Talk:Boomerang: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
m (Text replace - "K2L (Interrogatory)" to "{{:User:K2L/sig}}") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Reorganization== | ==Reorganization== | ||
I believe this page would function better as a summarization-type page, considering many of the incarnations of the Boomerang serve similar purposes. the overal boomerang purpose would be addressed, as well as different funcitonalities present in different games. However, for special boomerangs, like the Gale Boomerang and the "Magical Boomerangs" of the series, they could have their own special section under "Unique Boomerangs" or the like. It ''would not'' involve a rewrite, as I made the mistake of doing with the [[Shield]] page, just a ''reorganization''. Opinions? {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 18:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC) | I believe this page would function better as a summarization-type page, considering many of the incarnations of the Boomerang serve similar purposes. the overal boomerang purpose would be addressed, as well as different funcitonalities present in different games. However, for special boomerangs, like the Gale Boomerang and the "Magical Boomerangs" of the series, they could have their own special section under "Unique Boomerangs" or the like. It ''would not'' involve a rewrite, as I made the mistake of doing with the [[Shield]] page, just a ''reorganization''. Opinions? {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 18:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
I say it's worth a shot, if you want to. You guys need all the practice you can get before going up against that [[ | I say it's worth a shot, if you want to. You guys need all the practice you can get before going up against that [[Potion]]s page. It was organized by game which blew, then by color which blew worse, and is now by function which still blows but much less so...My personal opinion is that organizing by game release is the least clever layout, some pages work that way, but some don't :p I mean the series flips from 2D to 3D too much for it to be practical to maintain. The AoL section here is nothing more than Trivia imo. But then again almost all of the sections are just blurbs of text. I can so see the benefit of a reorganization. {{:User:Axiomist/sig}} 04:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
::There's way to much blowing going on lol. Yea I agree, the laziest and least interesting form of organization is by game, however, it does work when it comes down to articles like [[Rupees]] which change in value dependent on each game. I'll see if I can get around to it sometime this weekend, if not this week, but yea like the [[ | ::There's way to much blowing going on lol. Yea I agree, the laziest and least interesting form of organization is by game, however, it does work when it comes down to articles like [[Rupees]] which change in value dependent on each game. I'll see if I can get around to it sometime this weekend, if not this week, but yea like the [[Potion]]s article, I foresee an organizational revolution approaching from the west. {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 05:05, 21 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Good man. You should go for it. Like I said before, let's just see what happens. My suggestion would be to make it something like Boomerang, Magic Boomerang, and Gale Boomerang with a list within a list, like the type of boomerang to a bullet list of the games. Maybe you can cluster the games together. Most incarnations of the boomerang are different from game to game, but some are the same. I'm sure you have it all figured out this way, but I want you to know I would agree with it. [[User:Noble Wrot|Noble Wrot]] 05:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC) | :::Good man. You should go for it. Like I said before, let's just see what happens. My suggestion would be to make it something like Boomerang, Magic Boomerang, and Gale Boomerang with a list within a list, like the type of boomerang to a bullet list of the games. Maybe you can cluster the games together. Most incarnations of the boomerang are different from game to game, but some are the same. I'm sure you have it all figured out this way, but I want you to know I would agree with it. [[User:Noble Wrot|Noble Wrot]] 05:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::I believe I have completed the reorganization-ish. What do you think? {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 19:25, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | ::::I believe I have completed the reorganization-ish. What do you think? {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 19:25, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | ||