87,836
edits
User talk:Cipriano/archive3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Text replacement - "''Twilight Princess''" to "{{TP}}"
TriforceTony (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "''The Minish Cap''" to "{{TMC}}") |
TriforceTony (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "''Twilight Princess''" to "{{TP}}") |
||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
(...Excuse me for my rather... Exceeding vocabulary for such a user and person. I'm pretty young too, which to most people is outstanding for my age...) [[User:Hylian Historic]] | (...Excuse me for my rather... Exceeding vocabulary for such a user and person. I'm pretty young too, which to most people is outstanding for my age...) [[User:Hylian Historic]] | ||
:<s>I wish I had time right now to read this, but I've got to run! When I get back tonight, I'll give it the read through it deserves. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 15:25, 25 May 2011 (EDT)</s> Ok, I'm here. I'm still a bit confused, but I'll try to twirl this idea around. First, with the "time link" in {{OoT}} and | :<s>I wish I had time right now to read this, but I've got to run! When I get back tonight, I'll give it the read through it deserves. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 15:25, 25 May 2011 (EDT)</s> Ok, I'm here. I'm still a bit confused, but I'll try to twirl this idea around. First, with the "time link" in {{OoT}} and {{TP}}. Are you saying that in either game, Link could have a child that is spiritually awakened as the next hero, and thus springs right into the {{subst:ALLTP}} line? Or is it more like a "time loop" in that the stories exist in a circular pattern, and every time a Link is born, the next game in the timeline series begins? Either way, its interesting in the same way theoretical physics is interesting (love that stuff on string theory, but anyway); it'll definitely need some in-game support - it relies ''heavily'' on speculation... but if I'm not getting the point, let me know! There's a strong possibility I'm just babbling. :) <br> | ||
:Next, ''The Wind Waker'' and the ''Four Swords'' series. This to me is much easier to prove because ''Phantom Hourglass'' leaves its ending so open to interpretation. Literally, anything could come after ''Phantom Hourglass'' (well, within reason, and possibly even in an alternate dimension) and as long as ''Spirit Tracks'' follows around 100 years later, the timeline arc is preserved. {{TMC}} could come after ''Phantom Hourglass'', as could the ''Oracles'', it just depends how much speculation you want to have in your timeline - then again, putting anything between ''Phantom Hourglass'' and ''Spirit Tracks'' is one of those arguments that could not be disproved, or proven by any in-game evidence, given the span of time between the two. In that same vein, the distance between ''Ocarina of Time'' and ''Twilight Princess'' is also 100 years, but connective evidence restricts the flexibility of the timeline at that point. Let me know if I'm ringing any bells here! Keep going with this idea, supported or not, I think it's highly intriguing. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 20:11, 25 May 2011 (EDT) | :Next, ''The Wind Waker'' and the ''Four Swords'' series. This to me is much easier to prove because ''Phantom Hourglass'' leaves its ending so open to interpretation. Literally, anything could come after ''Phantom Hourglass'' (well, within reason, and possibly even in an alternate dimension) and as long as ''Spirit Tracks'' follows around 100 years later, the timeline arc is preserved. {{TMC}} could come after ''Phantom Hourglass'', as could the ''Oracles'', it just depends how much speculation you want to have in your timeline - then again, putting anything between ''Phantom Hourglass'' and ''Spirit Tracks'' is one of those arguments that could not be disproved, or proven by any in-game evidence, given the span of time between the two. In that same vein, the distance between ''Ocarina of Time'' and ''Twilight Princess'' is also 100 years, but connective evidence restricts the flexibility of the timeline at that point. Let me know if I'm ringing any bells here! Keep going with this idea, supported or not, I think it's highly intriguing. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 20:11, 25 May 2011 (EDT) | ||