Talk:Terminan Apocalypse: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Delete? This is so badly written I don't think it needs mentioning. Most of it is covered already in other articles. Pointless to begin with. No references, the title itself is a...") |
m (Text replacement - "{{:User:K2L/sig}}" to "{{:User:K2L3798/sig}}") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Delete? This is so badly written I don't think it needs mentioning. Most of it is covered already in other articles. Pointless to begin with. No references, the title itself is a typo, improper formatting, etc. [[User:Ganondorfdude11|Ganondorfdude11]] 22:40, 29 April 2011 (EDT) | Delete? This is so badly written I don't think it needs mentioning. Most of it is covered already in other articles. Pointless to begin with. No references, the title itself is a typo, improper formatting, etc. [[User:Ganondorfdude11|Ganondorfdude11]] 22:40, 29 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
:I believe that once this article is fixed, most of its content can be moved to [[Final Day]], where it belongs. [[User:Ganondorfdude11|Ganondorfdude11]] 22:52, 29 April 2011 (EDT) | :I believe that once this article is fixed, most of its content can be moved to [[Final Day]], where it belongs. [[User:Ganondorfdude11|Ganondorfdude11]] 22:52, 29 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
::I rewrote the page to give it more relevance. And thanks for moving again the page, I tried to move it from the even-worse grammar it previously had, without knowing that I myself left a typo as well. --{{:User:K2L3798/sig}} 23:07, 29 April 2011 (EDT) | |||
:::Well, I suppose the rewrite makes it good, but I doubt more can be said about it. Maybe finding sources for the Miyamoto interview mentioned in the original or the unspecified poll? [[User:Ganondorfdude11|Ganondorfdude11]] 23:14, 29 April 2011 (EDT) | |||
::::At this point I would definitely say this is a keeper, and others agree. If we had a Game Over article, I'd say we should merge it into that, but we don't (not yet, at least), so I think it's fine as is. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 15:31, 1 May 2011 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:07, 8 June 2020
Delete? This is so badly written I don't think it needs mentioning. Most of it is covered already in other articles. Pointless to begin with. No references, the title itself is a typo, improper formatting, etc. Ganondorfdude11 22:40, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
- I believe that once this article is fixed, most of its content can be moved to Final Day, where it belongs. Ganondorfdude11 22:52, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
- I rewrote the page to give it more relevance. And thanks for moving again the page, I tried to move it from the even-worse grammar it previously had, without knowing that I myself left a typo as well. --K2L (Interrogatory) 23:07, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
- Well, I suppose the rewrite makes it good, but I doubt more can be said about it. Maybe finding sources for the Miyamoto interview mentioned in the original or the unspecified poll? Ganondorfdude11 23:14, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
- I rewrote the page to give it more relevance. And thanks for moving again the page, I tried to move it from the even-worse grammar it previously had, without knowing that I myself left a typo as well. --K2L (Interrogatory) 23:07, 29 April 2011 (EDT)
- At this point I would definitely say this is a keeper, and others agree. If we had a Game Over article, I'd say we should merge it into that, but we don't (not yet, at least), so I think it's fine as is. — Hylian King [*] 15:31, 1 May 2011 (EDT)