Page history
25 April 2010
Mandi2517@legacy41958928
Protected "Eiji Aonuma": Counter-productive edit warring ([edit=sysop] (expires 06:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)) [move=sysop] (expires 06:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)))
mMandi2517@legacy41958928
Reverted edits by Christopher (Talk) to last revision by Triforce of the Gods
m−133
Christopher-gpuser
He never once says he cares nothing about the timeline at all. And it is your opinion that he cares nothing about it.
+133
Triforce of the Gods@legacy41959031
No one has given that reason before you. That's not an opinion, Miyamoto said that himself.
m−133
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline: This merely acknowledges that there are some who DO in fact question it because of this. And that's an opinion about Miyamoto, you don't speak for him.
+133
Triforce of the Gods@legacy41959031
That's not why people question it. Miyamoto doesn't have to confirm his statements, especially when Miyamoto doesn't give a rat's ass about the timeline.
m−121
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline
+31
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline: Too many periods, sorry about that.
+52
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline
+37
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline
+89
Mandi2517@legacy41958928
Reverted edits by Christopher (Talk) to last revision by Nerushi
m+1,563
Christopher-gpuser
Removal altogether is a good idea, as this does not belong on pages such as these.
−1,563
Nerushi@legacy41960596
→Contribution to the timeline
−649
Christopher-gpuser
Compromise language shaped by both parties.
+895
Christopher-gpuser
Undid revision 207316 by Nerushi (Talk)
−229
Nerushi@legacy41960596
→Statements regarding the timeline
+229
Nerushi@legacy41960596
Undid revision 207314 by Christopher (Talk) un-scewed.
−903
Christopher-gpuser
Undid revision 207313 by Nerushi (Talk)
+903
Nerushi@legacy41960596
Undid revision 207312 by Christopher (Talk) Alright.
−903
Christopher-gpuser
Undid revision 207311 by Nerushi (Talk)Will be talking to the staff about your refusal of compromise.
+903
Nerushi@legacy41960596
Undid revision 207310 by Christopher (Talk) Sorry, there is no bias hee. Just Aonuma statements.
−903
Christopher-gpuser
Undid revision 207309 by Nerushi (Talk)Your bias you mean.
+903
Nerushi@legacy41960596
Undid revision 207308 by Christopher (Talk) No. Make your own 'controvery section'. No need for personal bias here.
−903
Christopher-gpuser
Undid revision 207307 by Nerushi (Talk)You turn that around.
m+898
Nerushi@legacy41960596
Keep fan controversy out of this, please?
−898
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline: Do not slant it one way or the other, I reshaped it fairly in my opinion. To try to lead readers like that is not neutral.
−251
Christopher-gpuser
Undid revision 207303 by Nerushi (Talk)
+1,156
Nerushi@legacy41960596
→Contribution to the timeline: Okay! Simple & clean. No fan controversy here, since that will only make it go off topic.
−1,156
Nerushi@legacy41960596
→Contribution to the timeline: Don't remove that.
+251
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline
+147
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline: To sound more impartial.
−228
Nerushi@legacy41960596
→Contribution to the timeline
+500
Christopher-gpuser
Undid revision 207285 by Nerushi (Talk) These are all valid points.
+249
Nerushi@legacy41960596
→Contribution to the timeline: Huh? Despite what? And no, fans don't care what Shigeru Miyamoto has to say actually. he was even less involved in the FS games.
−249
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline
+84
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline
−26
Christopher-gpuser
→Contribution to the timeline
+167
24 April 2010
Nerushi@legacy41960596
→Contribution to the timeline
m−3
Nerushi@legacy41960596
→Contribution to the timeline
+21
Nerushi@legacy41960596
no edit summary
+1,558
29 September 2009
7 July 2009
Bodo@legacy41960353
Reformatted citation.
m−26
Bodo@legacy41960353
Located and cited source of Aonuma-san's Mario/jumping quote.
+179
