know and we can schedule them in, or if you want them back to release as Wiki exclusives, or whatever you want done with them. Otherwise I'll just move them to the archives, as there's no use in having them just sitting around unpublished. :) {{:User:Melchizedek/sig}} 16:21, 28 December 2010 (EST) | Hey Cip. It has been a while, hope you've had a good Christmas and upcoming new year. Just dropping you a message to find out what's happening with your two drafted ZI articles on astronomy and the goddesses that have been sitting around for over 8 months. If you want to release them at ZI, let me know and we can schedule them in, or if you want them back to release as Wiki exclusives, or whatever you want done with them. Otherwise I'll just move them to the archives, as there's no use in having them just sitting around unpublished. :) {{:User:Melchizedek/sig}} 16:21, 28 December 2010 (EST) | ||
:Hmm, good point, I almost totally forgot about them. I wonder if some other editor would like to finish them (if someone expresses interest, then by all means)? Otherwise, ya might as well move them to the archives (I have copies of them on my personal computer). I'd like to continue writing them, but the inspiration just isn't there anymore! Thanks, dude. And yea, the holidays were great, thanks! I trust yours went well? :) {{:User: | :Hmm, good point, I almost totally forgot about them. I wonder if some other editor would like to finish them (if someone expresses interest, then by all means)? Otherwise, ya might as well move them to the archives (I have copies of them on my personal computer). I'd like to continue writing them, but the inspiration just isn't there anymore! Thanks, dude. And yea, the holidays were great, thanks! I trust yours went well? :) {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 18:19, 28 December 2010 (EST) | ||
::Yep, I had a great Christmas. Okay, no problem - what I'll do is move them into the archives, so that if one day the inspiration to finish them returns, they're still available. They just won't be sitting around in our boards waiting for release. :) {{:User:Melchizedek/sig}} 18:59, 28 December 2010 (EST) | ::Yep, I had a great Christmas. Okay, no problem - what I'll do is move them into the archives, so that if one day the inspiration to finish them returns, they're still available. They just won't be sitting around in our boards waiting for release. :) {{:User:Melchizedek/sig}} 18:59, 28 December 2010 (EST) | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:::2)The quality of the writing is a bit unclear in parts. For example, when talking about a "submerged section" of the Temple of Time, it becomes a bit confusing as to what you are actually referring to/talking about. Elaborate more and be a bit more concise/focused in your argument. | :::2)The quality of the writing is a bit unclear in parts. For example, when talking about a "submerged section" of the Temple of Time, it becomes a bit confusing as to what you are actually referring to/talking about. Elaborate more and be a bit more concise/focused in your argument. | ||
::Other than that, the rest of the comments praised the presentation and development of the theory. You're close, there are mainly minor fixes that need to be made before this can be published under ZW standards. You are allowed to revise and submit the article as much as you like. :) {{:User: | ::Other than that, the rest of the comments praised the presentation and development of the theory. You're close, there are mainly minor fixes that need to be made before this can be published under ZW standards. You are allowed to revise and submit the article as much as you like. :) {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 17:59, 17 January 2011 (EST) | ||
I hope everything is in tip-top shape now, resubmit it please. | I hope everything is in tip-top shape now, resubmit it please. | ||
--{{HylianTP|P}}{{HylianTP|U}}{{HylianTP|R}}{{HylianTP|L}}{{HylianTP|O}}{{HylianTP|S}} {{HylianTP|G}}{{HylianTP|R}}{{HylianTP|A}}{{HylianTP|N}}{{HylianTP|D}}{{HylianTP|F}}{{HylianTP|A}}{{HylianTP|T}}{{HylianTP|H}}{{HylianTP|E}}{{HylianTP|R}} 19:18, 17 January 2011 (EST) | --{{HylianTP|P}}{{HylianTP|U}}{{HylianTP|R}}{{HylianTP|L}}{{HylianTP|O}}{{HylianTP|S}} {{HylianTP|G}}{{HylianTP|R}}{{HylianTP|A}}{{HylianTP|N}}{{HylianTP|D}}{{HylianTP|F}}{{HylianTP|A}}{{HylianTP|T}}{{HylianTP|H}}{{HylianTP|E}}{{HylianTP|R}} 19:18, 17 January 2011 (EST) | ||
:::I'm afraid the comments will be similar. After another read through, there are still many "ToT", "OoT", and "TP" abbreviations, and there are still a few informal parentheses remarks, i.e. "(I believe)". It's a great piece, don't get me wrong, I'm just afraid that without fully changing these things, the commentary will be identical to your first submission. {{:User: | :::I'm afraid the comments will be similar. After another read through, there are still many "ToT", "OoT", and "TP" abbreviations, and there are still a few informal parentheses remarks, i.e. "(I believe)". It's a great piece, don't get me wrong, I'm just afraid that without fully changing these things, the commentary will be identical to your first submission. {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 23:26, 27 January 2011 (EST) | ||
==Affiliation== | ==Affiliation== | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
This affiliation is final right? Just wanted to make sure there wasn't any changes of the sort. [[User:Skermefaten|Skermefaten]] 23:02, 16 January 2011 (EST) | This affiliation is final right? Just wanted to make sure there wasn't any changes of the sort. [[User:Skermefaten|Skermefaten]] 23:02, 16 January 2011 (EST) | ||
:Yes, the affilation is final! Thanks! Hope you're enjoying editing your Community page! {{:User: | :Yes, the affilation is final! Thanks! Hope you're enjoying editing your Community page! {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 01:00, 25 February 2011 (EST) | ||
== It's ready at last == | == It's ready at last == | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
Hey. I'm a new user to Zelda Wiki, but I've been using it for a long while. I am a big Zelda fan and I think I know a lot about the secrets and mysteries of many Zelda games. I decided to start a new blog at www.zeldafacts.blogspot.com so that users can follow and subscribe to me. We share knowledge of Zelda and give theories and opinions. I'd really appreciate if you inform everybody about my blog, because I want to meet new fans. I would also really like it if you follow my blog. Thanks a lot! | Hey. I'm a new user to Zelda Wiki, but I've been using it for a long while. I am a big Zelda fan and I think I know a lot about the secrets and mysteries of many Zelda games. I decided to start a new blog at www.zeldafacts.blogspot.com so that users can follow and subscribe to me. We share knowledge of Zelda and give theories and opinions. I'd really appreciate if you inform everybody about my blog, because I want to meet new fans. I would also really like it if you follow my blog. Thanks a lot! | ||
:Sounds great to me! However, because Zelda Wiki is a wiki and not an ad service, we cannot advertise your blog on the site. ''Zelda'' fansites, such as [[Community:ZeldaInformer|ZeldaInformer]] and [[Community:Zelda Eternity|Zelda Eternity]], and multimedia sites, such as [[Community:World Zelda Music Radio|World Zelda Music Radio]], have the opportunity to affiliate with the wiki, due to their large community following, extensive content, and wiki participation, however, because your site is a personal blog, this avenue is unavailable as well. :( Sorry about that! To echo [[User:Mandi|Mandi]], the best place for this kind of promotion is in the community's forums! A great place to start is the "The Masterminds" toolbar at the left beneath the wiki's logo; all of these sites have highly active forums where I'm sure you'll be able to garner a following for your blog! I wish you best of luck with the site, and I hope you continue to use ZW as a ''Zelda'' resource! Hope to see you around the wiki :) {{:User: | :Sounds great to me! However, because Zelda Wiki is a wiki and not an ad service, we cannot advertise your blog on the site. ''Zelda'' fansites, such as [[Community:ZeldaInformer|ZeldaInformer]] and [[Community:Zelda Eternity|Zelda Eternity]], and multimedia sites, such as [[Community:World Zelda Music Radio|World Zelda Music Radio]], have the opportunity to affiliate with the wiki, due to their large community following, extensive content, and wiki participation, however, because your site is a personal blog, this avenue is unavailable as well. :( Sorry about that! To echo [[User:Mandi|Mandi]], the best place for this kind of promotion is in the community's forums! A great place to start is the "The Masterminds" toolbar at the left beneath the wiki's logo; all of these sites have highly active forums where I'm sure you'll be able to garner a following for your blog! I wish you best of luck with the site, and I hope you continue to use ZW as a ''Zelda'' resource! Hope to see you around the wiki :) {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 22:13, 21 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
== Sorry == | == Sorry == | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
:Never mind that. This time I'll ask you something different. Can you please downgrade my user rights rank? --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 02:42, 30 April 2011 (EDT) | :Never mind that. This time I'll ask you something different. Can you please downgrade my user rights rank? --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 02:42, 30 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
:It's not that I want that, but Dany is somewhat pissed off with me due to a minor mistake I made into an article due to not using linking shortcuts (I never used them anyway, I always pipe-linked the long way to game articles and them I accidentally made one mistake). Without the rank, no one else will go disproportionately berserk when a detail goes wrong. --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 04:26, 30 April 2011 (EDT) | :It's not that I want that, but Dany is somewhat pissed off with me due to a minor mistake I made into an article due to not using linking shortcuts (I never used them anyway, I always pipe-linked the long way to game articles and them I accidentally made one mistake). Without the rank, no one else will go disproportionately berserk when a detail goes wrong. --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 04:26, 30 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
::She really went crazy? That's not the Dany we all know... there's no way she's serious. Over one small mistake? No way, she's an admin and even she makes mistakes! K2L, we made you autopatrol because we trust in your editing skill - but of course we even expect autopatrol to make mistakes (albeit close to none, or at least catch them quickly after they are submitted). You're a great addition to the wiki, and I really think that this is preposterous! {{:User: | ::She really went crazy? That's not the Dany we all know... there's no way she's serious. Over one small mistake? No way, she's an admin and even she makes mistakes! K2L, we made you autopatrol because we trust in your editing skill - but of course we even expect autopatrol to make mistakes (albeit close to none, or at least catch them quickly after they are submitted). You're a great addition to the wiki, and I really think that this is preposterous! {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 12:20, 1 May 2011 (EDT) EDIT: Apparently, she was kidding! Don't worry about it :) {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 12:20, 1 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::Bahahaha! Aw c'mon, whenever I go crazy over small details like that, I thought everyone knew that I'm just kidding around! There's no way I was serious, K2L. Relax! ;) You're a wonderful addition to the wiki and there's nooooo way we'd demote you over something so silly. [[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 12:34, 1 May 2011 (EDT) | :::Bahahaha! Aw c'mon, whenever I go crazy over small details like that, I thought everyone knew that I'm just kidding around! There's no way I was serious, K2L. Relax! ;) You're a wonderful addition to the wiki and there's nooooo way we'd demote you over something so silly. [[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 12:34, 1 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
I appreciate your trust, pals =,(. It was indeed a minor mistake the one that I dropped. It was while I was editing a page that needed an urgent overhaul, because it was written by a newcomer and Ganondorfdude11 was already proposing its deletion. I usually don't rush to this extent an edit, because I know what happens when otherwise. Dany was perhaps just shocked after realizing that I never used shortcuts when linking to a game article. Anyway, I apologize for all the drama; I guess I forgot that this wiki luckily lacks the devilish Wikipedia paranoia syndrome. BTW, when you have time, can you read the linked sandbox page? It has been ready since a few days ago. --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 12:37, 1 May 2011 (EDT) | I appreciate your trust, pals =,(. It was indeed a minor mistake the one that I dropped. It was while I was editing a page that needed an urgent overhaul, because it was written by a newcomer and Ganondorfdude11 was already proposing its deletion. I usually don't rush to this extent an edit, because I know what happens when otherwise. Dany was perhaps just shocked after realizing that I never used shortcuts when linking to a game article. Anyway, I apologize for all the drama; I guess I forgot that this wiki luckily lacks the devilish Wikipedia paranoia syndrome. BTW, when you have time, can you read the linked sandbox page? It has been ready since a few days ago. --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 12:37, 1 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::Way ahead of you, K2L! The WikiExclusive's already been read and submitted! We're just waiting on staff commentary now... :) {{:User: | ::::Way ahead of you, K2L! The WikiExclusive's already been read and submitted! We're just waiting on staff commentary now... :) {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 13:33, 1 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
== Hey, Thanks for even commenting, bro! (Timeline Theories.) == | == Hey, Thanks for even commenting, bro! (Timeline Theories.) == | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
(...Excuse me for my rather... Exceeding vocabulary for such a user and person. I'm pretty young too, which to most people is outstanding for my age...) [[User:Hylian Historic]] | (...Excuse me for my rather... Exceeding vocabulary for such a user and person. I'm pretty young too, which to most people is outstanding for my age...) [[User:Hylian Historic]] | ||
:<s>I wish I had time right now to read this, but I've got to run! When I get back tonight, I'll give it the read through it deserves. {{:User: | :<s>I wish I had time right now to read this, but I've got to run! When I get back tonight, I'll give it the read through it deserves. {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 15:25, 25 May 2011 (EDT)</s> Ok, I'm here. I'm still a bit confused, but I'll try to twirl this idea around. First, with the "time link" in {{OoT}} and {{TP}}. Are you saying that in either game, Link could have a child that is spiritually awakened as the next hero, and thus springs right into the {{subst:ALLTP}} line? Or is it more like a "time loop" in that the stories exist in a circular pattern, and every time a Link is born, the next game in the timeline series begins? Either way, its interesting in the same way theoretical physics is interesting (love that stuff on string theory, but anyway); it'll definitely need some in-game support - it relies ''heavily'' on speculation... but if I'm not getting the point, let me know! There's a strong possibility I'm just babbling. :) <br> | ||
:Next, ''The Wind Waker'' and the ''Four Swords'' series. This to me is much easier to prove because ''Phantom Hourglass'' leaves its ending so open to interpretation. Literally, anything could come after ''Phantom Hourglass'' (well, within reason, and possibly even in an alternate dimension) and as long as ''Spirit Tracks'' follows around 100 years later, the timeline arc is preserved. {{TMC}} could come after ''Phantom Hourglass'', as could the ''Oracles'', it just depends how much speculation you want to have in your timeline - then again, putting anything between ''Phantom Hourglass'' and ''Spirit Tracks'' is one of those arguments that could not be disproved, or proven by any in-game evidence, given the span of time between the two. In that same vein, the distance between ''Ocarina of Time'' and ''Twilight Princess'' is also 100 years, but connective evidence restricts the flexibility of the timeline at that point. Let me know if I'm ringing any bells here! Keep going with this idea, supported or not, I think it's highly intriguing. {{:User: | :Next, ''The Wind Waker'' and the ''Four Swords'' series. This to me is much easier to prove because ''Phantom Hourglass'' leaves its ending so open to interpretation. Literally, anything could come after ''Phantom Hourglass'' (well, within reason, and possibly even in an alternate dimension) and as long as ''Spirit Tracks'' follows around 100 years later, the timeline arc is preserved. {{TMC}} could come after ''Phantom Hourglass'', as could the ''Oracles'', it just depends how much speculation you want to have in your timeline - then again, putting anything between ''Phantom Hourglass'' and ''Spirit Tracks'' is one of those arguments that could not be disproved, or proven by any in-game evidence, given the span of time between the two. In that same vein, the distance between ''Ocarina of Time'' and ''Twilight Princess'' is also 100 years, but connective evidence restricts the flexibility of the timeline at that point. Let me know if I'm ringing any bells here! Keep going with this idea, supported or not, I think it's highly intriguing. {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 20:11, 25 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
And honestly, I don't go on of much disapproval or support? I'm more on the lines of saying; If you understand what I'm trying to say, in how this can or COULD link into the two games, or the games, or how its possible that they can all be linked from generation to generation. Or, how it's possible to theorize and/or speculate that the games can be all linked together despite technology and century/millennium by information such as Sheikah, Hylians, Ooccoa, Wars, etc. (I hope you get that point of the races, technology, and the reasoning of why I said '''etc'''.) Now, only if we could have a chatroom on this site or had like Skype or a chatroom, it'd be easier, but hey, easy come, easy go, huh? xD;; '''[[User:Hylian Historic]]''' | And honestly, I don't go on of much disapproval or support? I'm more on the lines of saying; If you understand what I'm trying to say, in how this can or COULD link into the two games, or the games, or how its possible that they can all be linked from generation to generation. Or, how it's possible to theorize and/or speculate that the games can be all linked together despite technology and century/millennium by information such as Sheikah, Hylians, Ooccoa, Wars, etc. (I hope you get that point of the races, technology, and the reasoning of why I said '''etc'''.) Now, only if we could have a chatroom on this site or had like Skype or a chatroom, it'd be easier, but hey, easy come, easy go, huh? xD;; '''[[User:Hylian Historic]]''' | ||
:Alright, I'm starting to understand what you're getting at! yay. The games can interchange for each other because there is evidence in each game to support multiple timeline locations, even some that aren't generally accepted. The only reason I preach about evidence and support is because since this wiki is about as factual as one can get on a series that prides itself in the theorizing power of its community, we only try to sponsor the most evidenced theories on the wiki itself. We're all about references, in-game text, and manual/plot support to back up theory - there's still a lot of speculation in here, and because of this, it may not be the best theory to feature on a factually-based wiki, but it still is ''very intriguing''. In respect to my OoA/OoS - PH comment, I was saying that because ''Phantom Hourglass'' leaves it's ending so open for timeline continuity, and that about 100 years expires between it and its confirmed sequel ''Spirit Tracks'', any other game could occur in between this time period, regardless of previous events, and as long as the ship makes it to New Hyrule at the end of 100 years, the timeline arc is preserved. I get what you're getting at! :) Have you submitted this theory to any forums in the ''Zelda'' community? It's the only way it can grow in support - be sure to check out every opportunity to have this idea heard. {{:User: | :Alright, I'm starting to understand what you're getting at! yay. The games can interchange for each other because there is evidence in each game to support multiple timeline locations, even some that aren't generally accepted. The only reason I preach about evidence and support is because since this wiki is about as factual as one can get on a series that prides itself in the theorizing power of its community, we only try to sponsor the most evidenced theories on the wiki itself. We're all about references, in-game text, and manual/plot support to back up theory - there's still a lot of speculation in here, and because of this, it may not be the best theory to feature on a factually-based wiki, but it still is ''very intriguing''. In respect to my OoA/OoS - PH comment, I was saying that because ''Phantom Hourglass'' leaves it's ending so open for timeline continuity, and that about 100 years expires between it and its confirmed sequel ''Spirit Tracks'', any other game could occur in between this time period, regardless of previous events, and as long as the ship makes it to New Hyrule at the end of 100 years, the timeline arc is preserved. I get what you're getting at! :) Have you submitted this theory to any forums in the ''Zelda'' community? It's the only way it can grow in support - be sure to check out every opportunity to have this idea heard. {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 00:43, 28 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
I understand completely and I actually honestly do have some proof or evidence of how I theorize that it could be and maybe possible in fact of the games able to become one giant timeline. (That's the point of it all, to make it go into a sequence order sort of thing.) But it's rather difficult to say it on a wikia such as ''Zelda Wiki''. Due to a lack of a chatbox sort of tool/option (suggestion alert, by the way.) or an inbox manner and/or option. But now, as you can see with you and I talking about this. Is the timeline loop, or the '''time link'''. Right? Well that's basically how it seems currently as of now. xD;; The games '''ALSO''' involved with this are as said: OoT, ALttP, TP, and '''Minor, but are as included!''' OoS/OoA. Also, in now said theory of the Adult Timeline, PH is the very possible ending to the FS series, also possible to OoS/OoA, and ST. Cip, also remind yourself, this is ''NOT'', confirmed at all, this is more like an idea of some sorts, because usually I always wished to think about how at least ALL of the games currently of the franchise, can fit into a larger timeline, including up-coming possible games can be placed wherever or whenever, you know? Also into your option in the other community, I can and might actually, but honestly, I'm not that ''wide'' of being my name, as is ''Hylian Historic''. Maybe if it's sent across some particular sites around the community? Sure! I won't mind whatsoever at all, but it'll take some time for me to ''actually appear'' and say it publicly, because I take my time on most things, you know? '''[[User:Hylian Historic]]''' | I understand completely and I actually honestly do have some proof or evidence of how I theorize that it could be and maybe possible in fact of the games able to become one giant timeline. (That's the point of it all, to make it go into a sequence order sort of thing.) But it's rather difficult to say it on a wikia such as ''Zelda Wiki''. Due to a lack of a chatbox sort of tool/option (suggestion alert, by the way.) or an inbox manner and/or option. But now, as you can see with you and I talking about this. Is the timeline loop, or the '''time link'''. Right? Well that's basically how it seems currently as of now. xD;; The games '''ALSO''' involved with this are as said: OoT, ALttP, TP, and '''Minor, but are as included!''' OoS/OoA. Also, in now said theory of the Adult Timeline, PH is the very possible ending to the FS series, also possible to OoS/OoA, and ST. Cip, also remind yourself, this is ''NOT'', confirmed at all, this is more like an idea of some sorts, because usually I always wished to think about how at least ALL of the games currently of the franchise, can fit into a larger timeline, including up-coming possible games can be placed wherever or whenever, you know? Also into your option in the other community, I can and might actually, but honestly, I'm not that ''wide'' of being my name, as is ''Hylian Historic''. Maybe if it's sent across some particular sites around the community? Sure! I won't mind whatsoever at all, but it'll take some time for me to ''actually appear'' and say it publicly, because I take my time on most things, you know? '''[[User:Hylian Historic]]''' | ||
:Funny you mention a chatbox; Zelda Wiki is on Skype! Look <s>here</s> for all information on how to join the chats, many of which I am a part of! We have a general wiki chat, editor's chat for all things pertaining to the improvement of the site, and other specific chats related to Zelda. We can most definitely talk on there about this theory - my activity on this site and on Skype is going to temporarily drop as I prepare for vacation this week, but ask any of the other active staff on the wiki's Skype page (linked earlier) to add you in! {{:User: | :Funny you mention a chatbox; Zelda Wiki is on Skype! Look <s>here</s> for all information on how to join the chats, many of which I am a part of! We have a general wiki chat, editor's chat for all things pertaining to the improvement of the site, and other specific chats related to Zelda. We can most definitely talk on there about this theory - my activity on this site and on Skype is going to temporarily drop as I prepare for vacation this week, but ask any of the other active staff on the wiki's Skype page (linked earlier) to add you in! {{:User:Cipriano555/sig}} 22:03, 28 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
:...Oh. Well this shows some of my stupidity that I don't know about this site. xD;; Joy. But that's great! ...Happy face can inserted by all of this for all chats, editors, general, improvement. I'm happy for that. :D Hey, I already have Skype, and a username and such, are you able to get me in? Since an admin and/or a person who knows you from this site has to invite you into the chat for most of your time on Skype or rest of your username life. Heh, either or, thanks again! :D;; [[User:Hylian Historic]] | :...Oh. Well this shows some of my stupidity that I don't know about this site. xD;; Joy. But that's great! ...Happy face can inserted by all of this for all chats, editors, general, improvement. I'm happy for that. :D Hey, I already have Skype, and a username and such, are you able to get me in? Since an admin and/or a person who knows you from this site has to invite you into the chat for most of your time on Skype or rest of your username life. Heh, either or, thanks again! :D;; [[User:Hylian Historic]] | ||
