Talk:Blade Brothers: Difference between revisions
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:You shouldn't just do something because you're tired of waiting for it. On a wiki it can sometimes take months to come to a decision on something. That's how it is. Impatience only causes mistakes and problems. I for one don't think that we should be so happy to merge things like this. Some of these guys are more prominent than the others.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 17:43, February 14, 2010 (UTC) | :You shouldn't just do something because you're tired of waiting for it. On a wiki it can sometimes take months to come to a decision on something. That's how it is. Impatience only causes mistakes and problems. I for one don't think that we should be so happy to merge things like this. Some of these guys are more prominent than the others.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 17:43, February 14, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I disagree. The fact is that there's been no discussion at all. Perhaps someone could make an announcement on the main page? | |||
Revision as of 17:45, 14 February 2010
Merging
We should definitely merge all of the blade brothers into this page. If I don't hear any objections within the hour I'm going to do it. -Pinecove
- I object. Simply because an hour isn't enough time for people to weigh in with their opinions. I think 48 hours notice would be prudent. User:Petenu/sig 17:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- No. We don't act without a group consensus.
- But I do agree that they need to be merged. They are all really tiny articles.—Justin(Talk) 17:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- If nobody has objected in two days then. Guess we'll have to wait it out. Pinecove 17:28, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Pinecove, one of the most important rules of merging is to garner adequate consensus from the users here. "Within the hour" will not give anyone enough time to weigh opinions, nor will 48 hours. I suggest waiting until there is a clear approval from a good amount of users, not just two. I agree to the merge as well, but you should really wait until more users comment below me before doing so. These articles aren't going to run away if a lot of time elapses between the casting of opinions, merging is never that urgent. =) User:Cipriano 119/sig 18:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- So are we going to do this thing or what? It's been like a month now and nobody has objected. Pinecove 17:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Start asking people to comment on it. That's what I do when there's not enough agreement to merge something.—Justin(Talk) 17:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- So are we going to do this thing or what? It's been like a month now and nobody has objected. Pinecove 17:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Pinecove, one of the most important rules of merging is to garner adequate consensus from the users here. "Within the hour" will not give anyone enough time to weigh opinions, nor will 48 hours. I suggest waiting until there is a clear approval from a good amount of users, not just two. I agree to the merge as well, but you should really wait until more users comment below me before doing so. These articles aren't going to run away if a lot of time elapses between the casting of opinions, merging is never that urgent. =) User:Cipriano 119/sig 18:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- If nobody has objected in two days then. Guess we'll have to wait it out. Pinecove 17:28, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
BROTHERS! TONIGHT, WE MERRRRRRGE!!! Or at least I think that's what we should do. Not EVERYONE gets their own article, after all, and everything to do with merging these people seems relevant. Heck, even The Minish Cap didn't give them individual figurines. They all were a part of one large figurine. As much as I agree that a merge like this needs a lot of discussion for at least a week before merging, people just haven't been discussing enough. They discussed giving the merge time more than the merge itself. The templates back been up for two weeks, but maybe we could get some actual opinions going here. Noble Wrot 17:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- You shouldn't just do something because you're tired of waiting for it. On a wiki it can sometimes take months to come to a decision on something. That's how it is. Impatience only causes mistakes and problems. I for one don't think that we should be so happy to merge things like this. Some of these guys are more prominent than the others.User:Matt/sig 17:43, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree. The fact is that there's been no discussion at all. Perhaps someone could make an announcement on the main page?