Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 19:28, 13 August 2022
, 13 August 2022Mass Sig Updates - Round 4
m (Standardizing: Nosig -> Unsigned) |
(Mass Sig Updates - Round 4) |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
== Weird == | == Weird == | ||
This game has blood and violence and it was just Rated E. [[User:Paper Jorge|Paper Jorge]] | This game has blood and violence and it was just Rated E. [[User:Paper Jorge@legacy41957976|Paper Jorge]] | ||
Technically, no. in latter versions, it's rated T.--[[User:Eponasowner@legacy41958113|Eponasowner]] 14:39, 18 November 2007 (EST) | Technically, no. in latter versions, it's rated T.--[[User:Eponasowner@legacy41958113|Eponasowner]] 14:39, 18 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
== Links (the external kinds, not the hero kinds) == | == Links (the external kinds, not the hero kinds) == | ||
So... how do we feel about the external links section linking to fan sites? We have no official policy on this so I didn't want to remove it without discussing it first... I personally don't think we should because, well, there's a probably at least a hundred sites that could be linked to with little to no justification, and if we don't decide something regarding their fate, we could end up having these hundred links all over the place! Thoughts? {{:User:Ando1400@legacy41958204/sig}} 15:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)<br> | So... how do we feel about the external links section linking to fan sites? We have no official policy on this so I didn't want to remove it without discussing it first... I personally don't think we should because, well, there's a probably at least a hundred sites that could be linked to with little to no justification, and if we don't decide something regarding their fate, we could end up having these hundred links all over the place! Thoughts? {{:User:Ando1400@legacy41958204/sig}} 15:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)<br/> | ||
<small>I also think that the existing links should be moved to a references section, as references for a "reception" section, thus removing pretty much any need for an external links section.</small> | <small>I also think that the existing links should be moved to a references section, as references for a "reception" section, thus removing pretty much any need for an external links section.</small> | ||
