Talk:Fire Baba: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 10 January 2010 by Dany36 in topic Merge
(→Merge: Mass Sig Updates - Round 4) |
m (→Merge: Cipriano Username Change) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Please place your edit in the section which represents your stance. | Please place your edit in the section which represents your stance. | ||
{{Agree}} | {{Agree}} | ||
# Really? Would have never guessed. {{:User: | # Really? Would have never guessed. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 05:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
# It seems reasonable. It's a variant of a Baba, so it makes sense to merge it. Dmac 11:17, 9 January 2010 | # It seems reasonable. It's a variant of a Baba, so it makes sense to merge it. Dmac 11:17, 9 January 2010 | ||
{{Disagree}} | {{Disagree}} |
Latest revision as of 22:28, 22 October 2022
Merge
It's a form of a deku baba. Shall we merge away as always?User:Justin ZW/sig 23:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Please place your edit in the section which represents your stance.
Agree
- Really? Would have never guessed. — ciprianotalk 05:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- It seems reasonable. It's a variant of a Baba, so it makes sense to merge it. Dmac 11:17, 9 January 2010
Disagree
- NO. These are not Deku Baba. If anything, they are modified Boko Baba. If I recall correctly, Deku Baba only exist in OoT and the MM-TP side of timeline. Leftisthominid 21:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I apologize. It was a hasty decision, seeing how Boko Baba and Serpent Baba have their own pages. Dany36 21:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)