Talk:Makar's Violin: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 November 2016 by Stallord in topic Consistency
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


Can we finish this discussion? [[User:Peanutjon|Peanutjon]] ([[User talk:Peanutjon|talk]]) 17:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Can we finish this discussion? [[User:Peanutjon|Peanutjon]] ([[User talk:Peanutjon|talk]]) 17:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Objections seem to be rather lacking in presence, and there is no pre-existing page to make the move difficult. Shall we simply have it done? [[User:Stallord|Lord of the Stalfos Creatures]] - [[User talk:Stallord|Stalfos Meeting Chamber]] 22:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:28, 20 November 2016

Consistency

To keep this consistent with Rito Harp, and since it's conjectural anyway, should it be moved to Korok Violin? Peanutjon (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It might even not been Makar's but Fado's Violin. Makar's figurine says that despite Makar using it as a cello, it's actually a violin, and Fado actually uses this same instrument as a violin. Jeangabin (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But wouldn't that make it a Kokiri Violin? Yet it's not a Zora Harp.
Just because he uses it as a cello doesn't make it not a violin - you can use a violin in any way you want and it's still a violin. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, even if you use it as a back-scratcher. Peanutjon (talk) 16:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What I meant is that Makar's figurine description implies this instrument originally belonged to someone (Fado) who used it as what it actually is, a violin. Not to Makar who uses it as a cello. Jeangabin (talk) 21:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So anyway, can we move it to Korok Violin? Peanutjon (talk) 17:21, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I support this move. with the Rito Harp getting an official name, I feel that this one should follow a similar naming convention at least until something official comes along.
Ixbran (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can we finish this discussion? Peanutjon (talk) 17:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Objections seem to be rather lacking in presence, and there is no pre-existing page to make the move difficult. Shall we simply have it done? Lord of the Stalfos Creatures - Stalfos Meeting Chamber 22:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]