Talk:Forest Temple: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attempting to source a citation.
No edit summary |
(Attempting to source a citation.) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Both of these ideas seem to feed off each other, since we know the Koroks once lived in the Forbidden Woods, and if the Forbidden Woods are the Forest Temple, then that means the Koroks/Kokiri once lived in the temple. As far as I know, however, neither has any actual supporting evidence. In ''OoT'', the Kokiri live in the aptly named Kokiri Forest, right next to the Great Deku Tree - their creator - and I can't really imagine why they might ever have lived elsewhere, in a temple no less. As for the Forbidden Woods, seeing as how all the information we're really given about it is that the Koroks used to inhabit it, it seems to be pretty strongly implied that it was one Kokiri Forest, which is backed by the tree-houses present in the dungeon. Also, as someone above pointed out, the Forest Temple is made of stone, not trees. Any objections to removing these theories, or is there a real argument behind them? [[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]] 06:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC) | Both of these ideas seem to feed off each other, since we know the Koroks once lived in the Forbidden Woods, and if the Forbidden Woods are the Forest Temple, then that means the Koroks/Kokiri once lived in the temple. As far as I know, however, neither has any actual supporting evidence. In ''OoT'', the Kokiri live in the aptly named Kokiri Forest, right next to the Great Deku Tree - their creator - and I can't really imagine why they might ever have lived elsewhere, in a temple no less. As for the Forbidden Woods, seeing as how all the information we're really given about it is that the Koroks used to inhabit it, it seems to be pretty strongly implied that it was one Kokiri Forest, which is backed by the tree-houses present in the dungeon. Also, as someone above pointed out, the Forest Temple is made of stone, not trees. Any objections to removing these theories, or is there a real argument behind them? [[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]] 06:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Tracking down a citation== | |||
In trying to source "The Forest Temple is known as the "topsy-turviest" level in Zelda history", I discovered that the November 2006 issue of Nintendo Power contained the article ''The Stuff of Legends (Zelda) Part 2''. This article listed the Forest Temple and Stone Tower Temple as two of Zelda's top five dungeons. I don't own the magazine and can't find any more details about the article, but it seems possible that this article may be the source of the topsy-turvy reputation. Maybe someone out there has a copy and can check it out. {{:User:Bodo/sig}} 03:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | |||