Talk:Fire Baba: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 10 January 2010 by Dany36 in topic Merge
No edit summary |
m (→Merge) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{Disagree}} | {{Disagree}} | ||
# NO. These are not Deku Baba. If anything, they are modified Boko Baba. If I recall correctly, Deku Baba only exist in OoT and the MM-TP side of timeline. [[User:Leftisthominid|Leftisthominid]] 21:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | # NO. These are not Deku Baba. If anything, they are modified Boko Baba. If I recall correctly, Deku Baba only exist in OoT and the MM-TP side of timeline. [[User:Leftisthominid|Leftisthominid]] 21:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Yes, I apologize. It was a hasty decision, seeing how Boko Baba and Serpent Baba have their own pages. [[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 21:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:46, 10 January 2010
Merge
It's a form of a deku baba. Shall we merge away as always?—Justin(Talk) 23:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Please place your edit in the section which represents your stance.
Agree- Really? Would have never guessed. User:Cipriano 119/sig 05:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- It seems reasonable. It's a variant of a Baba, so it makes sense to merge it. Dmac 11:17, 9 January 2010
Disagree- NO. These are not Deku Baba. If anything, they are modified Boko Baba. If I recall correctly, Deku Baba only exist in OoT and the MM-TP side of timeline. Leftisthominid 21:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I apologize. It was a hasty decision, seeing how Boko Baba and Serpent Baba have their own pages. Dany36 21:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)