Talk:Baby Dodongo

This article is really small, and this could easily just be a subsection of the Dodongo article. Merge? Ganondorfdude11 22:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Support

1. Of course, I'm surprised this wasn't caught earlier. This article would better function as a subset of Dodongo article, where it should have been in the first place. — cipriano^talk 23:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Opposition