Zelda Wiki:Featured Article Nomination: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
== [[Helmaroc King]] ==
== [[Helmaroc King]] ==
<div style="font-size:120%; font-weight:bold;">
<div style="font-size:120%; font-weight:bold;">
*Score: 1
*Score: 2
*Final Date: April 13, 2013
*Final Date: April 13, 2013
</div>
</div>
Line 34: Line 34:
{{Support}}
{{Support}}
#Agreed, for all the reasons stated in the nomination. --[[User:Xizor|Xizor]] 18:38, 6 December 2011 (EST)
#Agreed, for all the reasons stated in the nomination. --[[User:Xizor|Xizor]] 18:38, 6 December 2011 (EST)
#I'd love to see this article featured because of how amazing this boss battle was as well as how impressed I was when I saw this boss for the first time. {{:User:GeneralTarken/sig}} 03:19, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}
{{Oppose}}



Revision as of 03:19, 7 February 2013

Where to start.
Getting
Involved

Zelda Wiki's discussion center
Discussion
Center

Image request and support center.
Image
Requests

Zelda Wiki's book of knowledge and regulations.
Help
Guide


Here, users can nominate and vote for Zelda Wiki's next featured article. Any article worthy of being featured exemplifies the Wiki's quality standards, and goes above and beyond what is expected in a normal encyclopedia entry. Featured articles should:

  1. Have exceptionally fluid American English grammar and spelling.
  2. Be lengthy, yet detailed.
  3. Be well organized (as in subdivisions).
  4. Cite sources, and cite them properly.
  5. Be properly categorized.
  6. Contain the most up-to-date information possible.
  7. Have no template requesting improvement, merging, deletion, or any template that may in some way state the article is not of excellent quality. In this respect, there should be no duplicate of the nominated article, nor should the article be a duplicate of another page.
  8. NOT be copied from Wikipedia, or from any site that does not run the Wiki, under any circumstances!

For help on the correct format used to add nominations or votes, see the Featured Content Help.

Rules:
Scoring and conditions for passing a nomination:

  1. All nominations start with an initial score of zero.
  2. A supporting vote adds 1 to the score.
  3. An opposing vote subtracts 1 from the score.
  4. An article needs to achieve a score of +5 within 4 months of the nomination date in order to be featured.
  5. A nomination automatically fails if the score drops to -3.

Voting:

  1. You may only vote once on any particular article.
  2. You may not vote on any articles you have nominated.
  3. Votes should be added beneath the relevant header (either support or opposition), with # at the beginning of the line. The current score must be updated to reflect this new vote.
  4. Supporting votes should include a brief message stating why the article should be featured.
  5. Opposing votes must specify how the article fails to meet one or more of the qualifying criteria described above.
  6. All votes MUST be signed using ~~~~ If you do not sign, your vote WILL NOT be counted!


Current nominations

River Zora

  • Score: 0
  • Final Date: April 13, 2013
File:Zola.png

This page was refreshing for me. It's an older enemy that got limited exposure in the series. I thought the article was well-fleshed out and in-depth for such unpopular enemy. It has plenty of references, lots of details, a pleasing layout, everything you'd want in an article.User:Matt/sig 02:33, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Support
  1. Definitely one of the best enemy pages on the site, its got quite a nice layout without losing vital information, and doesn't confuse details across games unlike many other enemy articles. If it has any faults, its that it probably has a few too many images at the moment of writing, but it has a lot of accurate information and is presented in a good manner. Fizzle 14:58, 24 October 2011 (EDT)
Opposition
  1. The article may be well written, but it's lengthy, and the theory section needs to be cut. With a bit of work, it'll be perfect for featuring. User:Darkness/sig 01:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Neutral Comments
  1. I don't really know, it looks pretty messy to me. The page certainly has enough information, and quite a few references, but image usage especially makes the page seem just ... I don't know, umm ... messy is still the best term I can think of. Especially the trivia section. Just a bit of cleaning and it has my vote. ZENOX T C 22:16, 17 February 2011 (EST)
  2. As I have already voted "for" Hyrule Castle this month, I'll just say that it is a good article, but I would recommend losing the trivia section if you wish it to have a real chance at being featured. Vyselink
  3. The article is well written, and well-sourced. My only gripe is that it is perhaps the longest "common enemy" article, and it is not yet harmonized with the other "common enemy" articles that have, for the most part, taken on a similar layout. Once this is done, I think this'll be prime for featuring. — ciprianotalk 00:13, 14 March 2011 (EDT)
Negated/Retracted Votes

1. This picture just does not look good. I agree with Zenox. It is really messy. I hate that enemy anyway(Not that my opinion on the enemy itself matters.). TriforceSlash 12:24, 19 April 2011 (EDT) (this is about an article not a picture)'User:Mandi/sig 19:40, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Helmaroc King

  • Score: 2
  • Final Date: April 13, 2013
File:Helmaroc King.png

This article is full of knowledge, without excess or repeated information. I think it has amazing detail, especially on the Appearances and Strategy section, and just shocked me when I first saw it. Including the figurine template and plenty of resources, I believe this article has the potential to be featured. --TheHK (T) (C) 18:05, 11 October 2011 (EDT)

Support
  1. Agreed, for all the reasons stated in the nomination. --Xizor 18:38, 6 December 2011 (EST)
  2. I'd love to see this article featured because of how amazing this boss battle was as well as how impressed I was when I saw this boss for the first time. User:GeneralTarken/sig 03:19, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Opposition
Neutral Comments
Negated/Retracted Votes

I agree for this article to be nominated because, when I first played Wind Waker, the Helmaroc King really struck me as amazing. -- Shyla12323 15:24, 17 December 2012 (EST) Negated because liking the subject is not a valid point to support a nomination.User:Justin/sig 01:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Featured Articles

The featured articles are listed in this format:

  • Name of Article (Date it became featured)

Articles that have been disqualified are in the format:

  • Name of Article (Date it became featured) (Date disqualified)


  • Zant (October 16, 2007)
  • Link (December 15, 2007)
  • Veran (November 24, 2008)
  • Bomb (March 13, 2010)

Voting Archive

(Failed Nominations)