Talk:Zephos

Merge with Cyclos into Wind Gods

I believe the Cyclos and Zephos pages should be merged into the Wind Gods page. Having all three of these articles makes for a lot of redundant information. Plus, all the articles are practically stubs without much possibility for expansion. It seems like a no-brainer to me. What say you: aye or nay? Hylian King 18:42, 12 September 2010 (EDT)

Well, all three are relatively small, and could be merged, so I agree. Gormanbros 20:20, 12 September 2010 (EDT)Gormanbros

Alternatively, the Wind Gods page could simply be deleted, and turned into a disambiguation page or something... Hylian King 07:19, 13 September 2010 (EDT)

I don't think that merging Zephos and Cyclos is a good idea at all. There's quite a bit that can be written about both of them, and most of our pages are about that big anyway. But of course we don't need the Wind Gods page, so that should be converted to a disambiguation page.User:Matt/sig 11:24, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

I don't care about the fate of the Wind Gods page, but I do think that Cyclos and Zephos should be merged. Kind of like Sharp and Flat. They're both stubby-looking. Are we looking at the same pages, Matt? ;D —Embyr 75  ^--Talk-- 10:04, 13 September 2010 (EDT)

As you can see on the Wind Gods talk page, the matter is a little unsettled. We'll just start with turning the Wind Gods page into a disambig and figure something out from there... Hylian King 09:46, 18 September 2010 (EDT)

The pages are stubby but still mearging the two pages together would be unwise because they are separate characters though the wind gods thread is perhaps overkill since we have a page them each on there own Theif 1 04:55, 31 May 2011 (EDT)