User talk:K2L3798@legacy41960118: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User talk:K2L3798@legacy41960118 (view source)
Revision as of 19:04, 5 January 2012
, 5 January 2012→RE: Grinding up, huh?: new section
(→Just a note about those timeline placement sections: new section) |
(→RE: Grinding up, huh?: new section) |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
Right, not sure if you have noticed before, but there was an ongoing conflict in regards to the timeline placement sections. Mighty Dekunut was being rather... passionate about how he felt the sections should have been written and where they would be placed in the article. The conflict seems to be over now, but since I've noticed that you did some editing in some of those sections, I dunno maybe MD won't like some of those changes. Anyway I just wanted to give the heads up, since as far as I know, there's several people working on the timeline stuff on the wiki. [[User:The Goron Moron|The Goron Moron]] 14:04, 5 January 2012 (EST) | Right, not sure if you have noticed before, but there was an ongoing conflict in regards to the timeline placement sections. Mighty Dekunut was being rather... passionate about how he felt the sections should have been written and where they would be placed in the article. The conflict seems to be over now, but since I've noticed that you did some editing in some of those sections, I dunno maybe MD won't like some of those changes. Anyway I just wanted to give the heads up, since as far as I know, there's several people working on the timeline stuff on the wiki. [[User:The Goron Moron|The Goron Moron]] 14:04, 5 January 2012 (EST) | ||
== RE: Grinding up, huh? == | |||
'''(Post brought from [[User talk:Mighty Dekunut]])''' | |||
When you responded to The Goron Moron's question regarding your ('''very hasty''') edits to the game articles and their timeline sections, you had started replying him ''"I'm doing some groundwork '(plus I need the edits for the Zelda Timeline article)'"''. Wait, so you were deliberately editing consecutively the articles in order to get the autoconfirmed rank and edit the Zelda Timeline page? That's a bad etiquette, you know. The Zelda Timeline article is not going anywhere, you can patiently edit other articles so you can legitimately reach the minumum of edits and then go for the semi-protected pages. So please keep this in mind, once again remember that patrollers have to check every edit to ensure they're of good quality, and deliberately rising the number of edits will make their job harder than necessary. --{{:User:K2L/sig}} 13:49, 5 January 2012 (EST) | |||
:The 'multiple edits' were the only 'artificial' (though still legitimate) edits. The edits to the timeline sections were an effort to create one format for this section across all the games. The whole discussion that stemmed from it, was not planned or anything. | |||
:All the edits I have made and pages I've created, now and in the past, to for instance the merchandise pages, or the minor clean-ups I make when I see them, have nothing to do with reaching the edits; it's just wiki-ing. | |||
:If you really feel my contributions are in vain, please explain to me why and I'll refrain from it. [[User:Mighty Dekunut|Mighty Dekunut]] 14:04, 5 January 2012 (EST) | |||