Talk:Boomerang: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Should it be mentioned here? {{:User:RupeeLord/sig}} 21:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Should it be mentioned here? {{:User:RupeeLord/sig}} 21:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
: The glitch pages would be more appropriate. {{:User:Axiomist/sig}} 22:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
: The glitch pages would be more appropriate. {{:User:Axiomist/sig}} 22:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
==Reorganization==
I believe this page would function better as a summarization-type page, considering many of the incarnations of the Boomerang serve similar purposes. the overal boomerang purpose would be addressed, as well as different funcitonalities present in different games. However, for special boomerangs, like the Gale Boomerang and the "Magical Boomerangs" of the series, they could have their own special section under "Unique Boomerangs" or the like. It ''would not'' involve a rewrite, as I made the mistake of doing with the [[Shield]] page, just a ''reorganization''. Opinions? {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 18:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
{{support}}
{{oppose}}

Revision as of 18:17, 20 November 2009

Gale Boomerang Jump

There is a glitch involving the Gale Boomerang of TP where you can cross long gaps:
Heres a video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByM-TF9x9pc&feature=related
Should it be mentioned here? User:RupeeLord/sig 21:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

The glitch pages would be more appropriate. User:Axiomist/sig 22:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Reorganization

I believe this page would function better as a summarization-type page, considering many of the incarnations of the Boomerang serve similar purposes. the overal boomerang purpose would be addressed, as well as different funcitonalities present in different games. However, for special boomerangs, like the Gale Boomerang and the "Magical Boomerangs" of the series, they could have their own special section under "Unique Boomerangs" or the like. It would not involve a rewrite, as I made the mistake of doing with the Shield page, just a reorganization. Opinions? User:Cipriano 119/sig 18:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Support
Opposition