Talk:Volvagia: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - 'Adamcox82' to 'Adam')
Line 47: Line 47:
::::Well, so far it looks like we're unanimously pro-merge. Anyone know how to make it so? *coughnevermergedanarticlebeforecough* [[User:Dinosaur bob|Dinosaur bob]] 19:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
::::Well, so far it looks like we're unanimously pro-merge. Anyone know how to make it so? *coughnevermergedanarticlebeforecough* [[User:Dinosaur bob|Dinosaur bob]] 19:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
The merge is done, and since few users are aware of how to get to a redirect page discussion, I figured to bring the discussion here. As there have been questions on why these two pages were merged. On a side note, I want to say that we should be cautious about merging pages based on their Japanese names. This is an English language wiki. But I'm not against this nor Hiploop/Helmasaur being merged as the enemies are overall the same. {{:User:Axiomist/sig}} 03:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
The merge is done, and since few users are aware of how to get to a redirect page discussion, I figured to bring the discussion here. As there have been questions on why these two pages were merged. On a side note, I want to say that we should be cautious about merging pages based on their Japanese names. This is an English language wiki. But I'm not against this nor Hiploop/Helmasaur being merged as the enemies are overall the same. {{:User:Axiomist/sig}} 03:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm bringing this discussion back up because ultimately the merging of these articles is unjustified. The merge was based off the similarities in appearance and the same Japanese name. While of course on a normal basis I'd say that's sufficiency evidence, however our current policy is that then English text is canon over the Japanese text, seeing as it is an English wiki. So I think the two articles should be unmerged, otherwise a change in policy is in order.{{:User:Steven/sig}} 22:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Navigation menu